Machine Unlearning for Document Classification
2404.19031
0
0
Abstract
Document understanding models have recently demonstrated remarkable performance by leveraging extensive collections of user documents. However, since documents often contain large amounts of personal data, their usage can pose a threat to user privacy and weaken the bonds of trust between humans and AI services. In response to these concerns, legislation advocating ``the right to be forgotten has recently been proposed, allowing users to request the removal of private information from computer systems and neural network models. A novel approach, known as machine unlearning, has emerged to make AI models forget about a particular class of data. In our research, we explore machine unlearning for document classification problems, representing, to the best of our knowledge, the first investigation into this area. Specifically, we consider a realistic scenario where a remote server houses a well-trained model and possesses only a small portion of training data. This setup is designed for efficient forgetting manipulation. This work represents a pioneering step towards the development of machine unlearning methods aimed at addressing privacy concerns in document analysis applications. Our code is publicly available at url{https://github.com/leitro/MachineUnlearning-DocClassification}.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel technique called "machine unlearning" for document classification tasks, which aims to remove the influence of specific data samples from a trained model.
- The proposed approach, called "selective machine unlearning", allows users to specify which data samples should be forgotten by the model, enabling greater control over the model's knowledge and potential privacy concerns.
- The researchers develop a theoretical framework for machine unlearning and validate their method on several document classification datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in selectively removing the influence of specific data samples.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to "undo" what a machine learning model has learned, specifically for tasks like classifying documents. The key idea is that sometimes you might want to remove the influence of certain data samples from the model - for example, if those samples contain sensitive or private information.
The researchers call this "machine unlearning", and they develop a technique that allows users to specify which data samples the model should "forget". This gives people more control over what the model knows and helps address privacy concerns.
The paper lays out the theory behind this approach and shows that it works well in practice on document classification tasks. The method is able to selectively remove the influence of specific data samples, without significantly impacting the model's overall performance on the task.
This work is important because as machine learning models become more powerful and widespread, there is a growing need to give people more control over their data and the knowledge encoded in these models. The "machine unlearning" technique presented here is a step in that direction, allowing for more privacy-preserving and accountable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a technique called "selective machine unlearning" for document classification tasks. The key idea is to develop a framework that allows users to specify which data samples should be "forgotten" by the trained model, in order to remove their influence.
The researchers first develop a theoretical foundation for machine unlearning, defining the problem and establishing desirable properties such as "selective unlearning" and "unlearning fidelity". They then present an optimization-based solution that can selectively remove the influence of specific data samples from the model's parameters.
The method works by calibrating the model's null space - the directions in parameter space that do not affect the model's outputs. By modifying the null space, the researchers are able to remove the influence of target data samples without significantly impacting the model's performance on the overall task.
The proposed approach is evaluated on several document classification datasets, including 20 Newsgroups, Reuters, and IMDB. The results show that the selective machine unlearning technique can effectively remove the influence of specified data samples, while maintaining high classification accuracy. Additionally, the method is shown to be computationally efficient and scalable to large models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation of the machine unlearning problem, with a strong theoretical foundation and compelling experimental results. The selective unlearning approach seems to be a promising technique for addressing data privacy concerns in machine learning.
However, the paper does not discuss some potential limitations or caveats of the method. For example, it is unclear how the approach would scale to extremely large language models or to more complex machine learning tasks beyond document classification. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for adversarial manipulation of the unlearning process.
Further research could explore the robustness of the selective unlearning technique in the face of adversarial attacks, as well as its applicability to a wider range of machine learning problems and model architectures. Exploring the societal implications and ethical considerations of machine unlearning could also be a fruitful area for future work.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the emerging field of machine unlearning and data privacy in AI systems. The selective unlearning approach represents a significant step forward in giving users more control over the knowledge encoded in machine learning models.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel technique called "selective machine unlearning" that allows users to specify which data samples should be forgotten by a trained document classification model. The researchers develop a strong theoretical framework for machine unlearning and demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark datasets.
The ability to selectively remove the influence of specific data samples is an important capability, as it enables greater control over the knowledge encoded in machine learning models and helps address growing concerns around data privacy and accountability. While the paper does not address all potential limitations, the selective unlearning technique represents a significant advancement in the field of machine unlearning.
