A Machine Learning-based Approach for Solving Recurrence Relations and its use in Cost Analysis of Logic Programs
0
👁️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to solving arbitrary, constrained recurrence relations that arise in static cost analysis of logic programs.
- Static cost analysis infers information about the resources used by programs without actually running them with concrete data, and expresses this as functions of input data sizes.
- Many existing tools for static cost analysis, like CiaoPP, rely on solving recurrence relations to find closed-form functions representing the computational cost of program predicates.
- However, solving these recurrence relations is often a bottleneck, as many cannot be solved by state-of-the-art computer algebra systems.
- The authors develop a machine learning-based approach to guessing candidate closed-form solutions, which are then verified using a combination of SMT-solving and computer algebra.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a program that performs some task, and you want to know how much computing power or time it will require, without actually running the program. This is called static cost analysis. The researchers in this paper found a new way to do this for a certain type of program called logic programs.
To figure out the cost of a logic program, analysts often set up mathematical equations called recurrence relations that describe the program's behavior. Solving these recurrence relations can give you a formula that predicts the program's cost based on its inputs.
However, solving these recurrence relations is really hard, and many of them can't be solved by even the most advanced math software. The authors of this paper came up with a clever solution: they use machine learning to guess what the solution might be, and then use other math tools to check if their guess is correct.
This new approach allows the authors to solve many more recurrence relations than previous methods, which means they can do better static cost analysis for a wider range of logic programs. It's an important step forward for understanding the resource requirements of programs without actually running them.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to solving the recurrence relation solving bottleneck that arises in many static cost analysis tools for logic programs, such as CiaoPP.
The core idea is to use machine learning techniques, specifically sparse-linear and symbolic regression, to
The authors' prototype implementation and experimental evaluation within the CiaoPP system show that this approach outperforms state-of-the-art cost analyzers and recurrence solvers, and is able to solve recurrences that previous methods could not.
The key technical contributions include:
- A general approach for solving arbitrary, constrained recurrence relations using machine learning and verification techniques.
- Novel use of sparse-linear and symbolic regression to guess candidate closed-form solutions.
- Combination of SMT-solving and CAS to check if the guessed solutions are valid.
- Experimental evaluation demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to addressing a significant bottleneck in static cost analysis tools. By leveraging machine learning techniques, the authors are able to solve a broader range of recurrence relations than previous methods, which is a valuable advancement.
However, the paper does not discuss the limitations or potential caveats of the proposed approach in depth. For example, it would be important to understand the types of recurrence relations that the machine learning-based guessing is most effective for, as well as any potential biases or failure modes of the technique.
Additionally, the paper could have provided more insight into the specific machine learning models and training procedures used, as well as a deeper analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the sparse-linear and symbolic regression approaches. This level of technical detail would allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the novelty and robustness of the proposed solution.
Further research could also explore the applicability of this approach to static cost analysis in other programming language domains, beyond just logic programs, as well as potential extensions to handle even more complex or challenging recurrence relations.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel, machine learning-based approach to solving the recurrence relation solving bottleneck that arises in static cost analysis of logic programs. By using sparse-linear and symbolic regression to guess candidate closed-form solutions, and verifying them with SMT-solving and computer algebra, the authors are able to solve a broader range of recurrence relations than previous methods.
