LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs
2403.20279
0
0
🔍
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability in a variety of NLP tasks. Despite their effectiveness, these models are prone to generate nonfactual content. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is pivotal in enhancing our understanding of a model's confidence in its generated content, thereby aiding in the mitigation of nonfactual outputs. Existing research on UQ predominantly targets short text generation, typically yielding brief, word-limited responses. However, real-world applications frequently necessitate much longer responses. Our study first highlights the limitations of current UQ methods in handling long text generation. We then introduce textsc{Luq}, a novel sampling-based UQ approach specifically designed for long text. Our findings reveal that textsc{Luq} outperforms existing baseline methods in correlating with the model's factuality scores (negative coefficient of -0.85 observed for Gemini Pro). With textsc{Luq} as the tool for UQ, we investigate behavior patterns of several popular LLMs' response confidence spectrum and how that interplays with the response' factuality. We identify that LLMs lack confidence in generating long text for rare facts and a factually strong model (i.e. GPT-4) tends to reject questions it is not sure about. To further improve the factual accuracy of LLM responses, we propose a method called textsc{Luq-Ensemble} that ensembles responses from multiple models and selects the response with the least uncertainty. The ensembling method greatly improves the response factuality upon the best standalone LLM.
Create account to get full access
Technical Explanation
Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is crucial for understanding a language model's confidence in its generated content, helping mitigate nonfactual outputs. However, existing UQ research primarily targets short text generation, while real-world applications often require much longer responses.
This study highlights the limitations of current UQ methods for handling long text generation. It introduces textsc{Luq}, a novel sampling-based UQ approach specifically designed for long text. textsc{Luq} outperforms existing baseline methods in correlating with the model's factuality scores, with a negative coefficient of -0.85 observed for Gemini Pro.
Using textsc{Luq} as the UQ tool, the researchers investigate behavior patterns of several popular Large Language Models (LLMs) and how their response confidence interplays with factuality. They find that LLMs lack confidence in generating long text for rare facts, and a factually strong model like GPT-4 tends to reject questions it is unsure about.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a virtual assistant that can provide lengthy responses to your questions. However, sometimes the assistant might give inaccurate or misleading information, especially when discussing obscure topics. To address this issue, researchers have developed a method called textsc{Luq} to gauge the assistant's confidence in its own responses.
textsc{Luq} works by generating multiple versions of the same response and analyzing how consistent they are with each other. If the assistant's responses vary significantly, it likely means the assistant is uncertain about the topic, and the information provided may be unreliable.
The researchers found that textsc{Luq} is better at identifying potentially inaccurate responses than other existing methods, especially for longer responses. They also discovered that virtual assistants tend to be less confident when discussing rare or obscure facts, and more advanced assistants like GPT-4 are more likely to outright refuse to answer questions they are unsure about.
Critical Analysis
While the textsc{Luq} method shows promise, it is worth noting that it relies on the assumption that inconsistencies in an LLM's responses indicate uncertainty and potential inaccuracies. However, it is possible that an LLM could generate consistent but still nonfactual responses, particularly if its training data contained misinformation.
Additionally, the study focuses on evaluating textsc{Luq} using factuality scores, which may not capture all aspects of response quality, such as coherence, relevance, and pragmatic appropriateness.
Another potential limitation is that the study primarily investigates the behavior of LLMs on factual questions. It remains unclear how well textsc{Luq} would perform in assessing uncertainty for other types of tasks, such as creative writing or opinion generation.
Conclusion
The development of textsc{Luq} represents a promising step towards improving the reliability of LLM-generated content, particularly for long-form responses. By quantifying uncertainty, textsc{Luq} can help identify potentially inaccurate or unreliable information, allowing for further verification or refinement.
However, it is important to recognize the limitations of this approach and to continue exploring other methods for enhancing the factual accuracy and overall quality of LLM outputs.
Questions to Consider
- How might textsc{Luq} be adapted to assess uncertainty in non-factual tasks, such as creative writing or opinion generation?
- What additional measures or techniques could be employed to further improve the factual accuracy of LLM responses, beyond uncertainty quantification?
- How can we ensure that the training data for LLMs is reliable and free from misinformation, which could potentially undermine the effectiveness of methods like textsc{Luq}?
