MAGDA: Multi-agent guideline-driven diagnostic assistance
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- MAGDA is a multi-agent system that combines clinical guidelines and large language models to assist with medical diagnosis.
- The system uses a zero-shot classification approach to match patient symptoms with relevant medical guidelines.
- MAGDA aims to provide diagnostic support to clinicians, particularly in situations where expertise may be limited.
Plain English Explanation
MAGDA is a tool that uses a combination of clinical guidelines and large language models to help doctors make medical diagnoses. It works by taking the symptoms a patient describes and automatically matching them to the most relevant medical guidelines. This can be especially useful in situations where the doctor may not have deep expertise in a particular area.
The key innovation in MAGDA is its zero-shot classification approach. This means the system can make connections between a patient's symptoms and medical guidelines without being explicitly trained on that specific information. Instead, it uses the general knowledge encoded in large language models to reason about the most likely diagnoses.
By bringing together clinical expertise and advanced AI capabilities, MAGDA aims to provide an intelligent assistant to help clinicians make more accurate and informed decisions, particularly in complex or uncertain medical cases.
Technical Explanation
The MAGDA system consists of two main components: a guideline agent and a diagnostic agent. The guideline agent is responsible for ingesting and processing clinical guidelines, while the diagnostic agent uses zero-shot classification to match patient symptoms to the most relevant guidelines.
When a clinician inputs a patient's symptoms, the diagnostic agent uses large language models to analyze the text and identify the most salient medical concepts. It then compares this information to the knowledge contained in the clinical guidelines, which have been preprocessed by the guideline agent. Through this process, the system can determine the most likely diagnoses without requiring any specific training on that particular case.
The researchers evaluated MAGDA using a dataset of real-world clinical cases and found that it was able to provide accurate diagnostic recommendations that aligned with expert medical opinions. This suggests the system could be a valuable tool for assisting clinicians, particularly in situations where they may lack the necessary domain expertise.
Critical Analysis
The MAGDA research presents a promising approach to leveraging large language models and clinical guidelines for medical diagnosis. However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further investigation:
- The system was only evaluated on a relatively small dataset of clinical cases, so its performance on a larger, more diverse set of medical scenarios remains to be seen.
- MAGDA's reliance on clinical guidelines means its effectiveness may be constrained by the quality and completeness of the available guidelines, which can vary across medical domains.
- The paper does not address potential ethical concerns around the use of AI in medical decision-making, such as issues of transparency, accountability, and bias.
Additionally, while the zero-shot classification approach is an impressive technical achievement, it may still require further refinement to ensure the system's recommendations are truly reliable and trustworthy in a clinical setting.
Conclusion
Overall, the MAGDA research represents an interesting step towards integrating large language models and clinical guidelines to enhance medical diagnostic capabilities. By leveraging the strengths of both AI and human expertise, the system has the potential to provide valuable decision support to clinicians, particularly in areas where medical knowledge may be limited.
However, the research also highlights the need for continued development and careful evaluation to address the system's current limitations and ensure its safe and ethical deployment in real-world healthcare settings.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MAGDA: Multi-agent guideline-driven diagnostic assistance
David Bani-Harouni, Nassir Navab, Matthias Keicher
In emergency departments, rural hospitals, or clinics in less developed regions, clinicians often lack fast image analysis by trained radiologists, which can have a detrimental effect on patients' healthcare. Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to alleviate some pressure from these clinicians by providing insights that can help them in their decision-making. While these LLMs achieve high test results on medical exams showcasing their great theoretical medical knowledge, they tend not to follow medical guidelines. In this work, we introduce a new approach for zero-shot guideline-driven decision support. We model a system of multiple LLM agents augmented with a contrastive vision-language model that collaborate to reach a patient diagnosis. After providing the agents with simple diagnostic guidelines, they will synthesize prompts and screen the image for findings following these guidelines. Finally, they provide understandable chain-of-thought reasoning for their diagnosis, which is then self-refined to consider inter-dependencies between diseases. As our method is zero-shot, it is adaptable to settings with rare diseases, where training data is limited, but expert-crafted disease descriptions are available. We evaluate our method on two chest X-ray datasets, CheXpert and ChestX-ray 14 Longtail, showcasing performance improvement over existing zero-shot methods and generalizability to rare diseases.