The results demonstrate significant improvements in the performance of static cost analysis tools like CiaoPP, which is an important step forward in understanding the resource requirements of programs without actually running them. This work has implications for program synthesis, algorithmic reasoning, and other areas that rely on static analysis of program behavior.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👁️
0
A Machine Learning-based Approach for Solving Recurrence Relations and its use in Cost Analysis of Logic Programs
Louis Rustenholz, Maximiliano Klemen, Miguel 'Angel Carreira-Perpi~n'an, Pedro L'opez-Garc'ia
Automatic static cost analysis infers information about the resources used by programs without actually running them with concrete data, and presents such information as functions of input data sizes. Most of the analysis tools for logic programs (and many for other languages), as CiaoPP, are based on setting up recurrence relations representing (bounds on) the computational cost of predicates, and solving them to find closed-form functions. Such recurrence solving is a bottleneck in current tools: many of the recurrences that arise during the analysis cannot be solved with state-of-the-art solvers, including Computer Algebra Systems (CASs), so that specific methods for different classes of recurrences need to be developed. We address such a challenge by developing a novel, general approach for solving arbitrary, constrained recurrence relations, that uses machine-learning (sparse-linear and symbolic) regression techniques to guess a candidate closed-form function, and a combination of an SMT-solver and a CAS to check if it is actually a solution of the recurrence. Our prototype implementation and its experimental evaluation within the context of the CiaoPP system show quite promising results. Overall, for the considered benchmarks, our approach outperforms state-of-the-art cost analyzers and recurrence solvers, and solves recurrences that cannot be solved by them. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
Read more9/2/2024
0
Inductive Learning of Logical Theories with LLMs: A Complexity-graded Analysis
Jo~ao Pedro Gandarela, Danilo S. Carvalho, Andr'e Freitas
This work presents a novel systematic methodology to analyse the capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) with feedback from a formal inference engine, on logic theory induction. The analysis is complexity-graded w.r.t. rule dependency structure, allowing quantification of specific inference challenges on LLM performance. Integrating LLMs with formal methods is a promising frontier in the Natural Language Processing field, as an important avenue for improving model inference control and explainability. In particular, inductive learning over complex sets of facts and rules, poses unique challenges for current autoregressive models, as they lack explicit symbolic grounding. While they can be complemented by formal systems, the properties delivered by LLMs regarding inductive learning, are not well understood and quantified. Empirical results indicate that the largest LLMs can achieve competitive results against a SOTA Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) system baseline, but also that tracking long predicate relationship chains is a more difficult obstacle than theory complexity for the LLMs.
Read more9/2/2024
0
Arithmetic Reasoning with LLM: Prolog Generation & Permutation
Xiaocheng Yang, Bingsen Chen, Yik-Cheung Tam
Instructing large language models (LLMs) to solve elementary school math problems has shown great success using Chain of Thought (CoT). However, the CoT approach relies on an LLM to generate a sequence of arithmetic calculations which can be prone to cascaded calculation errors. We hypothesize that an LLM should focus on extracting predicates and generating symbolic formulas from the math problem description so that the underlying calculation can be done via an external code interpreter. We investigate using LLM to generate Prolog programs to solve mathematical questions. Experimental results show that our Prolog-based arithmetic problem-solving outperforms CoT generation in the GSM8K benchmark across three distinct LLMs. In addition, given the insensitive ordering of predicates and symbolic formulas in Prolog, we propose to permute the ground truth predicates for more robust LLM training via data augmentation.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Code Simulation Challenges for Large Language Models
Emanuele La Malfa, Christoph Weinhuber, Orazio Torre, Fangru Lin, Samuele Marro, Anthony Cohn, Nigel Shadbolt, Michael Wooldridge
Many reasoning, planning, and problem-solving tasks share an intrinsic algorithmic nature: correctly simulating each step is a sufficient condition to solve them correctly. This work studies to what extent Large Language Models (LLMs) can simulate coding and algorithmic tasks to provide insights into general capabilities in such algorithmic reasoning tasks. We introduce benchmarks for straight-line programs, code that contains critical paths, and approximate and redundant instructions. We further assess the simulation capabilities of LLMs with sorting algorithms and nested loops and show that a routine's computational complexity directly affects an LLM's ability to simulate its execution. While the most powerful LLMs exhibit relatively strong simulation capabilities, the process is fragile, seems to rely heavily on pattern recognition, and is affected by memorisation. We propose a novel off-the-shelf prompting method, Chain of Simulation (CoSm), which instructs LLMs to simulate code execution line by line/follow the computation pattern of compilers. CoSm efficiently helps LLMs reduce memorisation and shallow pattern recognition while improving simulation performance. We consider the success of CoSm in code simulation to be inspirational for other general routine simulation reasoning tasks.
Read more6/13/2024