Maximum a Posteriori Estimation for Linear Structural Dynamics Models Using Bayesian Optimization with Rational Polynomial Chaos Expansions

Read original: arXiv:2408.03569 - Published 8/9/2024 by Felix Schneider, Iason Papaioannou, Bruno Sudret, Gerhard Muller
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Bayesian analysis combines prior knowledge with measurement data to learn model parameters.
  • Commonly, the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate is used when only a point estimate of the parameters is needed.
  • The authors apply MAP estimation to structural dynamic models and use a rational polynomial chaos expansion (RPCE) surrogate model to reduce computational demands.
  • They propose an extension to an existing sparse Bayesian learning approach for RPCE and introduce a Bayesian optimization approach for adaptive experimental design.

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian analysis is a way of updating our understanding of a problem by combining what we already know (prior knowledge) with new information (measurement data). In this paper, the researchers focus on Bayesian analysis in the context of structural dynamic models, which describe how a system responds to different forces or inputs.

One common approach in Bayesian analysis is to find the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate, which is the single most likely set of parameter values given the prior knowledge and the new data. The researchers use this MAP estimation technique, but they face a challenge: repeatedly evaluating the structural dynamic model can be computationally expensive.

To address this, the researchers use a surrogate model - a simplified version of the original model that is faster to evaluate. Specifically, they use a rational polynomial chaos expansion (RPCE), which expresses the system's response as a ratio of two polynomials with complex coefficients.

The researchers then propose two key innovations:

  1. An extension to an existing sparse Bayesian learning approach for RPCE, which helps identify the important coefficients in the surrogate model.
  2. A Bayesian optimization approach that adaptively selects new sample points to evaluate, focusing on areas of the input space that are likely to have high objective function values.

By combining these two techniques, the researchers are able to significantly reduce the number of expensive model evaluations required for the MAP estimation problem.

Technical Explanation

The core of the researchers' approach is the use of a rational polynomial chaos expansion (RPCE) as a surrogate model for the structural dynamic system. RPCE expresses the system's frequency response as a ratio of two polynomials with complex coefficients. This surrogate model allows for faster evaluation compared to the original system.

To learn the RPCE model parameters, the researchers propose an extension to an existing sparse Bayesian learning approach. This involves using Laplace's approximation to estimate the posterior distribution of the denominator coefficients, which induces sparsity and helps identify the most important coefficients.

Additionally, the researchers introduce a Bayesian optimization approach to adaptively enrich the experimental design during the MAP estimation process. They use the expected improvement acquisition function to identify sample points in the input space that are likely to have large objective function values, based on the posterior distribution of the RPCE coefficients.

By combining the sparse Bayesian learning procedure with the sequential experimental design, the researchers are able to effectively reduce the number of expensive model evaluations required for the MAP estimation problem.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a comprehensive and well-designed approach to address the computational challenges associated with Bayesian parameter estimation in structural dynamic models. The use of the RPCE surrogate model and the proposed extensions to the sparse Bayesian learning and Bayesian optimization techniques are innovative and appear to be effective in reducing the number of expensive model evaluations.

However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations or caveats of the proposed methods. For example, the performance of the RPCE surrogate model and the Bayesian optimization approach may depend on the specific characteristics of the structural dynamic system being studied, and the researchers do not explore the sensitivity of their methods to different system properties or experimental conditions.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational efficiency gains achieved through the proposed approaches, nor does it compare the performance to other potential strategies for reducing the computational burden of Bayesian parameter estimation in this context.

Further research could investigate the robustness and generalizability of the presented methods, as well as explore potential extensions or modifications to address any identified limitations. It would also be valuable to see the methods applied to a wider range of structural dynamic systems to better understand their broader applicability.

Conclusion

In this paper, the researchers present a novel approach to Bayesian parameter estimation for structural dynamic models. By combining sparse Bayesian learning of a rational polynomial chaos expansion surrogate model with an adaptive Bayesian optimization strategy, they are able to significantly reduce the computational demands of the parameter estimation process.

