Measuring Recency Bias In Sequential Recommendation Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines the issue of recency bias in sequential recommendation systems.
- It proposes a method to measure the degree of recency bias and explores its impacts on recommendation performance.
- The study provides insights into how to mitigate recency bias and improve the quality of sequential recommendations.
Plain English Explanation
Recency Bias in Sequential Recommendations
Sequential recommendation systems, such as those used by e-commerce and video streaming platforms, aim to suggest products or content based on a user's recent interactions. However, these systems can suffer from recency bias, where they tend to prioritize the most recent items over older but potentially more relevant ones.
Measuring Recency Bias
The paper introduces a metric called "Recency Discount" (RD) to quantify the degree of recency bias in sequential recommendation systems. RD measures how much the system's recommendations are influenced by the most recent user interactions compared to their overall preferences. By calculating RD, researchers can evaluate the level of recency bias in different recommendation models and identify ways to mitigate it.
Impacts of Recency Bias
The study finds that excessive recency bias can lead to recommendation performance issues, such as recommending outdated content or failing to consider a user's long-term preferences. By understanding the impacts of recency bias, researchers and practitioners can develop more balanced recommendation systems that better serve user needs.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel metric called "Recency Discount" (RD) to quantify the degree of recency bias in sequential recommendation systems. RD measures the difference between a model's recommendations based on a user's full interaction history and its recommendations based solely on the user's most recent interactions.
The researchers conducted experiments on several benchmark datasets and recommendation models to evaluate the impacts of recency bias. They found that excessive recency bias can lead to suboptimal recommendation performance, as the system may fail to consider a user's long-term preferences and instead focus disproportionately on their latest interactions.
The paper also explores strategies to mitigate recency bias, such as incorporating user-specific discount factors or using causal reasoning to better capture long-term dependencies in user behavior. By understanding and addressing recency bias, the authors suggest that recommendation systems can be improved to provide more relevant and personalized suggestions to users.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a robust methodology for measuring recency bias in sequential recommendation systems, which is a valuable contribution to the field. The proposed Recency Discount (RD) metric offers a quantitative way to assess the degree of recency bias and its impacts on recommendation performance.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential causes of recency bias, such as the underlying algorithms or data characteristics that may lead to this phenomenon. Further research could explore the specific system design choices or user behavior patterns that exacerbate recency bias, which could inform more targeted mitigation strategies.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the impacts of recency bias on recommendation performance, but it does not address potential user-facing implications, such as how recency-biased recommendations may influence user satisfaction or trust in the system. Exploring the user experience effects of recency bias could provide additional insights for developing more user-centric recommendation systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to quantifying and understanding recency bias in sequential recommendation systems. By introducing the Recency Discount (RD) metric and exploring its impacts on recommendation performance, the authors provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to develop more balanced and effective recommendation models.
The findings highlight the importance of considering long-term user preferences and causal relationships in sequential recommendations, rather than solely focusing on recent interactions. By addressing recency bias, recommendation systems can better serve user needs and deliver more relevant and personalized suggestions over time.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!Measuring Recency Bias In Sequential Recommendation Systems
Jeonglyul Oh, Sungzoon Cho
Recency bias in a sequential recommendation system refers to the overly high emphasis placed on recent items within a user session. This bias can diminish the serendipity of recommendations and hinder the system's ability to capture users' long-term interests, leading to user disengagement. We propose a simple yet effective novel metric specifically designed to quantify recency bias. Our findings also demonstrate that high recency bias measured in our proposed metric adversely impacts recommendation performance too, and mitigating it results in improved recommendation performances across all models evaluated in our experiments, thus highlighting the importance of measuring recency bias.
