Gone but Not Forgotten: Improved Benchmarks for Machine Unlearning
2405.19211
0
0
Abstract
Machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, including attacks that leak information about the model's training data. There has recently been an increase in interest about how to best address privacy concerns, especially in the presence of data-removal requests. Machine unlearning algorithms aim to efficiently update trained models to comply with data deletion requests while maintaining performance and without having to resort to retraining the model from scratch, a costly endeavor. Several algorithms in the machine unlearning literature demonstrate some level of privacy gains, but they are often evaluated only on rudimentary membership inference attacks, which do not represent realistic threats. In this paper we describe and propose alternative evaluation methods for three key shortcomings in the current evaluation of unlearning algorithms. We show the utility of our alternative evaluations via a series of experiments of state-of-the-art unlearning algorithms on different computer vision datasets, presenting a more detailed picture of the state of the field.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes improved benchmarks for evaluating machine unlearning, a technique that allows machine learning models to forget specific training data.
- The authors highlight limitations in existing unlearning benchmarks and introduce new datasets and metrics to better assess the effectiveness and efficiency of unlearning methods.
- The paper covers key concepts in machine unlearning, such as the "unlearning definition and notation," and provides a technical explanation of their proposed benchmarks.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are often trained on large datasets, which can contain sensitive or private information. Machine unlearning is a technique that allows these models to "forget" specific pieces of training data, protecting user privacy. However, evaluating the effectiveness of machine unlearning can be challenging.
This paper tackles this problem by proposing new benchmarks for testing machine unlearning. The authors identify issues with existing benchmarks and introduce new datasets and metrics that better capture the performance of unlearning methods. For example, they create datasets that closely mimic real-world scenarios where users may want to remove their data from a model.
By using these improved benchmarks, researchers and developers can more accurately evaluate how well machine learning models can effectively "unlearn" specific training data. This is an important step in ensuring the privacy and security of machine learning systems, especially as they are deployed in sensitive applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining the unlearning problem and introducing necessary notation. The authors then identify limitations in existing unlearning benchmarks, such as unrealistic dataset sizes and the lack of sensitive attributes that users may want to remove.
To address these issues, the authors propose new datasets and evaluation metrics:
- Sensitive Attribute Unlearning: Datasets that contain sensitive user attributes, such as race or gender, that the model should be able to forget.
- Instance-level Unlearning: Datasets where the model must unlearn the information of specific training instances, rather than just attributes.
- Unlearning Efficiency: Metrics that measure the computational cost and time required to perform unlearning, in addition to the traditional accuracy-based metrics.
The paper then provides a detailed technical explanation of how these new benchmarks are constructed and evaluated. The authors also discuss the implications of their findings and identify areas for future research, such as the need for more careful evaluations of inexact unlearning methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed set of benchmarks for evaluating machine unlearning. The authors have clearly identified limitations in existing approaches and have developed new datasets and metrics to address these shortcomings.
One potential limitation of the proposed benchmarks is the focus on specific types of sensitive attributes, such as race and gender. While these are important examples, there may be other types of sensitive information that users may want to remove from machine learning models, and the benchmarks should be flexible enough to accommodate a wider range of use cases.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the implications of machine unlearning for large language models, which have become increasingly prominent in recent years. As these models are often trained on vast amounts of online data, the ability to effectively unlearn specific information may become even more crucial.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper presents a significant contribution to the field of machine unlearning and provides a solid foundation for future research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper proposes improved benchmarks for evaluating machine unlearning, a technique that allows machine learning models to forget specific training data. The authors address limitations in existing benchmarks by introducing new datasets and metrics that better capture the performance of unlearning methods.
