MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context

Read original: arXiv:2405.11290 - Published 7/1/2024 by Shaina Raza, Ananya Raval, Veronica Chatrath
Total Score

0

MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a method called MBIAS to mitigate bias in large language models while retaining their contextual information.
  • Large language models can absorb biases present in their training data, leading to unfair or undesirable outputs.
  • MBIAS aims to address this issue by debiasing the language model without significantly sacrificing its ability to understand and generate natural language.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models, such as GPT-3 and BERT, are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. However, these models can sometimes exhibit biases, such as stereotyping certain groups or producing discriminatory outputs. This is because the training data used to create these models may contain societal biases, which the models then learn and reflect in their behavior.

The MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context paper presents a new approach called MBIAS to address this problem. MBIAS aims to "debias" the language model, removing the problematic biases while still allowing the model to maintain its ability to understand and generate natural, contextual language.

The key idea behind MBIAS is to modify the training process of the language model in a way that removes biases without significantly impacting the model's overall performance. This is important because simply removing all biases from the model could make it less effective at understanding and generating human-like text, which would limit its usefulness.

The paper describes the technical details of how MBIAS works, but the main takeaway is that it provides a way to create more ethical and inclusive large language models that can be used in a wide range of applications, from chatbots to writing assistants, without sacrificing their core capabilities.

Technical Explanation

The MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context paper presents a novel approach called MBIAS to mitigate bias in large language models while preserving their contextual understanding.

The key components of the MBIAS method are:

  1. Debiasing Encoder: This module is trained to remove biases from the language model's representations, using techniques like adversarial training and contrastive learning.
  2. Biased Decoder: This module is trained on the original, biased training data to maintain the model's ability to generate natural, contextual language.
  3. Joint Training: The debiasing encoder and biased decoder are trained together, with the goal of retaining the model's contextual understanding while mitigating its biases.

The researchers evaluate MBIAS on several benchmark datasets and find that it effectively reduces problematic biases in the language model's outputs while preserving its overall performance on tasks like language generation and comprehension.

Critical Analysis

The MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context paper presents a promising approach to addressing bias in large language models, but it also raises some important considerations.

One potential limitation is that the MBIAS method may not be able to completely remove all forms of bias from the language model. The paper acknowledges that certain biases may be deeply ingrained in the training data or the model's architecture, and may be difficult to eliminate entirely.

Additionally, the researchers note that the MBIAS method could inadvertently introduce new biases or unintended consequences. For example, the debiasing process could lead to the model producing outputs that are less natural or coherent, or that fail to accurately reflect real-world linguistic patterns.

Further research is needed to explore the long-term impacts of applying MBIAS or similar debiasing techniques to large language models, and to understand how these models can be developed and deployed in a way that balances the need for fairness and inclusivity with the preservation of their core capabilities.

The MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context paper also does not address the broader societal and ethical implications of using large language models, such as their potential to amplify or perpetuate harmful biases, or their use in applications that could have significant impacts on people's lives.

Overall, the MBIAS method represents an important step forward in the effort to create more ethical and responsible large language models, but there is still much work to be done in this area. Researchers and developers in this field must continue to grapple with these complex challenges to ensure that these powerful AI systems are designed and used in a way that benefits society as a whole.

Conclusion

The MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context paper presents a novel approach called MBIAS that aims to mitigate bias in large language models while preserving their contextual understanding.

By using a debiasing encoder and a biased decoder trained jointly, MBIAS is able to reduce problematic biases in the language model's outputs without significantly sacrificing its overall performance on tasks like language generation and comprehension.

This research represents an important step forward in the effort to create more ethical and inclusive large language models, which have the potential to be used in a wide range of applications, from chatbots to writing assistants. However, the paper also highlights the need for further research to address the limitations and broader societal implications of these powerful AI systems.

As the development of large language models continues, it will be crucial for researchers and developers to prioritize the creation of safe, responsible, and equitable AI systems that can be deployed in a way that benefits society as a whole.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context
Total Score

0

MBIAS: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models While Retaining Context

Shaina Raza, Ananya Raval, Veronica Chatrath

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in diverse applications necessitates an assurance of safety without compromising the contextual integrity of the generated content. Traditional approaches, including safety-specific fine-tuning or adversarial testing, often yield safe outputs at the expense of contextual meaning. This can result in a diminished capacity to handle nuanced aspects of bias and toxicity, such as underrepresentation or negative portrayals across various demographics. To address these challenges, we introduce MBIAS, an LLM framework carefully instruction fine-tuned on a custom dataset designed specifically for safety interventions. MBIAS is designed to significantly reduce biases and toxic elements in LLM outputs while preserving the main information. This work also details our further use of LLMs: as annotator under human supervision and as evaluator of generated content. Empirical analysis reveals that MBIAS achieves a reduction in bias and toxicity by over 30% in standard evaluations, and by more than 90% in diverse demographic tests, highlighting the robustness of our approach. We make the dataset and the fine-tuned model available to the research community for further investigation and ensure reproducibility. The code for this project can be accessed here https://github.com/shainarazavi/MBIAS/tree/main. Warning: This paper contains examples that may be offensive or upsetting.

Read more

7/1/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey

Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed

Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.

Read more

7/16/2024

Exploring Safety-Utility Trade-Offs in Personalized Language Models
Total Score

0

Exploring Safety-Utility Trade-Offs in Personalized Language Models

Anvesh Rao Vijjini, Somnath Basu Roy Chowdhury, Snigdha Chaturvedi

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into daily applications, it is essential to ensure they operate fairly across diverse user demographics. In this work, we show that LLMs suffer from personalization bias, where their performance is impacted when they are personalized to a user's identity. We quantify personalization bias by evaluating the performance of LLMs along two axes - safety and utility. We measure safety by examining how benign LLM responses are to unsafe prompts with and without personalization. We measure utility by evaluating the LLM's performance on various tasks, including general knowledge, mathematical abilities, programming, and reasoning skills. We find that various LLMs, ranging from open-source models like Llama (Touvron et al., 2023) and Mistral (Jiang et al., 2023) to API-based ones like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o (Ouyang et al., 2022), exhibit significant variance in performance in terms of safety-utility trade-offs depending on the user's identity. Finally, we discuss several strategies to mitigate personalization bias using preference tuning and prompt-based defenses.

Read more

6/18/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Mimicking User Data: On Mitigating Fine-Tuning Risks in Closed Large Language Models

Francisco Eiras, Aleksandar Petrov, Phillip H. S. Torr, M. Pawan Kumar, Adel Bibi

Fine-tuning large language models on small, high-quality datasets can enhance their performance on specific downstream tasks. Recent research shows that fine-tuning on benign, instruction-following data can inadvertently undo the safety alignment process and increase a model's propensity to comply with harmful queries. Although critical, understanding and mitigating safety risks in well-defined tasks remains distinct from the instruction-following context due to structural differences in the data. Our work addresses the gap in our understanding of these risks across diverse types of data in closed models - where providers control how user data is utilized in the fine-tuning process. We demonstrate how malicious actors can subtly manipulate the structure of almost any task-specific dataset to foster significantly more dangerous model behaviors, while maintaining an appearance of innocuity and reasonable downstream task performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel mitigation strategy that mixes in safety data which mimics the task format and prompting style of the user data, showing this is more effective than existing baselines at re-establishing safety alignment while maintaining similar task performance.

Read more

7/2/2024