Arithmetic Reasoning with LLM: Prolog Generation & Permutation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for generating Prolog programs and reasoning about mathematical permutations.
- The authors investigate the ability of LLMs to find mistakes in mathematical reasoning and generate correct Prolog programs.
- The research builds on recent work on using LLMs for faithful logical reasoning and step-by-step mechanistic thinking.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how powerful language models, which are trained on vast amounts of text data, can be used to generate Prolog programs and reason about mathematical problems. Prolog is a programming language that is particularly well-suited for logical reasoning and problem-solving.
The researchers wanted to see if these language models could not only generate correct Prolog code, but also use that code to find mistakes in mathematical reasoning. This builds on previous work that has shown language models can engage in faithful logical reasoning and step-by-step problem-solving.
For example, the language model might be given a description of a mathematical problem, and then it would generate a Prolog program to represent the logic of that problem. It could then use that Prolog program to check if the original reasoning about the problem was correct, and identify any mistakes.
This kind of capability could be very useful in fields like mathematics, computer science, and engineering, where rigorous logical reasoning is essential but can also be error-prone. By harnessing the power of large language models, the researchers hope to develop new tools to enhance human reasoning and problem-solving.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing an overview of the Prolog programming language and its relevance to logical reasoning and problem-solving. It then describes experiments where the researchers used large language models (LLMs) to generate Prolog programs and use them to reason about mathematical permutations.
In the first set of experiments, the authors trained LLMs to generate Prolog programs from natural language descriptions of mathematical problems. They found that the LLMs were able to generate syntactically correct Prolog code that accurately represented the logic of the original problems.
Next, the researchers used the generated Prolog programs to check for mistakes in human-provided solutions to the mathematical problems. By executing the Prolog code, the LLMs were able to identify errors in the original reasoning and provide the correct solutions.
The paper also explores the use of LLMs for generating permutations, a fundamental concept in mathematics. The authors show that LLMs can generate valid permutations and reason about their properties, such as calculating the number of permutations for a given set of elements.
Throughout the experiments, the researchers found that the LLMs were able to effectively combine their language understanding capabilities with the formal reasoning power of Prolog to tackle complex mathematical problems. This work builds on previous research on using LLMs for general-purpose verification and investigating the symbolic capabilities of large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling demonstration of the potential for large language models to engage in formal logical reasoning and problem-solving. By leveraging the strengths of Prolog, the authors have shown that LLMs can not only generate correct programs but also use those programs to identify errors in human reasoning.
However, the research also highlights some limitations and areas for further investigation. For example, the paper does not explore the scalability of this approach to more complex mathematical problems or real-world applications. Additionally, the authors acknowledge that the LLMs may struggle with some aspects of Prolog syntax and semantics, which could limit their reasoning capabilities.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the potential ethical implications of using LLMs for mathematical reasoning and problem-solving. As these models become more powerful, it will be important to consider how they can be deployed safely and responsibly, without undermining human agency or expertise.
Overall, this research represents an exciting step forward in the field of using LLMs for faithful logical reasoning and step-by-step mechanistic thinking. By combining the strengths of language models and formal logical systems, the authors have demonstrated the potential for LLMs to enhance human reasoning and problem-solving in a wide range of domains.
Conclusion
This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for generating Prolog programs and reasoning about mathematical permutations. The researchers found that LLMs can effectively generate syntactically correct Prolog code that accurately represents the logic of mathematical problems, and then use that code to identify mistakes in human reasoning.
This work builds on recent advances in using LLMs for faithful logical reasoning and step-by-step mechanistic thinking, demonstrating the potential for LLMs to enhance human reasoning and problem-solving in fields like mathematics, computer science, and engineering.
