Machine Learning with Confidential Computing: A Systematization of Knowledge

Read original: arXiv:2208.10134 - Published 6/4/2024 by Fan Mo, Zahra Tarkhani, Hamed Haddadi

🏷️

Overview

Machine learning (ML) has become increasingly prevalent, but it also brings significant privacy and security challenges.
Confidential Computing is a system-oriented approach that has been used to mitigate these issues in various ML scenarios, both in academia and industry.
This paper investigates the intersection of ML and Confidential Computing, systematizing prior work on Confidential Computing-assisted ML techniques that provide confidentiality guarantees and integrity assurances, and discussing their advanced features and drawbacks.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning (ML) is a powerful technology that is becoming more and more common in our daily lives. However, as ML systems become more widespread, they also present new challenges when it comes to privacy and security.

Confidential Computing is a way of addressing these challenges. It is a system-level approach that has been used in both academic and industry settings to help protect the privacy and security of ML systems.

This paper looks at how Confidential Computing and ML can work together. It organizes and summarizes previous research on Confidential Computing techniques that can provide guarantees of confidentiality and guarantees of integrity for ML systems. The paper also discusses the advanced features and limitations of these techniques.

Technical Explanation

The paper systematizes prior work on Confidential Computing-assisted ML techniques that provide two key capabilities:

Confidentiality guarantees: These techniques ensure that the data and models used in ML systems are kept private and secure, even from the underlying computing infrastructure. This helps address privacy concerns around the use of sensitive data in ML.
Integrity assurances: These techniques ensure that the ML models and computations are protected from tampering or unauthorized modifications. This helps ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of the ML system's outputs.

The paper discusses the advanced features and drawbacks of these Confidential Computing-assisted ML techniques. It also identifies key challenges in this area and provides dedicated analyses of the limitations in existing Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) systems for ML use cases.

Critical Analysis

The paper highlights several limitations and areas for further research in the use of Confidential Computing for ML:

Existing TEE systems may not be well-suited for the specific requirements of ML, such as the need for efficient processing of large datasets and models.
There is a need for more robust privacy definitions and protections in the context of closed-loop ML systems, where the outputs of the ML model can influence the input data.
More dedicated TEE-assisted designs and TEE-aware ML approaches are required to fully unlock the potential of Confidential Computing for ML.
Ensuring end-to-end security and privacy guarantees for the entire ML pipeline, from data ingestion to model deployment, remains a significant challenge.

The paper acknowledges these limitations and suggests potential solutions, such as grounded privacy definitions, partitioned ML executions, and TEE-aware ML designs. However, further research and development are needed to fully address the privacy and security challenges in the intersection of ML and Confidential Computing.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of Confidential Computing-assisted ML techniques, highlighting their potential to mitigate the privacy and security challenges that arise as ML becomes more pervasive. By systematizing prior work and identifying key challenges, the paper lays the groundwork for future research and development in this important area. Addressing the limitations and further enhancing the capabilities of Confidential Computing for ML could lead to significant improvements in the trustworthiness and reliability of ML systems, with far-reaching implications for various industries and applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏷️

Machine Learning with Confidential Computing: A Systematization of Knowledge

Fan Mo, Zahra Tarkhani, Hamed Haddadi

Privacy and security challenges in Machine Learning (ML) have become increasingly severe, along with ML's pervasive development and the recent demonstration of large attack surfaces. As a mature system-oriented approach, Confidential Computing has been utilized in both academia and industry to mitigate privacy and security issues in various ML scenarios. In this paper, the conjunction between ML and Confidential Computing is investigated. We systematize the prior work on Confidential Computing-assisted ML techniques that provide i) confidentiality guarantees and ii) integrity assurances, and discuss their advanced features and drawbacks. Key challenges are further identified, and we provide dedicated analyses of the limitations in existing Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) systems for ML use cases. Finally, prospective works are discussed, including grounded privacy definitions for closed-loop protection, partitioned executions of efficient ML, dedicated TEE-assisted designs for ML, TEE-aware ML, and ML full pipeline guarantees. By providing these potential solutions in our systematization of knowledge, we aim to build the bridge to help achieve a much stronger TEE-enabled ML for privacy guarantees without introducing computation and system costs.