Read more9/17/2024
0
CSRec: Rethinking Sequential Recommendation from A Causal Perspective
Xiaoyu Liu, Jiaxin Yuan, Yuhang Zhou, Jingling Li, Furong Huang, Wei Ai
The essence of sequential recommender systems (RecSys) lies in understanding how users make decisions. Most existing approaches frame the task as sequential prediction based on users' historical purchase records. While effective in capturing users' natural preferences, this formulation falls short in accurately modeling actual recommendation scenarios, particularly in accounting for how unsuccessful recommendations influence future purchases. Furthermore, the impact of the RecSys itself on users' decisions has not been appropriately isolated and quantitatively analyzed. To address these challenges, we propose a novel formulation of sequential recommendation, termed Causal Sequential Recommendation (CSRec). Instead of predicting the next item in the sequence, CSRec aims to predict the probability of a recommended item's acceptance within a sequential context and backtrack how current decisions are made. Critically, CSRec facilitates the isolation of various factors that affect users' final decisions, especially the influence of the recommender system itself, thereby opening new avenues for the design of recommender systems. CSRec can be seamlessly integrated into existing methodologies. Experimental evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed implementation significantly improves upon state-of-the-art baselines.
Read more9/11/2024
0
Not All Videos Become Outdated: Short-Video Recommendation by Learning to Deconfound Release Interval Bias
Lulu Dong, Guoxiu He, Aixin Sun
Short-video recommender systems often exhibit a biased preference to recently released videos. However, not all videos become outdated; certain classic videos can still attract user's attention. Such bias along temporal dimension can be further aggravated by the matching model between users and videos, because the model learns from preexisting interactions. From real data, we observe that different videos have varying sensitivities to recency in attracting users' attention. Our analysis, based on a causal graph modeling short-video recommendation, suggests that the release interval serves as a confounder, establishing a backdoor path between users and videos. To address this confounding effect, we propose a model-agnostic causal architecture called Learning to Deconfound the Release Interval Bias (LDRI). LDRI enables jointly learning of the matching model and the video recency sensitivity perceptron. In the inference stage, we apply a backdoor adjustment, effectively blocking the backdoor path by intervening on each video. Extensive experiments on two benchmarks demonstrate that LDRI consistently outperforms backbone models and exhibits superior performance against state-of-the-art models. Additional comprehensive analyses confirm the deconfounding capability of LDRI.
Read more9/2/2024
0
Understanding Biases in ChatGPT-based Recommender Systems: Provider Fairness, Temporal Stability, and Recency
Yashar Deldjoo
This paper explores the biases in ChatGPT-based recommender systems, focusing on provider fairness (item-side fairness). Through extensive experiments and over a thousand API calls, we investigate the impact of prompt design strategies-including structure, system role, and intent-on evaluation metrics such as provider fairness, catalog coverage, temporal stability, and recency. The first experiment examines these strategies in classical top-K recommendations, while the second evaluates sequential in-context learning (ICL). In the first experiment, we assess seven distinct prompt scenarios on top-K recommendation accuracy and fairness. Accuracy-oriented prompts, like Simple and Chain-of-Thought (COT), outperform diversification prompts, which, despite enhancing temporal freshness, reduce accuracy by up to 50%. Embedding fairness into system roles, such as act as a fair recommender, proved more effective than fairness directives within prompts. Diversification prompts led to recommending newer movies, offering broader genre distribution compared to traditional collaborative filtering (CF) models. The second experiment explores sequential ICL, comparing zero-shot and few-shot ICL. Results indicate that including user demographic information in prompts affects model biases and stereotypes. However, ICL did not consistently improve item fairness and catalog coverage over zero-shot learning. Zero-shot learning achieved higher NDCG and coverage, while ICL-2 showed slight improvements in hit rate (HR) when age-group context was included. Our study provides insights into biases of RecLLMs, particularly in provider fairness and catalog coverage. By examining prompt design, learning strategies, and system roles, we highlight the potential and challenges of integrating LLMs into recommendation systems. Further details can be found at https://github.com/yasdel/Benchmark_RecLLM_Fairness.
Read more7/8/2024