BiasKG: Adversarial Knowledge Graphs to Induce Bias in Large Language Models

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) have a vast amount of knowledge, allowing them to perform well on tasks requiring reasoning and knowledge
• However, LLMs can also learn and exhibit social biases, which can be harmful to society
• Researchers have proposed many strategies to mitigate the safety risks of LLMs, but it is unclear how effective they are at eliminating biases
• This work proposes a new approach to attack LLMs by constructing a knowledge graph of stereotypes and using adversarial techniques to induce biased responses
• The researchers find that their method increases bias in various LLMs, even those with safety measures, highlighting the need for further research in AI safety

Plain English Explanation

Large language models are artificial intelligence systems that can understand and generate human-like text. These models have access to a huge amount of information, which allows them to perform well on tasks that require reasoning and knowledge. However, these models can also pick up on and exhibit societal biases, which can lead to harmful outcomes.

Researchers have proposed many different strategies to try to make these language models safer and less biased. But it's unclear how effective these approaches are at completely eliminating biases.

In this new study, the researchers take a different approach. They create a knowledge graph that captures common stereotypes and biases. Then, they use this knowledge graph to actively try to make the language models produce biased responses, almost like attacking the models.

The researchers found that their attack method was able to increase the level of bias in various language models, even those that had been trained with safety measures in place. This demonstrates that the problem of bias in large language models is still a significant challenge that requires more research and better solutions.

The key takeaway is that while large language models are powerful, we need to be very careful about the biases and societal harms they can perpetuate. More work is needed to ensure these systems are safe and equitable for everyone.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this paper propose a new methodology for attacking large language models (LLMs) by leveraging a knowledge graph of stereotypes. They construct a knowledge graph that captures common natural language stereotypes and then use adversarial attacking strategies to induce biased responses from several open-source and closed-source LLMs.

The researchers find that their attack method is effective at increasing the level of bias exhibited by the tested LLMs, even for those models that have been trained with various safety guardrails in place, as described in related work such as [[https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/causal-explainable-guardrails-large-language-models|Causal and Explainable Guardrails for Large Language Models]].

This demonstrates the significant challenge of eliminating social biases in large language models, as even advanced mitigation techniques may not be sufficient, as explored in [[https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/counter-intuitive-large-language-models-can-better|Counter-Intuitive: Large Language Models Can Better Learn from Fewer Examples]]. The researchers argue that this work highlights the need for further research in AI safety, and the exploration of new adversarial spaces, as proposed in [[https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/rlrfreinforcement-learning-from-reflection-through-debates-as|Reinforcement Learning from Reflection through Debates as a Safety Net for Large Language Models]].

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a compelling demonstration of the difficulties in fully mitigating social biases in large language models. By constructing a knowledge graph of stereotypes and using it to actively induce biased responses, they show that even models with safety measures in place can still be vulnerable to producing harmful outputs.

However, the researchers acknowledge that their attack method is a somewhat narrow approach, focused on exploiting specific stereotypes. It remains to be seen how generalizable their findings are to other types of biases or more nuanced forms of bias. Further research would be needed to assess the broader applicability of this attack strategy.

Additionally, the researchers do not provide a detailed analysis of the specific biases that were amplified through their attacks. A more granular understanding of the nature and origins of these biases could help inform the development of more robust mitigation strategies, as explored in [[https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/evaluating-mitigating-linguistic-discrimination-large-language-models|Evaluating and Mitigating Linguistic Discrimination in Large Language Models]].

Overall, this work highlights the significant challenge of ensuring the safety and fairness of large language models, and the need for continued innovation in the field of AI safety. Developing a comprehensive understanding of the sources and manifestations of bias, and designing effective mitigation strategies, will be crucial for realizing the full potential of these powerful technologies while minimizing their societal harms.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new methodology for attacking large language models by leveraging a knowledge graph of stereotypes. The researchers demonstrate that their approach can induce biased responses from various LLMs, even those that have been trained with safety measures in place.

The key takeaway is that the problem of bias in large language models is still a significant challenge that requires further research and more effective solutions. While many strategies have been proposed to mitigate these issues, this work suggests that more robust and comprehensive approaches are needed to truly eliminate harmful social biases from these powerful AI systems.

As large language models continue to advance and become more ubiquitous, ensuring their safety and fairness will be of paramount importance. The findings of this study underscore the critical need for ongoing innovation and diligence in the field of AI safety, to help realize the transformative potential of these technologies while protecting against their potential for societal harm.