Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in natural language generation (NLG)
• Assessing the trustworthiness of LLM-generated responses is an open challenge, with limited research on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for NLG
• Existing UQ methods typically assume white-box access to language models, which is becoming unrealistic due to closed-source models or computational constraints
• This paper investigates UQ in NLG for LLMs

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are advanced AI systems that can generate human-like text on a variety of topics. While these models have become increasingly capable, it's not always clear how reliable or trustworthy their responses are. This is an important challenge, as we want to be able to trust the information and outputs generated by these powerful AI systems.

The researchers in this paper wanted to explore ways of quantifying the

and of LLM responses, even when we don't have full access to the inner workings of the model (a "black-box" scenario). They distinguish between uncertainty, which refers to the potential range of predictions for a given input, and confidence, which is how sure the model is about a particular prediction or generation.

The researchers tested several different methods for measuring uncertainty and confidence, and applied them to LLMs performing question-answering tasks. The goal was to see if these uncertainty measures could help identify when the LLM's responses might be unreliable, so that they could be ignored or flagged for further review. The results revealed that a simple measure of the semantic dispersion of the model's potential responses could be a good way to predict the quality of the LLM's output.

This work provides valuable insights for practitioners who want to adopt LLMs while managing the uncertainty and reliability of the systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first differentiated between

and in the context of NLG. Uncertainty refers to the "dispersion" or range of potential predictions for a given input, while confidence is the model's certainty about a particular prediction or generation.

To investigate UQ for

LLMs, the researchers proposed and compared several confidence and uncertainty measures. These were applied to , where unreliable results could be ignored or flagged for further assessment. Experiments were conducted using popular LLMs on question-answering datasets.

The results reveal that a simple measure of semantic dispersion can be a reliable predictor of the quality of LLM responses. This provides valuable insights for practitioners adopting LLMs on how to manage the uncertainty of these powerful language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a practical approach to addressing the challenge of uncertainty quantification for black-box LLMs, which is becoming increasingly relevant as the latest, most capable models are often closed-source. By differentiating between uncertainty and confidence, the researchers were able to explore various measures that could be applied without needing full access to the model.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations or caveats of the proposed methods. It would be useful to understand the specific scenarios or contexts where the uncertainty measures may be less reliable, or cases where they could be susceptible to biases or other issues. Additionally, the paper could have discussed potential avenues for further research, such as exploring more sophisticated UQ techniques or investigating the generalizability of the findings to a broader range of LLM architectures and tasks.

Overall, this work provides a valuable contribution to the field of uncertainty quantification for large language models, and the insights on confidence and uncertainty management could be beneficial for practitioners looking to safely harness the power of LLMs.

Conclusion

This paper investigates uncertainty quantification (UQ) for natural language generation (NLG) in the context of

large language models (LLMs). The researchers differentiated between and , and proposed several measures to assess these qualities in LLM responses.

The experimental results revealed that a simple measure of semantic dispersion can be a reliable predictor of LLM response quality, providing valuable insights for practitioners adopting these powerful language models and needing to manage the uncertainty of their outputs.

This work contributes to the broader research on uncertainty quantification for large language models and benchmarking LLM capabilities through uncertainty-aware methods, which is crucial as these advanced AI systems become more widely adopted.