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models
Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, Jimeng Sun
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) specializing in natural language generation (NLG) have recently started exhibiting promising capabilities across a variety of domains. However, gauging the trustworthiness of responses generated by LLMs remains an open challenge, with limited research on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for NLG. Furthermore, existing literature typically assumes white-box access to language models, which is becoming unrealistic either due to the closed-source nature of the latest LLMs or computational constraints. In this work, we investigate UQ in NLG for *black-box* LLMs. We first differentiate *uncertainty* vs *confidence*: the former refers to the ``dispersion'' of the potential predictions for a fixed input, and the latter refers to the confidence on a particular prediction/generation. We then propose and compare several confidence/uncertainty measures, applying them to *selective NLG* where unreliable results could either be ignored or yielded for further assessment. Experiments were carried out with several popular LLMs on question-answering datasets (for evaluation purposes). Results reveal that a simple measure for the semantic dispersion can be a reliable predictor of the quality of LLM responses, providing valuable insights for practitioners on uncertainty management when adopting LLMs. The code to replicate our experiments is available at https://github.com/zlin7/UQ-NLG.
5/21/2024
💬
Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph
Roman Vashurin, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Artem Vazhentsev, Akim Tsvigun, Daniil Vasilev, Rui Xing, Abdelrahman Boda Sadallah, Lyudmila Rvanova, Sergey Petrakov, Alexander Panchenko, Timothy Baldwin, Preslav Nakov, Maxim Panov, Artem Shelmanov
0
0
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is becoming increasingly recognized as a critical component of applications that rely on machine learning (ML). The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has stimulated researchers to seek efficient and effective approaches to UQ in text generation tasks, as in addition to their emerging capabilities, these models have introduced new challenges for building safe applications. As with other ML models, LLMs are prone to make incorrect predictions, ``hallucinate'' by fabricating claims, or simply generate low-quality output for a given input. UQ is a key element in dealing with these challenges. However research to date on UQ methods for LLMs has been fragmented, with disparate evaluation methods. In this work, we tackle this issue by introducing a novel benchmark that implements a collection of state-of-the-art UQ baselines, and provides an environment for controllable and consistent evaluation of novel techniques by researchers in various text generation tasks. Our benchmark also supports the assessment of confidence normalization methods in terms of their ability to provide interpretable scores. Using our benchmark, we conduct a large-scale empirical investigation of UQ and normalization techniques across nine tasks and shed light on the most promising approaches.
6/26/2024
💬
Uncertainty Quantification for In-Context Learning of Large Language Models
Chen Ling, Xujiang Zhao, Xuchao Zhang, Wei Cheng, Yanchi Liu, Yiyou Sun, Mika Oishi, Takao Osaki, Katsushi Matsuda, Jie Ji, Guangji Bai, Liang Zhao, Haifeng Chen
0
0
In-context learning has emerged as a groundbreaking ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) and revolutionized various fields by providing a few task-relevant demonstrations in the prompt. However, trustworthy issues with LLM's response, such as hallucination, have also been actively discussed. Existing works have been devoted to quantifying the uncertainty in LLM's response, but they often overlook the complex nature of LLMs and the uniqueness of in-context learning. In this work, we delve into the predictive uncertainty of LLMs associated with in-context learning, highlighting that such uncertainties may stem from both the provided demonstrations (aleatoric uncertainty) and ambiguities tied to the model's configurations (epistemic uncertainty). We propose a novel formulation and corresponding estimation method to quantify both types of uncertainties. The proposed method offers an unsupervised way to understand the prediction of in-context learning in a plug-and-play fashion. Extensive experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the decomposition. The code and data are available at: https://github.com/lingchen0331/UQ_ICL.
4/1/2024
Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Models
Jinhao Duan, Hao Cheng, Shiqi Wang, Alex Zavalny, Chenan Wang, Renjing Xu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Kaidi Xu
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) show promising results in language generation and instruction following but frequently hallucinate, making their outputs less reliable. Despite Uncertainty Quantification's (UQ) potential solutions, implementing it accurately within LLMs is challenging. Our research introduces a simple heuristic: not all tokens in auto-regressive LLM text equally represent the underlying meaning, as linguistic redundancy often allows a few keywords to convey the essence of long sentences. However, current methods underestimate this inequality when assessing uncertainty, causing tokens with limited semantics to be equally or excessively weighted in UQ. To correct this, we propose Shifting Attention to more Relevant (SAR) components at both token- and sentence-levels for better UQ. We conduct extensive experiments involving a range of popular off-the-shelf LLMs, such as Vicuna, WizardLM, and LLaMA-2-chat, with model sizes extending up to 33B parameters. We evaluate various free-form question-answering tasks, encompassing domains such as reading comprehension, science Q&A, and medical Q&A. Our experimental results, coupled with a comprehensive demographic analysis, demonstrate the superior performance of SAR. The code is available at https://github.com/jinhaoduan/SAR.
5/30/2024