Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey
2405.07406
0
0
⛏️
Abstract
As the right to be forgotten has been legislated worldwide, many studies attempt to design unlearning mechanisms to protect users' privacy when they want to leave machine learning service platforms. Specifically, machine unlearning is to make a trained model to remove the contribution of an erased subset of the training dataset. This survey aims to systematically classify a wide range of machine unlearning and discuss their differences, connections and open problems. We categorize current unlearning methods into four scenarios: centralized unlearning, distributed and irregular data unlearning, unlearning verification, and privacy and security issues in unlearning. Since centralized unlearning is the primary domain, we use two parts to introduce: firstly, we classify centralized unlearning into exact unlearning and approximate unlearning; secondly, we offer a detailed introduction to the techniques of these methods. Besides the centralized unlearning, we notice some studies about distributed and irregular data unlearning and introduce federated unlearning and graph unlearning as the two representative directions. After introducing unlearning methods, we review studies about unlearning verification. Moreover, we consider the privacy and security issues essential in machine unlearning and organize the latest related literature. Finally, we discuss the challenges of various unlearning scenarios and address the potential research directions.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper surveys a wide range of "machine unlearning" techniques, which aim to remove the influence of specific data from trained machine learning models.
- As the "right to be forgotten" has become legislated in many regions, these unlearning methods are important for protecting user privacy on machine learning platforms.
- The paper categorizes unlearning approaches into four main scenarios: centralized unlearning, distributed/irregular data unlearning, unlearning verification, and privacy/security issues.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are trained on large datasets, which can include sensitive user information. As privacy regulations evolve to give users more control over their data, there is a growing need for "unlearning" techniques that can remove the influence of specific data from these trained models.
This survey paper provides an overview of the different types of machine unlearning methods that researchers have developed. At a high level, the key ideas are:
-
Centralized Unlearning: Techniques for removing the impact of particular data points from a model that was trained in a central location. This can be done either exactly (completely removing the data) or approximately (reducing the data's influence).
-
Distributed/Irregular Unlearning: Addressing unlearning in scenarios where the training data is spread across multiple locations (e.g. federated learning) or has an irregular structure (e.g. graph-structured data).
-
Unlearning Verification: Assessing whether an unlearning method has successfully removed the target data's influence from the model.
-
Privacy/Security Considerations: Ensuring that the unlearning process itself doesn't compromise privacy or open up new security vulnerabilities.
The paper systematically reviews the latest research advances in each of these areas, providing a comprehensive summary of the current state-of-the-art in machine unlearning. By understanding these techniques, machine learning practitioners can build more privacy-preserving systems that give users more control over their data.
Technical Explanation
The paper first categorizes machine unlearning approaches into four main scenarios:
- Centralized Unlearning: Techniques for removing the impact of particular data points from a model trained in a central location. This can be further divided into:
- Exact Unlearning: Completely removing the contribution of the target data from the trained model.
- Approximate Unlearning: Reducing the influence of the target data rather than eliminating it entirely.
- Distributed and Irregular Data Unlearning: Addressing unlearning in scenarios where the training data is spread across multiple locations (e.g. federated learning) or has an irregular structure (e.g. graph-structured data).
- Unlearning Verification: Techniques for assessing whether an unlearning method has successfully removed the target data's influence from the model.
- Privacy and Security Issues in Unlearning: Ensuring that the unlearning process itself doesn't compromise privacy or open up new security vulnerabilities.
The paper then provides a detailed technical overview of the various centralized unlearning methods, including gradient-based approaches, influence function-based methods, and techniques that leverage dataset condensation (dataset condensation-driven machine unlearning). It also covers the emerging research on distributed/irregular data unlearning and unlearning verification.
Finally, the paper discusses the critical privacy and security considerations in machine unlearning, such as the potential for model inversion attacks and the need for secure deletion protocols. It highlights the importance of developing unlearning methods that are both effective and privacy-preserving.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive survey of the current state-of-the-art in machine unlearning, covering a wide range of techniques and scenarios. However, it also acknowledges several open challenges and areas for future research:
-
Scalability: Many of the exact unlearning methods can be computationally expensive, particularly for large-scale models. More efficient approximate unlearning techniques are needed to make unlearning practical for real-world applications.
-
Generalization: The paper notes that most unlearning research has focused on specific model architectures or data types. Developing unlearning methods that can generalize across a wider range of machine learning systems is an important area for further exploration.
-
Unlearning Verification: While the paper reviews some initial work on unlearning verification, this is still a relatively nascent field. More robust and standardized evaluation procedures are needed to ensure the effectiveness of unlearning approaches.
-
Privacy and Security: The privacy and security implications of unlearning are still not fully understood. Additional research is required to anticipate and mitigate potential vulnerabilities introduced by unlearning mechanisms.
Overall, this survey provides a valuable reference point for the current state of machine unlearning research. By highlighting the key challenges and open problems, it helps to inform future work in this important and rapidly evolving field of study.
Conclusion
As machine learning systems become more ubiquitous and influential in our lives, the need for effective "unlearning" mechanisms has become increasingly important. This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of the various techniques and scenarios that researchers have explored in the domain of machine unlearning.