While the research presents exciting possibilities, it also highlights the need for further investigation into the scalability and ethical implications of using LLMs for formal logical reasoning. As these models continue to advance, it will be important to ensure they are deployed responsibly and in a way that supports rather than replaces human expertise and agency.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Arithmetic Reasoning with LLM: Prolog Generation & Permutation
Xiaocheng Yang, Bingsen Chen, Yik-Cheung Tam
Instructing large language models (LLMs) to solve elementary school math problems has shown great success using Chain of Thought (CoT). However, the CoT approach relies on an LLM to generate a sequence of arithmetic calculations which can be prone to cascaded calculation errors. We hypothesize that an LLM should focus on extracting predicates and generating symbolic formulas from the math problem description so that the underlying calculation can be done via an external code interpreter. We investigate using LLM to generate Prolog programs to solve mathematical questions. Experimental results show that our Prolog-based arithmetic problem-solving outperforms CoT generation in the GSM8K benchmark across three distinct LLMs. In addition, given the insensitive ordering of predicates and symbolic formulas in Prolog, we propose to permute the ground truth predicates for more robust LLM training via data augmentation.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Thought-Like-Pro: Enhancing Reasoning of Large Language Models through Self-Driven Prolog-based Chain-of-Though
Xiaoyu Tan (INF Technology), Yongxin Deng (Shanghai University of Engineering Science), Xihe Qiu (Shanghai University of Engineering Science), Weidi Xu (INF Technology), Chao Qu (INF Technology), Wei Chu (INF Technology), Yinghui Xu (Fudan University), Yuan Qi (Fudan University)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional performance as general-purpose assistants, excelling across a variety of reasoning tasks. This achievement represents a significant step toward achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). Despite these advancements, the effectiveness of LLMs often hinges on the specific prompting strategies employed, and there remains a lack of a robust framework to facilitate learning and generalization across diverse reasoning tasks. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel learning framework, THOUGHT-LIKE-PRO In this framework, we utilize imitation learning to imitate the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process which is verified and translated from reasoning trajectories generated by a symbolic Prolog logic engine. This framework proceeds in a self-driven manner, that enables LLMs to formulate rules and statements from given instructions and leverage the symbolic Prolog engine to derive results. Subsequently, LLMs convert Prolog-derived successive reasoning trajectories into natural language CoT for imitation learning. Our empirical findings indicate that our proposed approach substantially enhances the reasoning abilities of LLMs and demonstrates robust generalization across out-of-distribution reasoning tasks.
Read more8/13/2024
🔄
0
LLMs can Find Mathematical Reasoning Mistakes by Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought
Zhuoxuan Jiang, Haoyuan Peng, Shanshan Feng, Fan Li, Dongsheng Li
Self-correction is emerging as a promising approach to mitigate the issue of hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs). To facilitate effective self-correction, recent research has proposed mistake detection as its initial step. However, current literature suggests that LLMs often struggle with reliably identifying reasoning mistakes when using simplistic prompting strategies. To address this challenge, we introduce a unique prompting strategy, termed the Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought (PedCoT), which is specifically designed to guide the identification of reasoning mistakes, particularly mathematical reasoning mistakes. PedCoT consists of pedagogical principles for prompts (PPP) design, two-stage interaction process (TIP) and grounded PedCoT prompts, all inspired by the educational theory of the Bloom Cognitive Model (BCM). We evaluate our approach on two public datasets featuring math problems of varying difficulty levels. The experiments demonstrate that our zero-shot prompting strategy significantly outperforms strong baselines. The proposed method can achieve the goal of reliable mathematical mistake identification and provide a foundation for automatic math answer grading. The results underscore the significance of educational theory, serving as domain knowledge, in guiding prompting strategy design for addressing challenging tasks with LLMs effectively.
Read more5/14/2024
💬
0
Logic Contrastive Reasoning with Lightweight Large Language Model for Math Word Problems
Ding Kai, Ma Zhenguo, Yan Xiaoran
This study focuses on improving the performance of lightweight Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning tasks. We introduce a novel method for measuring mathematical logic similarity and design an automatic screening mechanism to construct a set of reference problems that integrate both semantic and logical similarity. By employing carefully crafted positive and negative example prompts, we guide the model towards adopting sound reasoning logic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to utilize retrieval-enhanced generation for mathematical problem-solving. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves a 15.8% improvement over the Chain of Thought approach on the SVAMP dataset and a 21.5 % improvement on the GSM8K dataset. Further application of this method to a large-scale model with 175 billion parameters yields performance comparable to the best results on both aforementioned datasets. Finally, we conduct an analysis of errors during the reasoning process, providing valuable insights and directions for future research on reasoning tasks using large language models.
Read more9/4/2024