6/4/2024

💬

State-of-the-Art Approaches to Enhancing Privacy Preservation of Machine Learning Datasets: A Survey

Chaoyu Zhang

This paper examines the evolving landscape of machine learning (ML) and its profound impact across various sectors, with a special focus on the emerging field of Privacy-preserving Machine Learning (PPML). As ML applications become increasingly integral to industries like telecommunications, financial technology, and surveillance, they raise significant privacy concerns, necessitating the development of PPML strategies. The paper highlights the unique challenges in safeguarding privacy within ML frameworks, which stem from the diverse capabilities of potential adversaries, including their ability to infer sensitive information from model outputs or training data. We delve into the spectrum of threat models that characterize adversarial intentions, ranging from membership and attribute inference to data reconstruction. The paper emphasizes the importance of maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of training data, outlining current research efforts that focus on refining training data to minimize privacy-sensitive information and enhancing data processing techniques to uphold privacy. Through a comprehensive analysis of privacy leakage risks and countermeasures in both centralized and collaborative learning settings, this paper aims to provide a thorough understanding of effective strategies for protecting ML training data against privacy intrusions. It explores the balance between data privacy and model utility, shedding light on privacy-preserving techniques that leverage cryptographic methods, Differential Privacy, and Trusted Execution Environments. The discussion extends to the application of these techniques in sensitive domains, underscoring the critical role of PPML in ensuring the privacy and security of ML systems.

4/29/2024

Confidential Federated Computations

Hubert Eichner, Daniel Ramage, Kallista Bonawitz, Dzmitry Huba, Tiziano Santoro, Brett McLarnon, Timon Van Overveldt, Nova Fallen, Peter Kairouz, Albert Cheu, Katharine Daly, Adria Gascon, Marco Gruteser, Brendan McMahan

Federated Learning and Analytics (FLA) have seen widespread adoption by technology platforms for processing sensitive on-device data. However, basic FLA systems have privacy limitations: they do not necessarily require anonymization mechanisms like differential privacy (DP), and provide limited protections against a potentially malicious service provider. Adding DP to a basic FLA system currently requires either adding excessive noise to each device's updates, or assuming an honest service provider that correctly implements the mechanism and only uses the privatized outputs. Secure multiparty computation (SMPC) -based oblivious aggregations can limit the service provider's access to individual user updates and improve DP tradeoffs, but the tradeoffs are still suboptimal, and they suffer from scalability challenges and susceptibility to Sybil attacks. This paper introduces a novel system architecture that leverages trusted execution environments (TEEs) and open-sourcing to both ensure confidentiality of server-side computations and provide externally verifiable privacy properties, bolstering the robustness and trustworthiness of private federated computations.

4/17/2024

🤔

Privacy Side Channels in Machine Learning Systems

Edoardo Debenedetti, Giorgio Severi, Nicholas Carlini, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Matthew Jagielski, Milad Nasr, Eric Wallace, Florian Tram`er

Most current approaches for protecting privacy in machine learning (ML) assume that models exist in a vacuum. Yet, in reality, these models are part of larger systems that include components for training data filtering, output monitoring, and more. In this work, we introduce privacy side channels: attacks that exploit these system-level components to extract private information at far higher rates than is otherwise possible for standalone models. We propose four categories of side channels that span the entire ML lifecycle (training data filtering, input preprocessing, output post-processing, and query filtering) and allow for enhanced membership inference, data extraction, and even novel threats such as extraction of users' test queries. For example, we show that deduplicating training data before applying differentially-private training creates a side-channel that completely invalidates any provable privacy guarantees. We further show that systems which block language models from regenerating training data can be exploited to exfiltrate private keys contained in the training set--even if the model did not memorize these keys. Taken together, our results demonstrate the need for a holistic, end-to-end privacy analysis of machine learning systems.

7/19/2024