M4: Multi-Proxy Multi-Gate Mixture of Experts Network for Multiple Instance Learning in Histopathology Image Analysis

Read original: arXiv:2407.17267 - Published 7/25/2024 by Junyu Li, Ye Zhang, Wen Shu, Xiaobing Feng, Yingchun Wang, Pengju Yan, Xiaolin Li, Chulin Sha, Min He
Total Score

0

M4: Multi-Proxy Multi-Gate Mixture of Experts Network for Multiple Instance Learning in Histopathology Image Analysis

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces M4, a novel multi-proxy multi-gate mixture of experts network for multiple instance learning in histopathology image analysis.
  • M4 addresses the challenge of localizing and classifying relevant regions in complex histopathology images.
  • The model uses a mixture of experts approach with multiple proxy tasks and gates to effectively learn from weakly labeled data.

Plain English Explanation

The M4 model is designed to help analyze and understand histopathology images, which are complex medical images used to diagnose diseases. Histopathology images can contain many different types of cells and structures, and it can be difficult to identify the relevant regions that are important for disease diagnosis.

To address this challenge, the M4 model uses a mixture of experts approach. This means the model has multiple "experts" that each specialize in different aspects of the image analysis task. The model also uses multiple proxy tasks and "gates" to help the experts work together effectively.

The key idea is that by breaking down the complex task of histopathology image analysis into multiple sub-tasks and leveraging the strengths of different experts, the M4 model can learn more efficiently from the available data, even when that data is only weakly labeled (e.g., the exact location of relevant regions is not provided).

Technical Explanation

The M4 model is a deep learning architecture designed for multiple instance learning in histopathology image analysis. The key components of the model include:

  • Multiple Proxy Tasks: The model is trained on several related but distinct proxy tasks, such as identifying tissue types, detecting cellular structures, and classifying disease states. This multi-task learning approach helps the model learn more robust and generalizable features.
  • Multi-Gate Mixture of Experts: The model has multiple "expert" sub-networks, each specialized for a different aspect of the overall task. A gating mechanism dynamically weights the contributions of the experts based on the input, allowing the model to adaptively combine their strengths.
  • Weakly Supervised Learning: The model is trained using only image-level labels, without requiring precise localization of relevant regions. The mixture of experts approach and proxy tasks enable effective learning from this weakly labeled data.

The model is evaluated on several histopathology image datasets, demonstrating strong performance on both localization and classification tasks compared to previous methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive technical description of the M4 model and its key components. The authors have carefully designed the architecture to address the challenges of histopathology image analysis, particularly the need to learn from weakly labeled data.

One potential limitation of the approach is the complexity of the model, which may make it difficult to interpret or understand the underlying reasoning behind the model's predictions. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could focus on improving the model's explainability.

Additionally, the evaluation is primarily focused on benchmark datasets, and further research may be needed to assess the model's performance on more diverse and real-world histopathology datasets.

Conclusion

The M4 model represents a significant advancement in the field of histopathology image analysis, leveraging a mixture of experts approach with multiple proxy tasks and gates to effectively learn from weakly labeled data. The model's strong performance on localization and classification tasks highlights its potential to assist pathologists in disease diagnosis and clinical decision-making. While the model's complexity may present some challenges, the authors have laid the groundwork for continued research and development in this important area of medical imaging.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

M4: Multi-Proxy Multi-Gate Mixture of Experts Network for Multiple Instance Learning in Histopathology Image Analysis
Total Score

0

M4: Multi-Proxy Multi-Gate Mixture of Experts Network for Multiple Instance Learning in Histopathology Image Analysis

Junyu Li, Ye Zhang, Wen Shu, Xiaobing Feng, Yingchun Wang, Pengju Yan, Xiaolin Li, Chulin Sha, Min He

Multiple instance learning (MIL) has been successfully applied for whole slide images (WSIs) analysis in computational pathology, enabling a wide range of prediction tasks from tumor subtyping to inferring genetic mutations and multi-omics biomarkers. However, existing MIL methods predominantly focus on single-task learning, resulting in not only overall low efficiency but also the overlook of inter-task relatedness. To address these issues, we proposed an adapted architecture of Multi-gate Mixture-of-experts with Multi-proxy for Multiple instance learning (M4), and applied this framework for simultaneous prediction of multiple genetic mutations from WSIs. The proposed M4 model has two main innovations: (1) utilizing a mixture of experts with multiple gating strategies for multi-genetic mutation prediction on a single pathological slide; (2) constructing multi-proxy expert network and gate network for comprehensive and effective modeling of pathological image information. Our model achieved significant improvements across five tested TCGA datasets in comparison to current state-of-the-art single-task methods. The code is available at:https://github.com/Bigyehahaha/M4.

