Measuring Dimensions of Self-Presentation in Twitter Bios and their Links to Misinformation Sharing
0
🖼️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Social media platforms allow users to create a short profile description, known as a "bio"
- These bios can provide insights into online self-presentation and behavior
- Existing research has used keyword-based approaches to analyze bios
- This paper proposes and evaluates new methods to embed bios in spaces that capture social meaning
Plain English Explanation
When people create accounts on social media, they often have the option to write a short description about themselves, called a "bio." These bios can reveal a lot about how people present themselves online and how they behave on social media. However, previous research has only used basic keyword-based techniques to analyze these bios.
This paper introduces new, more advanced methods to analyze the text in social media bios. The researchers wanted to create ways to understand the "social meaning" behind how people describe themselves, such as their age, political views, and religiosity. They tested their new techniques on four different tasks to see how well they performed.
The paper then shows how these new bio analysis methods can be used to explore the relationship between how people present themselves online and their tendency to share low-quality news stories on Twitter, particularly looking at the interactions between age and political views, as well as religiosity.
Overall, this research provides new tools for social scientists to better understand the insights that can be gained from analyzing the short profile descriptions that people write about themselves on social media platforms.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a suite of [simple, effective, and theoretically motivated] approaches to embed social media bios in spaces that capture salient dimensions of social meaning, such as age and partisanship. They [evaluate their methods on four tasks], showing that the strongest one outperforms several practical baselines.
The researchers then demonstrate the utility of their method in helping understand associations between self-presentation and the sharing of URLs from low-quality news sites on Twitter. They [explore the interactions between age and partisanship, and the effects of self-presentations of religiosity].
The paper provides new tools to help computational social scientists make use of the information contained in social media bios, and offers new insights into how misinformation sharing may be perceived on Twitter.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution by introducing new, more sophisticated methods for analyzing the text in social media bios beyond simple keyword-based approaches. The [embedding-based] techniques described allow for a richer understanding of the [social meaning] behind how people present themselves online.
However, the paper does not extensively discuss potential limitations or caveats of the research. For example, the analysis is limited to Twitter, and the findings may not generalize to other social media platforms with different user demographics and norms. Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or privacy concerns that could arise from using bio information to make inferences about users.
Further research could explore applying these bio analysis techniques to a wider range of social media platforms and online contexts. It would also be important to consider the ethical implications of using personal information from bios for research purposes, and ensure appropriate safeguards are in place to protect user privacy.
Conclusion
This paper introduces new, [effective methods] for embedding social media bios in spaces that capture important [dimensions of social meaning]. The researchers demonstrate the utility of these techniques by using them to explore the relationship between how people present themselves online and their tendency to share low-quality news on Twitter.
The findings offer [new insights] into the complex interplay between self-presentation, age, political views, and the spread of misinformation. The [new tools] provided by this research can help computational social scientists gain a deeper understanding of online behavior and self-expression.
As social media continues to play a significant role in how people communicate and share information, this work highlights the value of analyzing the rich sources of data available in user-generated content like profile bios. Future research can build on these [advancements] to further explore the [social dynamics] underlying online self-presentation and information sharing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🖼️
0
Measuring Dimensions of Self-Presentation in Twitter Bios and their Links to Misinformation Sharing
Navid Madani, Rabiraj Bandyopadhyay, Briony Swire-Thompson, Michael Miller Yoder, Kenneth Joseph
Social media platforms provide users with a profile description field, commonly known as a ``bio, where they can present themselves to the world. A growing literature shows that text in these bios can improve our understanding of online self-presentation and behavior, but existing work relies exclusively on keyword-based approaches to do so. We here propose and evaluate a suite of hl{simple, effective, and theoretically motivated} approaches to embed bios in spaces that capture salient dimensions of social meaning, such as age and partisanship. We hl{evaluate our methods on four tasks, showing that the strongest one out-performs several practical baselines.} We then show the utility of our method in helping understand associations between self-presentation and the sharing of URLs from low-quality news sites on Twitterhl{, with a particular focus on explore the interactions between age and partisanship, and exploring the effects of self-presentations of religiosity}. Our work provides new tools to help computational social scientists make use of information in bios, and provides new insights into how misinformation sharing may be perceived on Twitter.