As machine learning systems become more pervasive, methods like the one proposed in this paper will be crucial for building AI systems that are transparent, controllable, and respectful of individual privacy. This work lays important groundwork for the development of more ethical and responsible AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⛏️
Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey
Weiqi Wang, Zhiyi Tian, Shui Yu
0
0
As the right to be forgotten has been legislated worldwide, many studies attempt to design unlearning mechanisms to protect users' privacy when they want to leave machine learning service platforms. Specifically, machine unlearning is to make a trained model to remove the contribution of an erased subset of the training dataset. This survey aims to systematically classify a wide range of machine unlearning and discuss their differences, connections and open problems. We categorize current unlearning methods into four scenarios: centralized unlearning, distributed and irregular data unlearning, unlearning verification, and privacy and security issues in unlearning. Since centralized unlearning is the primary domain, we use two parts to introduce: firstly, we classify centralized unlearning into exact unlearning and approximate unlearning; secondly, we offer a detailed introduction to the techniques of these methods. Besides the centralized unlearning, we notice some studies about distributed and irregular data unlearning and introduce federated unlearning and graph unlearning as the two representative directions. After introducing unlearning methods, we review studies about unlearning verification. Moreover, we consider the privacy and security issues essential in machine unlearning and organize the latest related literature. Finally, we discuss the challenges of various unlearning scenarios and address the potential research directions.
5/14/2024
Gone but Not Forgotten: Improved Benchmarks for Machine Unlearning
Keltin Grimes, Collin Abidi, Cole Frank, Shannon Gallagher
0
0
Machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, including attacks that leak information about the model's training data. There has recently been an increase in interest about how to best address privacy concerns, especially in the presence of data-removal requests. Machine unlearning algorithms aim to efficiently update trained models to comply with data deletion requests while maintaining performance and without having to resort to retraining the model from scratch, a costly endeavor. Several algorithms in the machine unlearning literature demonstrate some level of privacy gains, but they are often evaluated only on rudimentary membership inference attacks, which do not represent realistic threats. In this paper we describe and propose alternative evaluation methods for three key shortcomings in the current evaluation of unlearning algorithms. We show the utility of our alternative evaluations via a series of experiments of state-of-the-art unlearning algorithms on different computer vision datasets, presenting a more detailed picture of the state of the field.
5/30/2024
🌿
An Information Theoretic Approach to Machine Unlearning
Jack Foster, Kyle Fogarty, Stefan Schoepf, Cengiz Oztireli, Alexandra Brintrup
0
0
To comply with AI and data regulations, the need to forget private or copyrighted information from trained machine learning models is increasingly important. The key challenge in unlearning is forgetting the necessary data in a timely manner, while preserving model performance. In this work, we address the zero-shot unlearning scenario, whereby an unlearning algorithm must be able to remove data given only a trained model and the data to be forgotten. We explore unlearning from an information theoretic perspective, connecting the influence of a sample to the information gain a model receives by observing it. From this, we derive a simple but principled zero-shot unlearning method based on the geometry of the model. Our approach takes the form of minimising the gradient of a learned function with respect to a small neighbourhood around a target forget point. This induces a smoothing effect, causing forgetting by moving the boundary of the classifier. We explore the intuition behind why this approach can jointly unlearn forget samples while preserving general model performance through a series of low-dimensional experiments. We perform extensive empirical evaluation of our method over a range of contemporary benchmarks, verifying that our method is competitive with state-of-the-art performance under the strict constraints of zero-shot unlearning.
6/6/2024
Machine Unlearning of Pre-trained Large Language Models
Jin Yao, Eli Chien, Minxin Du, Xinyao Niu, Tianhao Wang, Zezhou Cheng, Xiang Yue
0
0
This study investigates the concept of the `right to be forgotten' within the context of large language models (LLMs). We explore machine unlearning as a pivotal solution, with a focus on pre-trained models--a notably under-researched area. Our research delineates a comprehensive framework for machine unlearning in pre-trained LLMs, encompassing a critical analysis of seven diverse unlearning methods. Through rigorous evaluation using curated datasets from arXiv, books, and GitHub, we establish a robust benchmark for unlearning performance, demonstrating that these methods are over $10^5$ times more computationally efficient than retraining. Our results show that integrating gradient ascent with gradient descent on in-distribution data improves hyperparameter robustness. We also provide detailed guidelines for efficient hyperparameter tuning in the unlearning process. Our findings advance the discourse on ethical AI practices, offering substantive insights into the mechanics of machine unlearning for pre-trained LLMs and underscoring the potential for responsible AI development.
5/31/2024