Human-AI Safety: A Descendant of Generative AI and Control Systems Safety
2405.09794
0
0
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is interacting with people at an unprecedented scale, offering new avenues for immense positive impact, but also raising widespread concerns around the potential for individual and societal harm. Today, the predominant paradigm for human--AI safety focuses on fine-tuning the generative model's outputs to better agree with human-provided examples or feedback. In reality, however, the consequences of an AI model's outputs cannot be determined in isolation: they are tightly entangled with the responses and behavior of human users over time. In this paper, we distill key complementary lessons from AI safety and control systems safety, highlighting open challenges as well as key synergies between both fields. We then argue that meaningful safety assurances for advanced AI technologies require reasoning about how the feedback loop formed by AI outputs and human behavior may drive the interaction towards different outcomes. To this end, we introduce a unifying formalism to capture dynamic, safety-critical human--AI interactions and propose a concrete technical roadmap towards next-generation human-centered AI safety.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the intersection of generative AI systems and control theory principles to develop a framework for ensuring the safety and robustness of human-AI interactions.
- It proposes a "Human-AI Safety" approach that aims to align AI systems with human values and needs, rather than just optimizing for narrow performance metrics.
- The framework draws on concepts from Towards Guaranteed Safe AI, The Frontier of AI Ethics, and other related research on ethical and safety considerations in advanced AI.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about developing a new way to make AI systems that work safely and reliably with humans. It combines ideas from two different fields - generative AI (AI that can create new content) and control theory (a way of designing systems to behave in a predictable, controlled way).
The key insight is that we shouldn't just focus on making AI systems perform well on specific tasks. We also need to ensure they are aligned with human values and fulfill our real needs, not just narrow objectives. The authors call this "Human-AI Safety" - ensuring the AI does what's best for humans, not just what we tell it to do.
This builds on previous work on ethical AI and safety considerations in advanced AI systems. The goal is to create AI assistants that are reliable, trustworthy partners for humans, not just powerful but unpredictable tools.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for "Human-AI Safety" that combines ideas from generative AI and control theory. The key elements include:
-
Values vs. Needs: Rather than just optimizing for specific performance metrics, the framework aims to align AI systems with human values and broader "needs" - the fundamental things that are important to people, beyond just tasks or outputs.
-
Safe Interaction Patterns: Drawing on control theory, the framework specifies patterns of safe, stable interaction between humans and AI systems. This includes mechanisms for the AI to monitor its own behavior, detect potential safety issues, and take appropriate mitigating actions.
-
Ethical Considerations: The framework incorporates ethical principles and frameworks, such as those discussed in The Frontier of AI Ethics and Not My Voice, to ensure the AI system behaves in alignment with human values.
-
Responsibility Evaluation: The framework includes a process for holistically evaluating the safety and ethical responsibility of advanced AI systems, going beyond just technical performance.
Overall, the paper presents a comprehensive approach to shaping human-technology assemblages in the age of powerful generative AI, with the goal of ensuring these systems are reliable, trustworthy, and beneficial partners for humans.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the need to go beyond narrow optimization of AI systems and instead focus on aligning them with broader human values and needs. The proposed framework draws on important prior work in AI safety and ethics, which is a strength.
However, the authors acknowledge that fully specifying and implementing such a comprehensive framework poses significant technical and conceptual challenges. Translating abstract values into concrete design requirements, and then verifying that an AI system upholds those values, is an extremely difficult problem.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into some of the thornier philosophical and practical questions around defining "human values" and negotiating conflicts between different stakeholder values. These are areas that would benefit from further exploration and debate.
Overall, the paper presents a thoughtful and ambitious vision for ensuring the safety and ethical responsibility of advanced AI systems. While the challenges are substantial, the core ideas are an important step towards developing AI assistants that are truly beneficial and trustworthy partners for humans.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a "Human-AI Safety" framework that aims to align generative AI systems with human values and broader needs, rather than just narrow performance metrics. By drawing on concepts from control theory and ethical AI frameworks, the approach seeks to ensure these powerful AI assistants behave in reliable, trustworthy, and socially responsible ways.