Read more9/2/2024
0
Easy-access online social media metrics can effectively identify misinformation sharing users
J'ulia Sz'amely, Alessandro Galeazzi, J'ulia Koltai, Elisa Omodei
Misinformation poses a significant challenge studied extensively by researchers, yet acquiring data to identify primary sharers is costly and challenging. To address this, we propose a low-barrier approach to differentiate social media users who are more likely to share misinformation from those who are less likely. Leveraging insights from previous studies, we demonstrate that easy-access online social network metrics -- average daily tweet count, and account age -- can be leveraged to help identify potential low factuality content spreaders on X (previously known as Twitter). We find that higher tweet frequency is positively associated with low factuality in shared content, while account age is negatively associated with it. We also find that some of the effects, namely the effect of the number of accounts followed and the number of tweets produced, differ depending on the number of followers a user has. Our findings show that relying on these easy-access social network metrics could serve as a low-barrier approach for initial identification of users who are more likely to spread misinformation, and therefore contribute to combating misinformation effectively on social media platforms.
Read more8/28/2024
🌐
0
Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories
Verena Schoenmueller, Simon J. Blanchard, Gita V. Johar
We propose that social-media users' own post histories are an underused yet valuable resource for studying fake-news sharing. By extracting textual cues from their prior posts, and contrasting their prevalence against random social-media users and others (e.g., those with similar socio-demographics, political news-sharers, and fact-check sharers), researchers can identify cues that distinguish fake-news sharers, predict those most likely to share fake news, and identify promising constructs to build interventions. Our research includes studies along these lines. In Study 1, we explore the distinctive language patterns of fake-news sharers, highlighting elements such as their higher use of anger and power-related words. In Study 2, we show that adding textual cues into predictive models enhances their accuracy in predicting fake-news sharers. In Study 3, we explore the contrasting role of trait and situational anger, and show trait anger is associated with a greater propensity to share both true and fake news. In Study 4, we introduce a way to authenticate Twitter accounts in surveys, before using it to explore how crafting an ad copy that resonates with users' sense of power encourages the adoption of fact-checking tools. We hope to encourage the use of novel research methods for marketers and misinformation researchers.
Read more7/23/2024
1
Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users
Mohammed Shahid Modi, James Flamino, Boleslaw K. Szymanski
Humanity for centuries has perfected skills of interpersonal interactions and evolved patterns that enable people to detect lies and deceiving behavior of others in face-to-face settings. Unprecedented growth of people's access to mobile phones and social media raises an important question: How does this new technology influence people's interactions and support the use of traditional patterns? In this article, we answer this question for homophily-driven patterns in social media. In our previous studies, we found that, on a university campus, changes in student opinions were driven by the desire to hold popular opinions. Here, we demonstrate that the evolution of online platform-wide opinion groups is driven by the same desire. We focus on two social media: Twitter and Parler, on which we tracked the political biases of their users. On Parler, an initially stable group of Right-biased users evolved into a permanent Right-leaning echo chamber dominating weaker, transient groups of members with opposing political biases. In contrast, on Twitter, the initial presence of two large opposing bias groups led to the evolution of a bimodal bias distribution, with a high degree of polarization. We capture the movement of users from the initial to final bias groups during the tracking period. We also show that user choices are influenced by side-effects of homophily. Users entering the platform attempt to find a sufficiently large group whose members hold political biases within the range sufficiently close to their own. If successful, they stabilize their biases and become permanent members of the group. Otherwise, they leave the platform. We believe that the dynamics of users' behavior uncovered in this article create a foundation for technical solutions supporting social groups on social media and socially aware networks.
Read more7/23/2024