Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrology

Read original: arXiv:2310.05227 - Published 7/15/2024 by Qingsong Xu, Yilei Shi, Jonathan Bamber, Ye Tuo, Ralf Ludwig, Xiao Xiang Zhu
Total Score

0

Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrology

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new approach to machine learning that integrates physical principles, known as "physics-aware machine learning."
  • The authors argue that this approach can revolutionize scientific paradigms for machine learning and process-based hydrology.
  • Key elements include incorporating physical constraints and domain knowledge into machine learning models, enabling more accurate and interpretable predictions.

Plain English Explanation

This paper introduces a new way of doing machine learning that combines physical science principles with the power of machine learning algorithms. The authors believe this "physics-aware machine learning" approach can transform how we use machine learning in scientific fields, particularly in the study of water systems (hydrology).

Traditionally, machine learning models have been developed without much consideration for the underlying physical laws and processes governing the systems being studied. This paper suggests incorporating this physical knowledge directly into the machine learning models. By doing so, the models can make more accurate and interpretable predictions, since they are grounded in our scientific understanding of the world.

For example, in hydrology, machine learning models could be designed to respect the laws of conservation of mass and energy when making predictions about water flow and storage. This hybrid approach of combining physical principles and machine learning algorithms is expected to lead to major advances in our ability to understand and predict complex environmental and physical systems.

Technical Explanation

The core idea of "physics-aware machine learning" is to incorporate physical constraints and domain knowledge directly into the machine learning models, rather than treating them as black boxes. This is accomplished through various techniques, such as:

  1. Encoding physical principles as regularization terms in the loss function
  2. Designing neural network architectures that reflect the underlying physical structure of the problem
  3. Leveraging physical simulation models to generate training data that respects conservation laws

By tightly integrating the physical and data-driven components, the authors argue that this approach can lead to more accurate, robust, and interpretable machine learning models. The enhanced interpretability also enables these models to provide insights into the physical processes governing the system.

Critical Analysis

The authors make a compelling case for the benefits of physics-aware machine learning, particularly in domains like hydrology where physical processes play a critical role. However, the implementation of this approach may not be straightforward, as it requires deep knowledge of both the physical system and machine learning techniques.

Additionally, the authors acknowledge that incorporating physical constraints may limit the flexibility of the machine learning models, potentially reducing their ability to capture complex, non-linear relationships in the data. Further research is needed to strike the right balance between physical realism and model expressivity.

Another potential challenge is the availability and quality of the physical data required to train these models. Inaccuracies or gaps in the physical knowledge could introduce biases and reduce the overall performance of the system.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising new direction for machine learning that aims to revolutionize how we approach scientific problems. By tightly integrating physical principles and domain knowledge into the machine learning models, the authors believe we can develop more accurate, robust, and interpretable predictions that can lead to transformative insights in fields like hydrology and beyond.

While the implementation may pose some challenges, the potential benefits of this physics-aware machine learning approach are significant and warrant further exploration and development. As the field of machine learning continues to evolve, this type of hybrid approach that respects the underlying physical laws of the world may become increasingly important for advancing our scientific understanding and tackling complex real-world problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrology
Total Score

0

Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrology

Qingsong Xu, Yilei Shi, Jonathan Bamber, Ye Tuo, Ralf Ludwig, Xiao Xiang Zhu

Accurate hydrological understanding and water cycle prediction are crucial for addressing scientific and societal challenges associated with the management of water resources, particularly under the dynamic influence of anthropogenic climate change. Existing reviews predominantly concentrate on the development of machine learning (ML) in this field, yet there is a clear distinction between hydrology and ML as separate paradigms. Here, we introduce physics-aware ML as a transformative approach to overcome the perceived barrier and revolutionize both fields. Specifically, we present a comprehensive review of the physics-aware ML methods, building a structured community (PaML) of existing methodologies that integrate prior physical knowledge or physics-based modeling into ML. We systematically analyze these PaML methodologies with respect to four aspects: physical data-guided ML, physics-informed ML, physics-embedded ML, and physics-aware hybrid learning. PaML facilitates ML-aided hypotheses, accelerating insights from big data and fostering scientific discoveries. We first conduct a systematic review of hydrology in PaML, including rainfall-runoff hydrological processes and hydrodynamic processes, and highlight the most promising and challenging directions for different objectives and PaML methods. Finally, a new PaML-based hydrology platform, termed HydroPML, is released as a foundation for hydrological applications. HydroPML enhances the explainability and causality of ML and lays the groundwork for the digital water cycle's realization. The HydroPML platform is publicly available at https://hydropml.github.io/.

