Manifold Integrated Gradients: Riemannian Geometry for Feature Attribution

Read original: arXiv:2405.09800 - Published 5/17/2024 by Eslam Zaher, Maciej Trzaskowski, Quan Nguyen, Fred Roosta
Total Score

0

Manifold Integrated Gradients: Riemannian Geometry for Feature Attribution

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new method called "Manifold Integrated Gradients" for feature attribution in machine learning models.
  • Feature attribution aims to explain the importance of different input features in a model's predictions.
  • The proposed method uses Riemannian geometry to capture the curvature of the input manifold, providing a more accurate and meaningful measure of feature importance.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to understand how machine learning models make their predictions. When we use a model to make a decision, we often want to know which parts of the input data were most important for that decision. This is called "feature attribution."

The authors of this paper introduce a novel technique called "Manifold Integrated Gradients" that improves upon existing feature attribution methods. Their key insight is that the shape, or "curvature," of the input data manifold - the space of all possible inputs - can provide valuable information about feature importance.

By incorporating this geometric perspective, Manifold Integrated Gradients can capture more nuanced relationships between the input features and the model's output. This leads to more accurate and interpretable explanations of the model's reasoning. [The paper cites related work on <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/integrated-gradient-correlation-dataset-wise-attribution-method">Integrated Gradients</a>, <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/transforming-gradient-based-techniques-into-interpretable-methods">transforming gradient-based techniques</a>, and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/gradient-like-explanation-under-black-box-setting">gradient-like explanations</a>.]

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on various machine learning tasks, showing that it outperforms existing feature attribution techniques. This work has the potential to make machine learning models more transparent and trustworthy, which is an important goal for the field.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new method called "Manifold Integrated Gradients" (MIG) for feature attribution in machine learning models. Feature attribution aims to identify which input features are most important for a model's predictions.

MIG builds upon the Integrated Gradients (IG) method, which computes feature importance by integrating the gradients along a path from a baseline input to the target input. The authors observe that IG can be sensitive to the choice of baseline and does not fully capture the geometry of the input manifold.

To address these limitations, MIG incorporates Riemannian geometry to compute feature attributions. Specifically, MIG defines a Riemannian metric on the input manifold and uses it to compute the path integral of the gradients. This Riemannian path integral provides a more accurate and meaningful measure of feature importance that accounts for the curvature of the input manifold.

The authors evaluate MIG on various machine learning tasks, including image classification, text classification, and tabular data prediction. They show that MIG outperforms existing feature attribution methods, such as Integrated Gradients and Gradient Shap, in terms of faithfulness to the model's behavior and alignment with human intuition. [The paper also cites related work on <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/predicting-enhancing-fairness-dnns-curvature-perceptual-manifolds">predicting and enhancing fairness of DNNs through curvature of perceptual manifolds</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/unveiling-mitigating-generalized-biases-dnns-through-intrinsic">unveiling and mitigating generalized biases in DNNs through intrinsic manifold structure</a>.]

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to feature attribution that leverages Riemannian geometry to capture the curvature of the input manifold. This seems to be a meaningful advance over existing gradient-based methods, which can be sensitive to the choice of baseline and do not fully account for the underlying geometry of the input space.

One potential limitation of the MIG method is the computational overhead required to compute the Riemannian path integral. The authors acknowledge this and suggest potential optimization techniques, but the runtime complexity may be a concern for large-scale or real-time applications.

Additionally, while the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of MIG on a variety of tasks, it would be valuable to see further evaluation on a wider range of models and datasets, including more complex and challenging problems. This could help validate the robustness and generalizability of the method.

Finally, the paper does not discuss potential biases or limitations of the Riemannian geometry approach. It would be important to consider how the choice of metric and manifold structure might influence the feature attributions, and whether there are any scenarios where MIG could produce misleading or counterintuitive results.

Overall, this paper presents a promising new direction for feature attribution that leverages the geometric structure of the input data. Further exploration and refinement of this approach could lead to more trustworthy and interpretable machine learning models.

Conclusion

The "Manifold Integrated Gradients" method introduced in this paper offers a novel approach to feature attribution that incorporates Riemannian geometry to capture the curvature of the input manifold. By computing feature importance based on a Riemannian path integral, the method provides more accurate and meaningful explanations of a model's predictions.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their technique on various machine learning tasks, showing that it outperforms existing feature attribution methods. This work has the potential to significantly improve the interpretability and trustworthiness of machine learning models, which is a crucial aspect of their real-world deployment and adoption.