By categorizing the different unlearning approaches and delving into their technical details, the paper offers a clear roadmap for understanding the current state-of-the-art. Importantly, it also identifies several critical areas for future research, such as improving the scalability and generalization of unlearning methods, as well as addressing the privacy and security implications.
Overall, this survey serves as a valuable resource for machine learning practitioners, researchers, and policymakers alike, as they navigate the evolving landscape of privacy regulations and user data rights. By advancing the field of machine unlearning, we can build more transparent and user-centric machine learning systems that empower individuals to have greater control over their personal information.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Machine Unlearning for Document Classification
Lei Kang, Mohamed Ali Souibgui, Fei Yang, Lluis Gomez, Ernest Valveny, Dimosthenis Karatzas
0
0
Document understanding models have recently demonstrated remarkable performance by leveraging extensive collections of user documents. However, since documents often contain large amounts of personal data, their usage can pose a threat to user privacy and weaken the bonds of trust between humans and AI services. In response to these concerns, legislation advocating ``the right to be forgotten has recently been proposed, allowing users to request the removal of private information from computer systems and neural network models. A novel approach, known as machine unlearning, has emerged to make AI models forget about a particular class of data. In our research, we explore machine unlearning for document classification problems, representing, to the best of our knowledge, the first investigation into this area. Specifically, we consider a realistic scenario where a remote server houses a well-trained model and possesses only a small portion of training data. This setup is designed for efficient forgetting manipulation. This work represents a pioneering step towards the development of machine unlearning methods aimed at addressing privacy concerns in document analysis applications. Our code is publicly available at url{https://github.com/leitro/MachineUnlearning-DocClassification}.
5/1/2024
Gone but Not Forgotten: Improved Benchmarks for Machine Unlearning
Keltin Grimes, Collin Abidi, Cole Frank, Shannon Gallagher
0
0
Machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, including attacks that leak information about the model's training data. There has recently been an increase in interest about how to best address privacy concerns, especially in the presence of data-removal requests. Machine unlearning algorithms aim to efficiently update trained models to comply with data deletion requests while maintaining performance and without having to resort to retraining the model from scratch, a costly endeavor. Several algorithms in the machine unlearning literature demonstrate some level of privacy gains, but they are often evaluated only on rudimentary membership inference attacks, which do not represent realistic threats. In this paper we describe and propose alternative evaluation methods for three key shortcomings in the current evaluation of unlearning algorithms. We show the utility of our alternative evaluations via a series of experiments of state-of-the-art unlearning algorithms on different computer vision datasets, presenting a more detailed picture of the state of the field.
5/30/2024
Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models
Sijia Liu, Yuanshun Yao, Jinghan Jia, Stephen Casper, Nathalie Baracaldo, Peter Hase, Xiaojun Xu, Yuguang Yao, Hang Li, Kush R. Varshney, Mohit Bansal, Sanmi Koyejo, Yang Liu
0
0
We explore machine unlearning (MU) in the domain of large language models (LLMs), referred to as LLM unlearning. This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities, while maintaining the integrity of essential knowledge generation and not affecting causally unrelated information. We envision LLM unlearning becoming a pivotal element in the life-cycle management of LLMs, potentially standing as an essential foundation for developing generative AI that is not only safe, secure, and trustworthy, but also resource-efficient without the need of full retraining. We navigate the unlearning landscape in LLMs from conceptual formulation, methodologies, metrics, and applications. In particular, we highlight the often-overlooked aspects of existing LLM unlearning research, e.g., unlearning scope, data-model interaction, and multifaceted efficacy assessment. We also draw connections between LLM unlearning and related areas such as model editing, influence functions, model explanation, adversarial training, and reinforcement learning. Furthermore, we outline an effective assessment framework for LLM unlearning and explore its applications in copyright and privacy safeguards and sociotechnical harm reduction.
4/8/2024
What makes unlearning hard and what to do about it
Kairan Zhao, Meghdad Kurmanji, George-Octavian Bu{a}rbulescu, Eleni Triantafillou, Peter Triantafillou
0
0
Machine unlearning is the problem of removing the effect of a subset of training data (the ''forget set'') from a trained model without damaging the model's utility e.g. to comply with users' requests to delete their data, or remove mislabeled, poisoned or otherwise problematic data. With unlearning research still being at its infancy, many fundamental open questions exist: Are there interpretable characteristics of forget sets that substantially affect the difficulty of the problem? How do these characteristics affect different state-of-the-art algorithms? With this paper, we present the first investigation aiming to answer these questions. We identify two key factors affecting unlearning difficulty and the performance of unlearning algorithms. Evaluation on forget sets that isolate these identified factors reveals previously-unknown behaviours of state-of-the-art algorithms that don't materialize on random forget sets. Based on our insights, we develop a framework coined Refined-Unlearning Meta-algorithm (RUM) that encompasses: (i) refining the forget set into homogenized subsets, according to different characteristics; and (ii) a meta-algorithm that employs existing algorithms to unlearn each subset and finally delivers a model that has unlearned the overall forget set. We find that RUM substantially improves top-performing unlearning algorithms. Overall, we view our work as an important step in (i) deepening our scientific understanding of unlearning and (ii) revealing new pathways to improving the state-of-the-art.
6/4/2024