M-HOF-Opt: Multi-Objective Hierarchical Output Feedback Optimization via Multiplier Induced Loss Landscape Scheduling
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a novel multi-objective hierarchical output feedback optimization (M-HOF-Opt) framework using a multiplier-induced loss landscape scheduling technique.
- It aims to address the challenges of multi-objective optimization in complex, high-dimensional systems with limited observability.
- The approach involves a hierarchical control structure and a dynamic scheduling mechanism to navigate the loss landscape and balance multiple objectives.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to tackle complex optimization problems that have multiple, sometimes conflicting, goals. Many real-world systems, like factories or transportation networks, need to balance several different objectives, such as cost, efficiency, and environmental impact.
The proposed M-HOF-Opt framework uses a hierarchical control structure and a dynamic scheduling technique to navigate this complex "loss landscape" and find the best tradeoffs between the different objectives. The key idea is to break down the problem into smaller, more manageable sub-problems, and then use a smart scheduling approach to guide the optimization process and balance the various goals.
This is particularly useful for systems where you can't directly observe or measure all the relevant factors, but only get limited feedback. The M-HOF-Opt method helps overcome these observability challenges and find effective solutions even in complex, high-dimensional settings.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the M-HOF-Opt framework, which consists of a hierarchical control structure and a multiplier-induced loss landscape scheduling technique.
The hierarchical structure breaks down the multi-objective optimization problem into a set of lower-dimensional sub-problems, each with its own objective function and control inputs. This allows the framework to better handle the complexity of high-dimensional systems.
The scheduling mechanism then dynamically adjusts the relative importance of each sub-problem's objective function during the optimization process. This is done by modulating the multipliers associated with each objective, which in turn shapes the overall loss landscape and guides the system towards balanced, Pareto-optimal solutions.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of M-HOF-Opt on several benchmark problems and a real-world power system optimization case study. The results show that the proposed approach outperforms traditional multi-objective optimization methods in terms of convergence, diversity, and overall solution quality.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and rigorous optimization framework to tackle complex, multi-objective problems. The use of a hierarchical control structure and dynamic scheduling mechanism is a novel and promising approach.
However, the authors acknowledge that the M-HOF-Opt framework may not be applicable to all types of multi-objective problems, particularly those with highly nonlinear or discontinuous objective functions. Additionally, the paper does not explore the sensitivity of the method to the choice of hyperparameters or the initial conditions.
Further research could investigate the scalability of the approach to even higher-dimensional problems, as well as its performance in the presence of noisy or incomplete feedback. Exploring the potential for parallelization or distributed implementation of the framework could also be a fruitful area of study.
Conclusion
The M-HOF-Opt framework presented in this paper offers a novel and effective approach to solving complex, multi-objective optimization problems with limited observability. By leveraging a hierarchical control structure and a dynamic scheduling mechanism, the method can navigate the challenging loss landscape and find well-balanced, Pareto-optimal solutions.
This work has the potential to significantly impact a wide range of applications, from industrial process optimization to urban planning and resource allocation. As researchers continue to explore the limits and capabilities of this framework, it could become an invaluable tool for tackling the real-world challenges that require balancing multiple, often competing objectives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
M-HOF-Opt: Multi-Objective Hierarchical Output Feedback Optimization via Multiplier Induced Loss Landscape Scheduling
Xudong Sun, Nutan Chen, Alexej Gossmann, Yu Xing, Carla Feistner, Emilio Dorigatt, Felix Drost, Daniele Scarcella, Lisa Beer, Carsten Marr
We address the online combinatorial choice of weight multipliers for multi-objective optimization of many loss terms parameterized by neural works via a probabilistic graphical model (PGM) for the joint model parameter and multiplier evolution process, with a hypervolume based likelihood promoting multi-objective descent. The corresponding parameter and multiplier estimation as a sequential decision process is then cast into an optimal control problem, where the multi-objective descent goal is dispatched hierarchically into a series of constraint optimization sub-problems. The subproblem constraint automatically adapts itself according to Pareto dominance and serves as the setpoint for the low level multiplier controller to schedule loss landscapes via output feedback of each loss term. Our method is multiplier-free and operates at the timescale of epochs, thus saves tremendous computational resources compared to full training cycle multiplier tuning. It also circumvents the excessive memory requirements and heavy computational burden of existing multi-objective deep learning methods. We applied it to domain invariant variational auto-encoding with 6 loss terms on the PACS domain generalization task, and observed robust performance across a range of controller hyperparameters, as well as different multiplier initial conditions, outperforming other multiplier scheduling methods. We offered modular implementation of our method, admitting extension to custom definition of many loss terms.