By using these enhanced benchmarks, researchers and developers can more accurately assess the effectiveness and efficiency of machine unlearning, which is crucial for ensuring the privacy and security of machine learning systems. The paper's findings and the proposed benchmarks represent an important step forward in the field of machine unlearning and its practical applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Adversarial Machine Unlearning
Zonglin Di, Sixie Yu, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Yang Liu
0
0
This paper focuses on the challenge of machine unlearning, aiming to remove the influence of specific training data on machine learning models. Traditionally, the development of unlearning algorithms runs parallel with that of membership inference attacks (MIA), a type of privacy threat to determine whether a data instance was used for training. However, the two strands are intimately connected: one can view machine unlearning through the lens of MIA success with respect to removed data. Recognizing this connection, we propose a game-theoretic framework that integrates MIAs into the design of unlearning algorithms. Specifically, we model the unlearning problem as a Stackelberg game in which an unlearner strives to unlearn specific training data from a model, while an auditor employs MIAs to detect the traces of the ostensibly removed data. Adopting this adversarial perspective allows the utilization of new attack advancements, facilitating the design of unlearning algorithms. Our framework stands out in two ways. First, it takes an adversarial approach and proactively incorporates the attacks into the design of unlearning algorithms. Secondly, it uses implicit differentiation to obtain the gradients that limit the attacker's success, thus benefiting the process of unlearning. We present empirical results to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for machine unlearning.
6/13/2024
⛏️
Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey
Weiqi Wang, Zhiyi Tian, Shui Yu
0
0
As the right to be forgotten has been legislated worldwide, many studies attempt to design unlearning mechanisms to protect users' privacy when they want to leave machine learning service platforms. Specifically, machine unlearning is to make a trained model to remove the contribution of an erased subset of the training dataset. This survey aims to systematically classify a wide range of machine unlearning and discuss their differences, connections and open problems. We categorize current unlearning methods into four scenarios: centralized unlearning, distributed and irregular data unlearning, unlearning verification, and privacy and security issues in unlearning. Since centralized unlearning is the primary domain, we use two parts to introduce: firstly, we classify centralized unlearning into exact unlearning and approximate unlearning; secondly, we offer a detailed introduction to the techniques of these methods. Besides the centralized unlearning, we notice some studies about distributed and irregular data unlearning and introduce federated unlearning and graph unlearning as the two representative directions. After introducing unlearning methods, we review studies about unlearning verification. Moreover, we consider the privacy and security issues essential in machine unlearning and organize the latest related literature. Finally, we discuss the challenges of various unlearning scenarios and address the potential research directions.
5/14/2024
Towards Reliable Empirical Machine Unlearning Evaluation: A Game-Theoretic View
Yiwen Tu, Pingbang Hu, Jiaqi Ma
0
0
Machine unlearning is the process of updating machine learning models to remove the information of specific training data samples, in order to comply with data protection regulations that allow individuals to request the removal of their personal data. Despite the recent development of numerous unlearning algorithms, reliable evaluation of these algorithms remains an open research question. In this work, we focus on membership inference attack (MIA) based evaluation, one of the most common approaches for evaluating unlearning algorithms, and address various pitfalls of existing evaluation metrics that lack reliability. Specifically, we propose a game-theoretic framework that formalizes the evaluation process as a game between unlearning algorithms and MIA adversaries, measuring the data removal efficacy of unlearning algorithms by the capability of the MIA adversaries. Through careful design of the game, we demonstrate that the natural evaluation metric induced from the game enjoys provable guarantees that the existing evaluation metrics fail to satisfy. Furthermore, we propose a practical and efficient algorithm to estimate the evaluation metric induced from the game, and demonstrate its effectiveness through both theoretical analysis and empirical experiments. This work presents a novel and reliable approach to empirically evaluating unlearning algorithms, paving the way for the development of more effective unlearning techniques.
6/13/2024
Jogging the Memory of Unlearned Model Through Targeted Relearning Attack
Shengyuan Hu, Yiwei Fu, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Virginia Smith
0
0
Machine unlearning is a promising approach to mitigate undesirable memorization of training data in ML models. However, in this work we show that existing approaches for unlearning in LLMs are surprisingly susceptible to a simple set of targeted relearning attacks. With access to only a small and potentially loosely related set of data, we find that we can 'jog' the memory of unlearned models to reverse the effects of unlearning. We formalize this unlearning-relearning pipeline, explore the attack across three popular unlearning benchmarks, and discuss future directions and guidelines that result from our study.
6/21/2024