While the technical and conceptual challenges are significant, the core ideas represent an important step forward in shaping human-technology assemblages for the age of advanced generative AI. As these systems become increasingly capable and ubiquitous, frameworks like this will be crucial for ensuring they are a positive force for humanity.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems
David davidad Dalrymple, Joar Skalse, Yoshua Bengio, Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Sanjit Seshia, Steve Omohundro, Christian Szegedy, Ben Goldhaber, Nora Ammann, Alessandro Abate, Joe Halpern, Clark Barrett, Ding Zhao, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Jeannette Wing, Joshua Tenenbaum
0
0
Ensuring that AI systems reliably and robustly avoid harmful or dangerous behaviours is a crucial challenge, especially for AI systems with a high degree of autonomy and general intelligence, or systems used in safety-critical contexts. In this paper, we will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. This is achieved by the interplay of three core components: a world model (which provides a mathematical description of how the AI system affects the outside world), a safety specification (which is a mathematical description of what effects are acceptable), and a verifier (which provides an auditable proof certificate that the AI satisfies the safety specification relative to the world model). We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them. We also argue for the necessity of this approach to AI safety, and for the inadequacy of the main alternative approaches.
5/20/2024
🤖
Frontier AI Ethics: Anticipating and Evaluating the Societal Impacts of Generative Agents
Seth Lazar
0
0
Some have criticised Generative AI Systems for replicating the familiar pathologies of already widely-deployed AI systems. Other critics highlight how they foreshadow vastly more powerful future systems, which might threaten humanity's survival. The first group says there is nothing new here; the other looks through the present to a perhaps distant horizon. In this paper, I instead pay attention to what makes these particular systems distinctive: both their remarkable scientific achievement, and the most likely and consequential ways in which they will change society over the next five to ten years. In particular, I explore the potential societal impacts and normative questions raised by the looming prospect of 'Generative Agents', in which multimodal large language models (LLMs) form the executive centre of complex, tool-using AI systems that can take unsupervised sequences of actions towards some goal.
4/11/2024
🤖
Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress
Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Andrew Yao, Dawn Song, Pieter Abbeel, Trevor Darrell, Yuval Noah Harari, Ya-Qin Zhang, Lan Xue, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Gillian Hadfield, Jeff Clune, Tegan Maharaj, Frank Hutter, At{i}l{i}m Gunec{s} Baydin, Sheila McIlraith, Qiqi Gao, Ashwin Acharya, David Krueger, Anca Dragan, Philip Torr, Stuart Russell, Daniel Kahneman, Jan Brauner, Soren Mindermann
0
0
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is progressing rapidly, and companies are shifting their focus to developing generalist AI systems that can autonomously act and pursue goals. Increases in capabilities and autonomy may soon massively amplify AI's impact, with risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and an irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. Although researchers have warned of extreme risks from AI, there is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Society's response, despite promising first steps, is incommensurate with the possibility of rapid, transformative progress that is expected by many experts. AI safety research is lagging. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems. In this short consensus paper, we describe extreme risks from upcoming, advanced AI systems. Drawing on lessons learned from other safety-critical technologies, we then outline a comprehensive plan combining technical research and development with proactive, adaptive governance mechanisms for a more commensurate preparation.
5/24/2024
Sociotechnical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Access
Bhaskar Mitra, Henriette Cramer, Olya Gurevich
0
0
Robust access to trustworthy information is a critical need for society with implications for knowledge production, public health education, and promoting informed citizenry in democratic societies. Generative AI technologies may enable new ways to access information and improve effectiveness of existing information retrieval systems but we are only starting to understand and grapple with their long-term social implications. In this chapter, we present an overview of some of the systemic consequences and risks of employing generative AI in the context of information access. We also provide recommendations for evaluation and mitigation, and discuss challenges for future research.
5/21/2024