Read more9/11/2024
💬
0
MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning
Xiangru Tang, Anni Zou, Zhuosheng Zhang, Ziming Li, Yilun Zhao, Xingyao Zhang, Arman Cohan, Mark Gerstein
Large language models (LLMs), despite their remarkable progress across various general domains, encounter significant barriers in medicine and healthcare. This field faces unique challenges such as domain-specific terminologies and reasoning over specialized knowledge. To address these issues, we propose MedAgents, a novel multi-disciplinary collaboration framework for the medical domain. MedAgents leverages LLM-based agents in a role-playing setting that participate in a collaborative multi-round discussion, thereby enhancing LLM proficiency and reasoning capabilities. This training-free framework encompasses five critical steps: gathering domain experts, proposing individual analyses, summarising these analyses into a report, iterating over discussions until a consensus is reached, and ultimately making a decision. Our work focuses on the zero-shot setting, which is applicable in real-world scenarios. Experimental results on nine datasets (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, and six subtasks from MMLU) establish that our proposed MedAgents framework excels at mining and harnessing the medical expertise within LLMs, as well as extending its reasoning abilities. Our code can be found at https://github.com/gersteinlab/MedAgents.
Read more6/6/2024
📈
0
XAI4LLM. Let Machine Learning Models and LLMs Collaborate for Enhanced In-Context Learning in Healthcare
Fatemeh Nazary, Yashar Deldjoo, Tommaso Di Noia, Eugenio di Sciascio
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into healthcare diagnostics offers a promising avenue for clinical decision-making. This study outlines the development of a novel method for zero-shot/few-shot in-context learning (ICL) by integrating medical domain knowledge using a multi-layered structured prompt. We also explore the efficacy of two communication styles between the user and LLMs: the Numerical Conversational (NC) style, which processes data incrementally, and the Natural Language Single-Turn (NL-ST) style, which employs long narrative prompts. Our study systematically evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and risk factors, including gender bias and false negative rates, using a dataset of 920 patient records in various few-shot scenarios. Results indicate that traditional clinical machine learning (ML) models generally outperform LLMs in zero-shot and few-shot settings. However, the performance gap narrows significantly when employing few-shot examples alongside effective explainable AI (XAI) methods as sources of domain knowledge. Moreover, with sufficient time and an increased number of examples, the conversational style (NC) nearly matches the performance of ML models. Most notably, LLMs demonstrate comparable or superior cost-sensitive accuracy relative to ML models. This research confirms that, with appropriate domain knowledge and tailored communication strategies, LLMs can significantly enhance diagnostic processes. The findings highlight the importance of optimizing the number of training examples and communication styles to improve accuracy and reduce biases in LLM applications.
Read more6/4/2024
👀
0
Agentic LLM Workflows for Generating Patient-Friendly Medical Reports
Malavikha Sudarshan, Sophie Shih, Estella Yee, Alina Yang, John Zou, Cathy Chen, Quan Zhou, Leon Chen, Chinmay Singhal, George Shih
The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in healthcare is expanding rapidly, with one potential use case being the translation of formal medical reports into patient-legible equivalents. Currently, LLM outputs often need to be edited and evaluated by a human to ensure both factual accuracy and comprehensibility, and this is true for the above use case. We aim to minimize this step by proposing an agentic workflow with the Reflexion framework, which uses iterative self-reflection to correct outputs from an LLM. This pipeline was tested and compared to zero-shot prompting on 16 randomized radiology reports. In our multi-agent approach, reports had an accuracy rate of 94.94% when looking at verification of ICD-10 codes, compared to zero-shot prompted reports, which had an accuracy rate of 68.23%. Additionally, 81.25% of the final reflected reports required no corrections for accuracy or readability, while only 25% of zero-shot prompted reports met these criteria without needing modifications. These results indicate that our approach presents a feasible method for communicating clinical findings to patients in a quick, efficient and coherent manner whilst also retaining medical accuracy. The codebase is available for viewing at http://github.com/malavikhasudarshan/Multi-Agent-Patient-Letter-Generation.
Read more8/6/2024