The proposed methods have the potential to greatly improve the efficiency of Bayesian analysis in the context of structural dynamics, which is an important field with applications in areas such as civil engineering, aerospace, and mechanical engineering. The researchers' work represents an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to make Bayesian techniques more accessible and practical for real-world engineering problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Maximum a Posteriori Estimation for Linear Structural Dynamics Models Using Bayesian Optimization with Rational Polynomial Chaos Expansions

Felix Schneider, Iason Papaioannou, Bruno Sudret, Gerhard Muller

Bayesian analysis enables combining prior knowledge with measurement data to learn model parameters. Commonly, one resorts to computing the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate, when only a point estimate of the parameters is of interest. We apply MAP estimation in the context of structural dynamic models, where the system response can be described by the frequency response function. To alleviate high computational demands from repeated expensive model calls, we utilize a rational polynomial chaos expansion (RPCE) surrogate model that expresses the system frequency response as a rational of two polynomials with complex coefficients. We propose an extension to an existing sparse Bayesian learning approach for RPCE based on Laplace's approximation for the posterior distribution of the denominator coefficients. Furthermore, we introduce a Bayesian optimization approach, which allows to adaptively enrich the experimental design throughout the optimization process of MAP estimation. Thereby, we utilize the expected improvement acquisition function as a means to identify sample points in the input space that are possibly associated with large objective function values. The acquisition function is estimated through Monte Carlo sampling based on the posterior distribution of the expansion coefficients identified in the sparse Bayesian learning process. By combining the sparsity-inducing learning procedure with the sequential experimental design, we effectively reduce the number of model evaluations in the MAP estimation problem. We demonstrate the applicability of the presented methods on the parameter updating problem of an algebraic two-degree-of-freedom system and the finite element model of a cross-laminated timber plate.

Read more

8/9/2024

Graph Laplacian-based Bayesian Multi-fidelity Modeling
Total Score

0

Graph Laplacian-based Bayesian Multi-fidelity Modeling

Orazio Pinti, Jeremy M. Budd, Franca Hoffmann, Assad A. Oberai

We present a novel probabilistic approach for generating multi-fidelity data while accounting for errors inherent in both low- and high-fidelity data. In this approach a graph Laplacian constructed from the low-fidelity data is used to define a multivariate Gaussian prior density for the coordinates of the true data points. In addition, few high-fidelity data points are used to construct a conjugate likelihood term. Thereafter, Bayes rule is applied to derive an explicit expression for the posterior density which is also multivariate Gaussian. The maximum textit{a posteriori} (MAP) estimate of this density is selected to be the optimal multi-fidelity estimate. It is shown that the MAP estimate and the covariance of the posterior density can be determined through the solution of linear systems of equations. Thereafter, two methods, one based on spectral truncation and another based on a low-rank approximation, are developed to solve these equations efficiently. The multi-fidelity approach is tested on a variety of problems in solid and fluid mechanics with data that represents vectors of quantities of interest and discretized spatial fields in one and two dimensions. The results demonstrate that by utilizing a small fraction of high-fidelity data, the multi-fidelity approach can significantly improve the accuracy of a large collection of low-fidelity data points.

Read more

9/14/2024

Physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and uncertainty quantification
Total Score

0

Physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and uncertainty quantification

Himanshu Sharma, Luk'av{s} Nov'ak, Michael D. Shields

We present a novel physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion as a surrogate modeling method capable of performing both scientific machine learning (SciML) and uncertainty quantification (UQ) tasks. The proposed method possesses a unique capability: it seamlessly integrates SciML into UQ and vice versa, which allows it to quantify the uncertainties in SciML tasks effectively and leverage SciML for improved uncertainty assessment during UQ-related tasks. The proposed surrogate model can effectively incorporate a variety of physical constraints, such as governing partial differential equations (PDEs) with associated initial and boundary conditions constraints, inequality-type constraints (e.g., monotonicity, convexity, non-negativity, among others), and additional a priori information in the training process to supplement limited data. This ensures physically realistic predictions and significantly reduces the need for expensive computational model evaluations to train the surrogate model. Furthermore, the proposed method has a built-in uncertainty quantification (UQ) feature to efficiently estimate output uncertainties. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we apply it to a diverse set of problems, including linear/non-linear PDEs with deterministic and stochastic parameters, data-driven surrogate modeling of a complex physical system, and UQ of a stochastic system with parameters modeled as random fields.

Read more

5/14/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Adaptive Bayesian Optimization for High-Precision Motion Systems

Christopher Konig, Raamadaas Krishnadas, Efe C. Balta, Alisa Rupenyan

Controller tuning and parameter optimization are crucial in system design to improve closed-loop system performance. Bayesian optimization has been established as an efficient model-free controller tuning and adaptation method. However, Bayesian optimization methods are computationally expensive and therefore difficult to use in real-time critical scenarios. In this work, we propose a real-time purely data-driven, model-free approach for adaptive control, by online tuning low-level controller parameters. We base our algorithm on GoOSE, an algorithm for safe and sample-efficient Bayesian optimization, for handling performance and stability criteria. We introduce multiple computational and algorithmic modifications for computational efficiency and parallelization of optimization steps. We further evaluate the algorithm's performance on a real precision-motion system utilized in semiconductor industry applications by modifying the payload and reference stepsize and comparing it to an interpolated constrained optimization-based baseline approach.

Read more

4/24/2024