The Manifold Hypothesis for Gradient-Based Explanations
0
📉
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a criterion for when gradient-based explanation algorithms provide perceptually-aligned explanations
- Introduces a framework based on variational autoencoders to estimate and generate image manifolds
- Demonstrates that feature attributions more aligned with the data manifold are more perceptually-aligned
- Shows that popular attribution methods like Integrated Gradients and SmoothGrad are better aligned with the data manifold than raw gradients
- Suggests that explanation algorithms should actively strive to align their explanations with the data manifold
Plain English Explanation
When do machine learning models provide explanations that match human perception? The key is that the feature attributions (which parts of the input contributed most to the output) need to align with the intrinsic "manifold" or structure of the data.
The researchers introduce a framework using variational autoencoders to model and generate this data manifold. They show that attribution methods like Integrated Gradients and SmoothGrad are better aligned with the manifold than raw gradients. This suggests that explanation algorithms should try to produce attributions that closely match the underlying structure of the data.
The experiments cover a range of datasets, from handwritten digits to medical images. The takeaway is that by understanding the data's intrinsic geometry, we can generate more human-aligned explanations for black-box machine learning models.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes that gradient-based explanation algorithms will provide perceptually-aligned explanations when the feature attributions are aligned with the tangent space of the data manifold. To test this, the authors introduce a framework based on variational autoencoders (VAEs) to estimate and generate the image manifold.
Through experiments on datasets like MNIST, CIFAR10, and medical images, they demonstrate that feature attributions more closely aligned with the data manifold are more perceptually-aligned. They show that popular post-hoc methods like Integrated Gradients and SmoothGrad produce attributions that are better aligned with the data manifold than raw gradients.
The authors also find that adversarial training, which makes the model more robust, improves the alignment of model gradients with the data manifold. This suggests that explanation algorithms should actively strive to align their explanations with the underlying data structure.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling framework for understanding when gradient-based explanations are perceptually-aligned, and offers a clear path forward for improving the quality of model explanations. However, a few caveats and areas for further research are worth noting:
- The VAE-based manifold estimation approach relies on strong assumptions about the data distribution. More flexible or data-driven manifold learning techniques could provide additional insights.
- The paper focuses on image data, but the principles may not transfer as readily to other modalities like text or tabular data. Manifold learning for these domains remains an open challenge.
- While the paper demonstrates that certain attribution methods are better aligned with the manifold, it does not explore how to directly optimize explanations for this property. Developing such techniques could be a fruitful area of future work.
Overall, the research represents an important step towards more human-aligned model explanations, but there is still much to be explored at the intersection of Riemannian geometry, generative models, and interpretable machine learning.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a principled criterion for when gradient-based explanation algorithms will provide perceptually-aligned explanations: the feature attributions must be aligned with the tangent space of the data manifold. By introducing a VAE-based framework to estimate and generate this manifold, the authors demonstrate that more manifold-aligned attributions tend to be more human-interpretable.
The findings suggest that explanation methods should actively seek to align their outputs with the underlying structure of the data, rather than relying solely on raw gradients. This insight opens up new directions for developing more interpretable and trustworthy machine learning models, with potential applications across domains like medical imaging, autonomous systems, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
0
The Manifold Hypothesis for Gradient-Based Explanations
Sebastian Bordt, Uddeshya Upadhyay, Zeynep Akata, Ulrike von Luxburg
When do gradient-based explanation algorithms provide perceptually-aligned explanations? We propose a criterion: the feature attributions need to be aligned with the tangent space of the data manifold. To provide evidence for this hypothesis, we introduce a framework based on variational autoencoders that allows to estimate and generate image manifolds. Through experiments across a range of different datasets -- MNIST, EMNIST, CIFAR10, X-ray pneumonia and Diabetic Retinopathy detection -- we demonstrate that the more a feature attribution is aligned with the tangent space of the data, the more perceptually-aligned it tends to be. We then show that the attributions provided by popular post-hoc methods such as Integrated Gradients and SmoothGrad are more strongly aligned with the data manifold than the raw gradient. Adversarial training also improves the alignment of model gradients with the data manifold. As a consequence, we suggest that explanation algorithms should actively strive to align their explanations with the data manifold. This is an extended version of a CVPR Workshop paper. Code is available at https://github.com/tml-tuebingen/explanations-manifold.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Manifold Integrated Gradients: Riemannian Geometry for Feature Attribution
Eslam Zaher, Maciej Trzaskowski, Quan Nguyen, Fred Roosta
In this paper, we dive into the reliability concerns of Integrated Gradients (IG), a prevalent feature attribution method for black-box deep learning models. We particularly address two predominant challenges associated with IG: the generation of noisy feature visualizations for vision models and the vulnerability to adversarial attributional attacks. Our approach involves an adaptation of path-based feature attribution, aligning the path of attribution more closely to the intrinsic geometry of the data manifold. Our experiments utilise deep generative models applied to several real-world image datasets. They demonstrate that IG along the geodesics conforms to the curved geometry of the Riemannian data manifold, generating more perceptually intuitive explanations and, subsequently, substantially increasing robustness to targeted attributional attacks.
Read more5/17/2024
🤿
0
Deep Generative Models through the Lens of the Manifold Hypothesis: A Survey and New Connections
Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem, Brendan Leigh Ross, Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Anthony L. Caterini, Jesse C. Cresswell
In recent years there has been increased interest in understanding the interplay between deep generative models (DGMs) and the manifold hypothesis. Research in this area focuses on understanding the reasons why commonly-used DGMs succeed or fail at learning distributions supported on unknown low-dimensional manifolds, as well as developing new models explicitly designed to account for manifold-supported data. This manifold lens provides both clarity as to why some DGMs (e.g. diffusion models and some generative adversarial networks) empirically surpass others (e.g. likelihood-based models such as variational autoencoders, normalizing flows, or energy-based models) at sample generation, and guidance for devising more performant DGMs. We carry out the first survey of DGMs viewed through this lens, making two novel contributions along the way. First, we formally establish that numerical instability of high-dimensional likelihoods is unavoidable when modelling low-dimensional data. We then show that DGMs on learned representations of autoencoders can be interpreted as approximately minimizing Wasserstein distance: this result, which applies to latent diffusion models, helps justify their outstanding empirical results. The manifold lens provides a rich perspective from which to understand DGMs, which we aim to make more accessible and widespread.
Read more4/5/2024
🌐
0
On Gradient-like Explanation under a Black-box Setting: When Black-box Explanations Become as Good as White-box
Yi Cai, Gerhard Wunder
Attribution methods shed light on the explainability of data-driven approaches such as deep learning models by uncovering the most influential features in a to-be-explained decision. While determining feature attributions via gradients delivers promising results, the internal access required for acquiring gradients can be impractical under safety concerns, thus limiting the applicability of gradient-based approaches. In response to such limited flexibility, this paper presents methodAbr~(gradient-estimation-based explanation), an approach that produces gradient-like explanations through only query-level access. The proposed approach holds a set of fundamental properties for attribution methods, which are mathematically rigorously proved, ensuring the quality of its explanations. In addition to the theoretical analysis, with a focus on image data, the experimental results empirically demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over state-of-the-art black-box methods and its competitive performance compared to methods with full access.
Read more5/15/2024