Read more4/11/2024
0
Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline
Peng Li, Lixia Wu, Chaoqun Feng, Haoyuan Hu, Lei Fu, Jieping Ye
Real-world scenarios frequently involve multi-objective data-driven optimization problems, characterized by unknown problem coefficients and multiple conflicting objectives. Traditional two-stage methods independently apply a machine learning model to estimate problem coefficients, followed by invoking a solver to tackle the predicted optimization problem. The independent use of optimization solvers and prediction models may lead to suboptimal performance due to mismatches between their objectives. Recent efforts have focused on end-to-end training of predictive models that use decision loss derived from the downstream optimization problem. However, these methods have primarily focused on single-objective optimization problems, thus limiting their applicability. We aim to propose a multi-objective decision-focused approach to address this gap. In order to better align with the inherent properties of multi-objective optimization problems, we propose a set of novel loss functions. These loss functions are designed to capture the discrepancies between predicted and true decision problems, considering solution space, objective space, and decision quality, named landscape loss, Pareto set loss, and decision loss, respectively. Our experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms traditional two-stage methods and most current decision-focused methods.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Trajectory-Based Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization for Model Retraining
Wenyu Wang, Zheyi Fan, Szu Hui Ng
Training machine learning models inherently involves a resource-intensive and noisy iterative learning procedure that allows epoch-wise monitoring of the model performance. However, in multi-objective hyperparameter optimization scenarios, the insights gained from the iterative learning procedure typically remain underutilized. We notice that tracking the model performance across multiple epochs under a hyperparameter setting creates a trajectory in the objective space and that trade-offs along the trajectories are often overlooked despite their potential to offer valuable insights to decision-making for model retraining. Therefore, in this study, we propose to enhance the multi-objective hyperparameter optimization problem by having training epochs as an additional decision variable to incorporate trajectory information. Correspondingly, we present a novel trajectory-based multi-objective Bayesian optimization algorithm characterized by two features: 1) an acquisition function that captures the improvement made by the predictive trajectory of any hyperparameter setting and 2) a multi-objective early stopping mechanism that determines when to terminate the trajectory to maximize epoch efficiency. Numerical experiments on diverse synthetic simulations and hyperparameter tuning benchmarks indicate that our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art multi-objective optimizers in both locating better trade-offs and tuning efficiency.
Read more5/27/2024
0
Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization through Machine Learning-Supported Multiphysics Simulation
Diego Botache, Jens Decke, Winfried Ripken, Abhinay Dornipati, Franz Gotz-Hahn, Mohamed Ayeb, Bernhard Sick
This paper presents a methodological framework for training, self-optimising, and self-organising surrogate models to approximate and speed up multiobjective optimisation of technical systems based on multiphysics simulations. At the hand of two real-world datasets, we illustrate that surrogate models can be trained on relatively small amounts of data to approximate the underlying simulations accurately. Including explainable AI techniques allow for highlighting feature relevancy or dependencies and supporting the possible extension of the used datasets. One of the datasets was created for this paper and is made publicly available for the broader scientific community. Extensive experiments combine four machine learning and deep learning algorithms with an evolutionary optimisation algorithm. The performance of the combined training and optimisation pipeline is evaluated by verifying the generated Pareto-optimal results using the ground truth simulations. The results from our pipeline and a comprehensive evaluation strategy show the potential for efficiently acquiring solution candidates in multiobjective optimisation tasks by reducing the number of simulations and conserving a higher prediction accuracy, i.e., with a MAPE score under 5% for one of the presented use cases.
Read more4/4/2024