Machine Learning with Physics Knowledge for Prediction: A Survey

Read original: arXiv:2408.09840 - Published 8/20/2024 by Joe Watson, Chen Song, Oliver Weeger, Theo Gruner, An T. Le, Kay Hansel, Ahmed Hendawy, Oleg Arenz, Will Trojak, Miles Cranmer and 5 others
Total Score

0

Machine Learning with Physics Knowledge for Prediction: A Survey

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the use of physics knowledge in machine learning for prediction tasks.
  • It covers various techniques and approaches that leverage physics principles to enhance the performance and interpretability of machine learning models.
  • The survey examines how physics knowledge can be incorporated into different stages of the machine learning pipeline, including data preprocessing, model design, and optimization.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how machine learning models can be improved by incorporating knowledge from the physical sciences. Machine learning is a powerful tool for making predictions, but it often relies on large datasets without much understanding of the underlying physical processes. By blending machine learning with physics-informed approaches, researchers can create more accurate and interpretable models.

Some key techniques discussed in the paper include:

  • Using physics equations or principles to preprocess data and remove irrelevant or redundant information
  • Designing machine learning architectures that are tailored to capture known physical behaviors
  • Incorporating physics-based constraints or regularizers into the model optimization process to ensure consistency with physical laws

The goal is to leverage the complementary strengths of machine learning and physics to produce better predictive models that are both accurate and aligned with our scientific understanding of the world.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging field of physics-informed machine learning. It explores how physical knowledge can be incorporated into various stages of the machine learning pipeline to enhance the performance, robustness, and interpretability of predictive models.

One key approach discussed is the use of physics-based preprocessing techniques. By leveraging principles from the physical sciences, researchers can transform raw data in ways that remove irrelevant or redundant information, leading to more efficient and effective machine learning models. For example, applying dimensional analysis or conservation laws can help identify the most important variables and reduce the dimensionality of the input space.

The paper also examines how machine learning architectures can be designed to explicitly capture known physical behaviors. This includes incorporating physical constraints, such as conservation laws or symmetry principles, directly into the model structure. By aligning the model architecture with the underlying physics, researchers can improve the model's ability to generalize and extrapolate beyond the training data.

Another important aspect covered is the integration of physics-based regularizers or losses into the model optimization process. These regularizers encourage the machine learning model to satisfy certain physical constraints or to match the outputs of physics-based simulations. This can help ensure that the learned model is consistent with our scientific understanding of the problem domain.

Critical Analysis

The survey provides a thorough and systematic review of the various approaches for incorporating physics knowledge into machine learning, highlighting both the benefits and the challenges. One limitation noted is the potential tradeoff between model complexity and interpretability. While physics-informed models may be more accurate and robust, the added complexity can make it harder to understand the inner workings of the model and the reasoning behind its predictions.

Another area for further research discussed in the paper is the development of more automated and scalable techniques for extracting and incorporating relevant physics knowledge. Currently, much of the work in this field relies on manual feature engineering and model design, which can be time-consuming and domain-specific. Advances in areas like physics-aware machine learning and physics-enhanced machine learning could help to streamline the process and make these techniques more accessible to a broader range of applications.

Conclusion

In summary, this comprehensive survey highlights the significant potential of leveraging physics knowledge to enhance the performance and interpretability of machine learning models. By integrating physical principles into various stages of the machine learning pipeline, researchers can create predictive models that are more accurate, robust, and aligned with our scientific understanding of the world. As the field of physics-informed machine learning continues to evolve, these techniques are poised to have a transformative impact on a wide range of applications, from scientific discovery to real-world decision-making.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Machine Learning with Physics Knowledge for Prediction: A Survey
Total Score

0

Machine Learning with Physics Knowledge for Prediction: A Survey

Joe Watson, Chen Song, Oliver Weeger, Theo Gruner, An T. Le, Kay Hansel, Ahmed Hendawy, Oleg Arenz, Will Trojak, Miles Cranmer, Carlo D'Eramo, Fabian Bulow, Tanmay Goyal, Jan Peters, Martin W. Hoffman

This survey examines the broad suite of methods and models for combining machine learning with physics knowledge for prediction and forecast, with a focus on partial differential equations. These methods have attracted significant interest due to their potential impact on advancing scientific research and industrial practices by improving predictive models with small- or large-scale datasets and expressive predictive models with useful inductive biases. The survey has two parts. The first considers incorporating physics knowledge on an architectural level through objective functions, structured predictive models, and data augmentation. The second considers data as physics knowledge, which motivates looking at multi-task, meta, and contextual learning as an alternative approach to incorporating physics knowledge in a data-driven fashion. Finally, we also provide an industrial perspective on the application of these methods and a survey of the open-source ecosystem for physics-informed machine learning.

Read more

8/20/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Smart Additive Manufacturing

Rahul Sharma, Maziar Raissi, Y. B. Guo

Compared to physics-based computational manufacturing, data-driven models such as machine learning (ML) are alternative approaches to achieve smart manufacturing. However, the data-driven ML's black box nature has presented a challenge to interpreting its outcomes. On the other hand, governing physical laws are not effectively utilized to develop data-efficient ML algorithms. To leverage the advantages of ML and physical laws of advanced manufacturing, this paper focuses on the development of a physics-informed machine learning (PIML) model by integrating neural networks and physical laws to improve model accuracy, transparency, and generalization with case studies in laser metal deposition (LMD).

Read more

7/16/2024

Physics-informed machine learning as a kernel method
Total Score

0

Physics-informed machine learning as a kernel method

Nathan Doum`eche (LPSM), Francis Bach (DI-ENS, SIERRA), G'erard Biau (LPSM), Claire Boyer (IUF, LPSM)

Physics-informed machine learning combines the expressiveness of data-based approaches with the interpretability of physical models. In this context, we consider a general regression problem where the empirical risk is regularized by a partial differential equation that quantifies the physical inconsistency. We prove that for linear differential priors, the problem can be formulated as a kernel regression task. Taking advantage of kernel theory, we derive convergence rates for the minimizer of the regularized risk and show that it converges at least at the Sobolev minimax rate. However, faster rates can be achieved, depending on the physical error. This principle is illustrated with a one-dimensional example, supporting the claim that regularizing the empirical risk with physical information can be beneficial to the statistical performance of estimators.

Read more

6/21/2024

Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning: a position paper for dynamical systems investigations
Total Score

0

Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning: a position paper for dynamical systems investigations

Alice Cicirello

This position paper takes a broad look at Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning (PEML) -- also known as Scientific Machine Learning -- with particular focus to those PEML strategies developed to tackle dynamical systems' challenges. The need to go beyond Machine Learning (ML) strategies is driven by: (i) limited volume of informative data, (ii) avoiding accurate-but-wrong predictions; (iii) dealing with uncertainties; (iv) providing Explainable and Interpretable inferences. A general definition of PEML is provided by considering four physics and domain knowledge biases, and three broad groups of PEML approaches are discussed: physics-guided, physics-encoded and physics-informed. The advantages and challenges in developing PEML strategies for guiding high-consequence decision making in engineering applications involving complex dynamical systems, are presented.

Read more

6/11/2024