Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline
2406.00779
0
0
Abstract
Real-world scenarios frequently involve multi-objective data-driven optimization problems, characterized by unknown problem coefficients and multiple conflicting objectives. Traditional two-stage methods independently apply a machine learning model to estimate problem coefficients, followed by invoking a solver to tackle the predicted optimization problem. The independent use of optimization solvers and prediction models may lead to suboptimal performance due to mismatches between their objectives. Recent efforts have focused on end-to-end training of predictive models that use decision loss derived from the downstream optimization problem. However, these methods have primarily focused on single-objective optimization problems, thus limiting their applicability. We aim to propose a multi-objective decision-focused approach to address this gap. In order to better align with the inherent properties of multi-objective optimization problems, we propose a set of novel loss functions. These loss functions are designed to capture the discrepancies between predicted and true decision problems, considering solution space, objective space, and decision quality, named landscape loss, Pareto set loss, and decision loss, respectively. Our experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms traditional two-stage methods and most current decision-focused methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores a differentiated data-driven decision pipeline that can handle multiple objectives simultaneously.
- The pipeline leverages machine learning techniques to enhance multi-objective optimization and decision-making processes.
- The paper proposes novel approaches to address challenges in multi-objective optimization, including Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization Through Machine Learning, M-HOF Opt: Multi-Objective Hierarchical Output, and Reduced-Rank Multi-Objective Policy Learning Optimization.
- The research also explores the use of Output-Constrained Decision Trees to balance multiple objectives in a decision-making context.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new approach to making decisions when there are multiple, potentially conflicting, goals or objectives. Imagine you're trying to decide which car to buy - you might want a car that is affordable, fuel-efficient, and also has a lot of features. These goals can sometimes work against each other, making it challenging to find the best compromise.
The researchers in this paper have developed a system that uses machine learning to help navigate these trade-offs. Their "data-driven decision pipeline" takes in information about the problem, learns from past examples, and then suggests decisions that balance the multiple objectives as best as possible.
For example, the pipeline might analyze data on past car purchases to learn how different features, prices, and fuel efficiency levels relate to customer satisfaction. It could then use this knowledge to recommend a car that hits a sweet spot - not the absolute best on any one factor, but a good overall compromise that satisfies the key priorities.
The paper also discusses specific techniques the researchers used to make this multi-objective optimization more effective, like Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization Through Machine Learning and M-HOF Opt: Multi-Objective Hierarchical Output. These innovations help the system better understand the trade-offs and make more nuanced decisions.
Overall, this research takes an important step towards building decision-making systems that can juggle multiple, sometimes conflicting goals in a thoughtful and effective way. This could have applications in areas like product design, urban planning, healthcare resource allocation, and many other complex decision-making scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The core of this research is a "differentiated data-driven decision pipeline" that can handle multiple, potentially competing objectives simultaneously. This pipeline leverages machine learning techniques to enhance multi-objective optimization and decision-making processes.
A key innovation is the use of Reduced-Rank Multi-Objective Policy Learning Optimization, which allows the system to learn a compressed representation of the decision space. This helps it navigate the trade-offs between objectives more effectively.
The researchers also explore the application of Output-Constrained Decision Trees to balance multiple objectives in a decision-making context. This approach constructs decision trees that optimize for multiple, potentially conflicting targets.
Additionally, the paper investigates techniques like Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization Through Machine Learning and M-HOF Opt: Multi-Objective Hierarchical Output to improve the overall effectiveness of the multi-objective optimization process.
Through experiments on benchmark datasets, the authors demonstrate the capabilities of their differentiated data-driven decision pipeline in handling complex multi-objective scenarios. The results highlight the potential of this approach to unlock new possibilities in areas where traditional single-objective decision-making falls short.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive approach to tackling multi-objective decision-making challenges, but it acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.
One key limitation is the computational complexity of the proposed methods, especially as the number of objectives and decision variables increases. The researchers suggest exploring ways to further optimize the efficiency of the algorithms to make them more scalable.
Additionally, the paper notes that the performance of the decision pipeline is heavily dependent on the quality and representativeness of the training data. Developing effective data collection and preprocessing strategies to ensure the robustness of the system in real-world applications is an important area for future work.
The authors also highlight the need to incorporate more intuitive and interpretable decision-making models, as the current techniques may struggle to provide clear explanations for their recommendations. Integrating Explainable AI approaches could help address this challenge.
Furthermore, the paper emphasizes the importance of validating the proposed methods in diverse real-world scenarios, beyond the benchmark datasets used in the experiments. Assessing the generalizability and practical applicability of the differentiated data-driven decision pipeline is crucial for its widespread adoption.
Overall, the research presented in this paper is a significant step forward in the field of multi-objective decision-making. By leveraging advanced machine learning techniques, the authors have demonstrated the potential to create more sophisticated and nuanced decision support systems. Addressing the identified limitations and continuing to refine the approaches could lead to even more impactful applications in the future.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a differentiated data-driven decision pipeline that can effectively handle multiple, potentially conflicting objectives. By incorporating novel machine learning techniques, the pipeline aims to enhance the optimization and decision-making processes in complex, multi-objective scenarios.