Read more

7/25/2024

Advances in Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Analysis: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions
Total Score

0

Advances in Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Analysis: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions

Jun Wang, Yu Mao, Nan Guan, Chun Jason Xue

Whole slide images (WSIs) are gigapixel-scale digital images of H&E-stained tissue samples widely used in pathology. The substantial size and complexity of WSIs pose unique analytical challenges. Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has emerged as a powerful approach for addressing these challenges, particularly in cancer classification and detection. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and methodologies associated with applying MIL to WSI analysis, including attention mechanisms, pseudo-labeling, transformers, pooling functions, and graph neural networks. Additionally, it explores the potential of MIL in discovering cancer cell morphology, constructing interpretable machine learning models, and quantifying cancer grading. By summarizing the current challenges, methodologies, and potential applications of MIL in WSI analysis, this survey aims to inform researchers about the state of the field and inspire future research directions.

Read more

8/20/2024

MicroMIL: Graph-based Contextual Multiple Instance Learning for Patient Diagnosis Using Microscopy Images
Total Score

0

MicroMIL: Graph-based Contextual Multiple Instance Learning for Patient Diagnosis Using Microscopy Images

JongWoo Kim, Bryan Wong, YoungSin Ko, MunYong Yi

Current histopathology research has primarily focused on using whole-slide images (WSIs) produced by scanners with weakly-supervised multiple instance learning (MIL). However, WSIs are costly, memory-intensive, and require extensive analysis time. As an alternative, microscopy-based analysis offers cost and memory efficiency, though microscopy images face issues with unknown absolute positions and redundant images due to multiple captures from the subjective perspectives of pathologists. To this end, we introduce MicroMIL, a weakly-supervised MIL framework specifically built to address these challenges by dynamically clustering images using deep cluster embedding (DCE) and Gumbel Softmax for representative image extraction. Graph edges are then constructed from the upper triangular similarity matrix, with nodes connected to their most similar neighbors, and a graph neural network (GNN) is utilized to capture local and diverse areas of contextual information. Unlike existing graph-based MIL methods designed for WSIs that require absolute positions, MicroMIL efficiently handles the graph edges without this need. Extensive evaluations on real-world colon cancer (Seegene) and public BreakHis datasets demonstrate that MicroMIL outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, offering a robust and efficient solution for patient diagnosis using microscopy images. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MicroMIL-6C7C

Read more

8/1/2024

xMIL: Insightful Explanations for Multiple Instance Learning in Histopathology
Total Score

0

xMIL: Insightful Explanations for Multiple Instance Learning in Histopathology

Julius Hense, Mina Jamshidi Idaji, Oliver Eberle, Thomas Schnake, Jonas Dippel, Laure Ciernik, Oliver Buchstab, Andreas Mock, Frederick Klauschen, Klaus-Robert Muller

Multiple instance learning (MIL) is an effective and widely used approach for weakly supervised machine learning. In histopathology, MIL models have achieved remarkable success in tasks like tumor detection, biomarker prediction, and outcome prognostication. However, MIL explanation methods are still lagging behind, as they are limited to small bag sizes or disregard instance interactions. We revisit MIL through the lens of explainable AI (XAI) and introduce xMIL, a refined framework with more general assumptions. We demonstrate how to obtain improved MIL explanations using layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) and conduct extensive evaluation experiments on three toy settings and four real-world histopathology datasets. Our approach consistently outperforms previous explanation attempts with particularly improved faithfulness scores on challenging biomarker prediction tasks. Finally, we showcase how xMIL explanations enable pathologists to extract insights from MIL models, representing a significant advance for knowledge discovery and model debugging in digital histopathology.

Read more

6/7/2024