Read more

7/15/2024

Machine Learning with Physics Knowledge for Prediction: A Survey
Total Score

0

Machine Learning with Physics Knowledge for Prediction: A Survey

Joe Watson, Chen Song, Oliver Weeger, Theo Gruner, An T. Le, Kay Hansel, Ahmed Hendawy, Oleg Arenz, Will Trojak, Miles Cranmer, Carlo D'Eramo, Fabian Bulow, Tanmay Goyal, Jan Peters, Martin W. Hoffman

This survey examines the broad suite of methods and models for combining machine learning with physics knowledge for prediction and forecast, with a focus on partial differential equations. These methods have attracted significant interest due to their potential impact on advancing scientific research and industrial practices by improving predictive models with small- or large-scale datasets and expressive predictive models with useful inductive biases. The survey has two parts. The first considers incorporating physics knowledge on an architectural level through objective functions, structured predictive models, and data augmentation. The second considers data as physics knowledge, which motivates looking at multi-task, meta, and contextual learning as an alternative approach to incorporating physics knowledge in a data-driven fashion. Finally, we also provide an industrial perspective on the application of these methods and a survey of the open-source ecosystem for physics-informed machine learning.

Read more

8/20/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Physics-Informed Machine Learning On Polar Ice: A Survey

Zesheng Liu, YoungHyun Koo, Maryam Rahnemoonfar

The mass loss of the polar ice sheets contributes considerably to ongoing sea-level rise and changing ocean circulation, leading to coastal flooding and risking the homes and livelihoods of tens of millions of people globally. To address the complex problem of ice behavior, physical models and data-driven models have been proposed in the literature. Although traditional physical models can guarantee physically meaningful results, they have limitations in producing high-resolution results. On the other hand, data-driven approaches require large amounts of high-quality and labeled data, which is rarely available in the polar regions. Hence, as a promising framework that leverages the advantages of physical models and data-driven methods, physics-informed machine learning (PIML) has been widely studied in recent years. In this paper, we review the existing algorithms of PIML, provide our own taxonomy based on the methods of combining physics and data-driven approaches, and analyze the advantages of PIML in the aspects of accuracy and efficiency. Further, our survey discusses some current challenges and highlights future opportunities, including PIML on sea ice studies, PIML with different combination methods and backbone networks, and neural operator methods.

Read more

5/1/2024

Machine learning surrogates for efficient hydrologic modeling: Insights from stochastic simulations of managed aquifer recharge
Total Score

0

Machine learning surrogates for efficient hydrologic modeling: Insights from stochastic simulations of managed aquifer recharge

Timothy Dai, Kate Maher, Zach Perzan

Process-based hydrologic models are invaluable tools for understanding the terrestrial water cycle and addressing modern water resources problems. However, many hydrologic models are computationally expensive and, depending on the resolution and scale, simulations can take on the order of hours to days to complete. While techniques such as uncertainty quantification and optimization have become valuable tools for supporting management decisions, these analyses typically require hundreds of model simulations, which are too computationally expensive to perform with a process-based hydrologic model. To address this gap, we propose a hybrid modeling workflow in which a process-based model is used to generate an initial set of simulations and a machine learning (ML) surrogate model is then trained to perform the remaining simulations required for downstream analysis. As a case study, we apply this workflow to simulations of variably saturated groundwater flow at a prospective managed aquifer recharge (MAR) site. We compare the accuracy and computational efficiency of several ML architectures, including deep convolutional networks, recurrent neural networks, vision transformers, and networks with Fourier transforms. Our results demonstrate that ML surrogate models can achieve under 10% mean absolute percentage error and yield order-of-magnitude runtime savings over processed-based models. We also offer practical recommendations for training hydrologic surrogate models, including implementing data normalization to improve accuracy, using a normalized loss function to improve training stability and downsampling input features to decrease memory requirements.

Read more

7/31/2024