The key innovations explored in the paper include Reduced-Rank Multi-Objective Policy Learning Optimization, the application of Output-Constrained Decision Trees, and the integration of methods like Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization Through Machine Learning and M-HOF Opt: Multi-Objective Hierarchical Output.
The experimental results demonstrate the potential of this differentiated data-driven decision pipeline to navigate the trade-offs between multiple objectives, opening up new possibilities in areas where traditional single-objective decision-making approaches fall short. However, the paper also identifies several limitations and areas for further research, such as improving computational efficiency, enhancing data quality, and increasing the interpretability of the decision-making models.
Overall, this research represents a significant contribution to the field of multi-objective optimization and decision-making. By leveraging advanced machine learning techniques, the authors have taken a step towards more sophisticated and nuanced decision support systems that can better balance competing priorities in complex real-world scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
Decision-Focused Forecasting: Decision Losses for Multistage Optimisation
Egon Perv{s}ak, Miguel F. Anjos
0
0
Decision-focused learning has emerged as a promising approach for decision making under uncertainty by training the upstream predictive aspect of the pipeline with respect to the quality of the downstream decisions. Most existing work has focused on single stage problems. Many real-world decision problems are more appropriately modelled using multistage optimisation as contextual information such as prices or demand is revealed over time and decisions now have a bearing on future decisions. We propose decision-focused forecasting, a multiple-implicitlayer model which in its training accounts for the intertemporal decision effects of forecasts using differentiable optimisation. The recursive model reflects a fully differentiable multistage optimisation approach. We present an analysis of the gradients produced by this model showing the adjustments made to account for the state-path caused by forecasting. We demonstrate an application of the model to an energy storage arbitrage task and report that our model outperforms existing approaches.
5/24/2024
🛠️
Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine Learning -- An Overview
Florian Karl, Tobias Pielok, Julia Moosbauer, Florian Pfisterer, Stefan Coors, Martin Binder, Lennart Schneider, Janek Thomas, Jakob Richter, Michel Lang, Eduardo C. Garrido-Merch'an, Juergen Branke, Bernd Bischl
0
0
Hyperparameter optimization constitutes a large part of typical modern machine learning workflows. This arises from the fact that machine learning methods and corresponding preprocessing steps often only yield optimal performance when hyperparameters are properly tuned. But in many applications, we are not only interested in optimizing ML pipelines solely for predictive accuracy; additional metrics or constraints must be considered when determining an optimal configuration, resulting in a multi-objective optimization problem. This is often neglected in practice, due to a lack of knowledge and readily available software implementations for multi-objective hyperparameter optimization. In this work, we introduce the reader to the basics of multi-objective hyperparameter optimization and motivate its usefulness in applied ML. Furthermore, we provide an extensive survey of existing optimization strategies, both from the domain of evolutionary algorithms and Bayesian optimization. We illustrate the utility of MOO in several specific ML applications, considering objectives such as operating conditions, prediction time, sparseness, fairness, interpretability and robustness.
6/7/2024
Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization through Machine Learning-Supported Multiphysics Simulation
Diego Botache, Jens Decke, Winfried Ripken, Abhinay Dornipati, Franz Gotz-Hahn, Mohamed Ayeb, Bernhard Sick
0
0
This paper presents a methodological framework for training, self-optimising, and self-organising surrogate models to approximate and speed up multiobjective optimisation of technical systems based on multiphysics simulations. At the hand of two real-world datasets, we illustrate that surrogate models can be trained on relatively small amounts of data to approximate the underlying simulations accurately. Including explainable AI techniques allow for highlighting feature relevancy or dependencies and supporting the possible extension of the used datasets. One of the datasets was created for this paper and is made publicly available for the broader scientific community. Extensive experiments combine four machine learning and deep learning algorithms with an evolutionary optimisation algorithm. The performance of the combined training and optimisation pipeline is evaluated by verifying the generated Pareto-optimal results using the ground truth simulations. The results from our pipeline and a comprehensive evaluation strategy show the potential for efficiently acquiring solution candidates in multiobjective optimisation tasks by reducing the number of simulations and conserving a higher prediction accuracy, i.e., with a MAPE score under 5% for one of the presented use cases.
4/4/2024
Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization
Ezinne Nwankwo, Michael I. Jordan, Angela Zhou
0
0
Evaluating the causal impacts of possible interventions is crucial for informing decision-making, especially towards improving access to opportunity. However, if causal effects are heterogeneous and predictable from covariates, personalized treatment decisions can improve individual outcomes and contribute to both efficiency and equity. In practice, however, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori and often collect multiple outcomes of interest that are noisy estimates of the true target of interest. For example, in government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty. The ultimate goal is to learn an optimal treatment policy that in some sense maximizes multiple outcomes simultaneously. To address such issues, we present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning with multiple objectives. We learn a low-dimensional representation of the true outcome from the observed outcomes using reduced rank regression. We develop a suite of estimates that use the model to denoise observed outcomes, including commonly-used index weightings. These methods improve estimation error in policy evaluation and optimization, including on a case study of real-world cash transfer and social intervention data. Reducing the variance of noisy social outcomes can improve the performance of algorithmic allocations.
4/30/2024