While the computational complexity of the Riemannian approach may be a practical concern, the paper's insights into the geometric structure of the input data and its influence on feature importance open up exciting avenues for future research. Continued development and refinement of this technique could lead to more robust and reliable methods for understanding and interpreting the decision-making of complex machine learning models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Manifold Integrated Gradients: Riemannian Geometry for Feature Attribution
Total Score

0

Manifold Integrated Gradients: Riemannian Geometry for Feature Attribution

Eslam Zaher, Maciej Trzaskowski, Quan Nguyen, Fred Roosta

In this paper, we dive into the reliability concerns of Integrated Gradients (IG), a prevalent feature attribution method for black-box deep learning models. We particularly address two predominant challenges associated with IG: the generation of noisy feature visualizations for vision models and the vulnerability to adversarial attributional attacks. Our approach involves an adaptation of path-based feature attribution, aligning the path of attribution more closely to the intrinsic geometry of the data manifold. Our experiments utilise deep generative models applied to several real-world image datasets. They demonstrate that IG along the geodesics conforms to the curved geometry of the Riemannian data manifold, generating more perceptually intuitive explanations and, subsequently, substantially increasing robustness to targeted attributional attacks.

Read more

5/17/2024

IG2: Integrated Gradient on Iterative Gradient Path for Feature Attribution
Total Score

0

IG2: Integrated Gradient on Iterative Gradient Path for Feature Attribution

Yue Zhuo, Zhiqiang Ge

Feature attribution explains Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the instance level by providing importance scores of input features' contributions to model prediction. Integrated Gradients (IG) is a prominent path attribution method for deep neural networks, involving the integration of gradients along a path from the explained input (explicand) to a counterfactual instance (baseline). Current IG variants primarily focus on the gradient of explicand's output. However, our research indicates that the gradient of the counterfactual output significantly affects feature attribution as well. To achieve this, we propose Iterative Gradient path Integrated Gradients (IG2), considering both gradients. IG2 incorporates the counterfactual gradient iteratively into the integration path, generating a novel path (GradPath) and a novel baseline (GradCF). These two novel IG components effectively address the issues of attribution noise and arbitrary baseline choice in earlier IG methods. IG2, as a path method, satisfies many desirable axioms, which are theoretically justified in the paper. Experimental results on XAI benchmark, ImageNet, MNIST, TREC questions answering, wafer-map failure patterns, and CelebA face attributes validate that IG2 delivers superior feature attributions compared to the state-of-the-art techniques. The code is released at: https://github.com/JoeZhuo-ZY/IG2.

Read more

6/18/2024

📉

Total Score

0

The Manifold Hypothesis for Gradient-Based Explanations

Sebastian Bordt, Uddeshya Upadhyay, Zeynep Akata, Ulrike von Luxburg

When do gradient-based explanation algorithms provide perceptually-aligned explanations? We propose a criterion: the feature attributions need to be aligned with the tangent space of the data manifold. To provide evidence for this hypothesis, we introduce a framework based on variational autoencoders that allows to estimate and generate image manifolds. Through experiments across a range of different datasets -- MNIST, EMNIST, CIFAR10, X-ray pneumonia and Diabetic Retinopathy detection -- we demonstrate that the more a feature attribution is aligned with the tangent space of the data, the more perceptually-aligned it tends to be. We then show that the attributions provided by popular post-hoc methods such as Integrated Gradients and SmoothGrad are more strongly aligned with the data manifold than the raw gradient. Adversarial training also improves the alignment of model gradients with the data manifold. As a consequence, we suggest that explanation algorithms should actively strive to align their explanations with the data manifold. This is an extended version of a CVPR Workshop paper. Code is available at https://github.com/tml-tuebingen/explanations-manifold.

Read more

7/16/2024

Integrated Gradient Correlation: a Dataset-wise Attribution Method
Total Score

0

Integrated Gradient Correlation: a Dataset-wise Attribution Method

Pierre Leli`evre (National Taiwan University), Chien-Chung Chen (National Taiwan University)

Attribution methods are primarily designed to study the distribution of input component contributions to individual model predictions. However, some research applications require a summary of attribution patterns across the entire dataset to facilitate the interpretability of the scrutinized models. In this paper, we present a new method called Integrated Gradient Correlation (IGC) that relates dataset-wise attributions to a model prediction score and enables region-specific analysis by a direct summation over associated components. We demonstrate our method on scalar predictions with the study of image feature representation in the brain from fMRI neural signals and the estimation of neural population receptive fields (NSD dataset), as well as on categorical predictions with the investigation of handwritten digit recognition (MNIST dataset). The resulting IGC attributions show selective patterns, revealing underlying model strategies coherent with their respective objectives.

Read more

4/23/2024