Mechanistic interpretability of large language models with applications to the financial services industry

Read original: arXiv:2407.11215 - Published 7/17/2024 by Ashkan Golgoon, Khashayar Filom, Arjun Ravi Kannan
Total Score

0

Mechanistic interpretability of large language models with applications to the financial services industry

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores the mechanistic interpretability of large language models (LLMs) and their applications in the financial services industry
  • Focuses on understanding the inner workings of transformer-based LLMs, which are widely used in various domains
  • Aims to provide insights into how these complex models make predictions, with potential implications for AI safety and model transparency

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are a type of artificial intelligence that can understand and generate human-like text. These models, such as GPT-3, have become increasingly powerful and are used in various applications, including the financial services industry. However, it can be challenging to understand how these complex models make their predictions, which is important for ensuring their safety and reliability.

This research paper explores the "mechanistic interpretability" of LLMs, which means trying to understand the inner workings of these models and how they arrive at their outputs. The researchers focus on transformer-based LLMs, a popular architecture that has become widely used in recent years. By studying the mechanisms behind these models, the researchers hope to provide insights that can be applied to improve the transparency and safety of LLMs in the financial services industry and beyond.

The paper delves into the technical details of how transformer-based LLMs work, including the key components of the architecture and the training process. The researchers also discuss how GPT-2 predicts acronyms and how to extract compact proofs of model performance – both of which are important for understanding the inner workings of these models.

Overall, the goal of this research is to uncover how large language models work and to explore the mechanistic interpretability of these models in order to improve their safety, transparency, and applicability in the financial services industry and other domains.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on the mechanistic interpretability of transformer-based large language models (LLMs), which are a type of neural network architecture that has become widely used in natural language processing tasks. Transformers are known for their ability to capture long-range dependencies in text and have demonstrated impressive performance on a variety of language-related benchmarks.

The researchers provide a detailed overview of the transformer architecture, including its key components such as the attention mechanism, feed-forward networks, and skip connections. They discuss how these elements work together to enable transformers to process and generate human-like text.

One of the key insights explored in the paper is how GPT-2 predicts acronyms, which is an important capability for many real-world applications. The researchers analyze the model's behavior and provide explanations for how it is able to accurately predict and expand acronyms.

The paper also presents a method for extracting compact proofs of model performance, which can help researchers and practitioners better understand the inner workings of these complex models. This is important for improving the transparency and reliability of LLMs, especially in safety-critical domains like finance.

Overall, the research aims to uncover how large language models work and to explore the mechanistic interpretability of these models in order to advance the state of the art in AI safety and model transparency.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have made a commendable effort to explore the mechanistic interpretability of transformer-based LLMs, which is a crucial area of research for ensuring the safety and reliability of these powerful models, especially in the financial services industry.

One potential limitation of the study is the focus on a single type of LLM architecture (transformers) and the specific abilities like acronym prediction. While these insights are valuable, the researchers could have expanded the scope to consider other LLM architectures or a broader range of capabilities to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the field.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential ethical considerations and societal implications of increased transparency and interpretability of LLMs. As these models become more widely deployed, it will be important to consider how improved mechanistic interpretability can be leveraged to address concerns around bias, fairness, and accountability.

Further research could also explore the practical applications of the insights gained from this study, such as how the understanding of LLM mechanisms can be applied to improve model development, monitoring, and deployment processes in the financial services industry and beyond.

Conclusion

This research paper represents an important step towards uncovering how large language models work and exploring the mechanistic interpretability of transformer-based language models. By providing insights into the inner workings of these complex models, the researchers have laid the groundwork for improving the safety, transparency, and reliability of LLMs in the financial services industry and beyond.

The findings regarding how GPT-2 predicts acronyms and the extraction of compact proofs of model performance are particularly valuable, as they offer concrete examples of how the mechanistic interpretability of LLMs can be applied in practical settings.

As the use of LLMs continues to grow, the insights and methodologies presented in this paper will become increasingly important for ensuring the safety, transparency, and responsible deployment of these powerful AI systems. Further research and collaboration between academia, industry, and policymakers will be crucial for realizing the full potential of LLMs while mitigating the associated risks and challenges.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Mechanistic interpretability of large language models with applications to the financial services industry
Total Score

0

Mechanistic interpretability of large language models with applications to the financial services industry

Ashkan Golgoon, Khashayar Filom, Arjun Ravi Kannan

Large Language Models such as GPTs (Generative Pre-trained Transformers) exhibit remarkable capabilities across a broad spectrum of applications. Nevertheless, due to their intrinsic complexity, these models present substantial challenges in interpreting their internal decision-making processes. This lack of transparency poses critical challenges when it comes to their adaptation by financial institutions, where concerns and accountability regarding bias, fairness, and reliability are of paramount importance. Mechanistic interpretability aims at reverse engineering complex AI models such as transformers. In this paper, we are pioneering the use of mechanistic interpretability to shed some light on the inner workings of large language models for use in financial services applications. We offer several examples of how algorithmic tasks can be designed for compliance monitoring purposes. In particular, we investigate GPT-2 Small's attention pattern when prompted to identify potential violation of Fair Lending laws. Using direct logit attribution, we study the contributions of each layer and its corresponding attention heads to the logit difference in the residual stream. Finally, we design clean and corrupted prompts and use activation patching as a causal intervention method to localize our task completion components further. We observe that the (positive) heads $10.2$ (head $2$, layer $10$), $10.7$, and $11.3$, as well as the (negative) heads $9.6$ and $10.6$ play a significant role in the task completion.

Read more

7/17/2024

A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Models
Total Score

1

A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Models

Daking Rai, Yilun Zhou, Shi Feng, Abulhair Saparov, Ziyu Yao

Mechanistic interpretability (MI) is an emerging sub-field of interpretability that seeks to understand a neural network model by reverse-engineering its internal computations. Recently, MI has garnered significant attention for interpreting transformer-based language models (LMs), resulting in many novel insights yet introducing new challenges. However, there has not been work that comprehensively reviews these insights and challenges, particularly as a guide for newcomers to this field. To fill this gap, we present a comprehensive survey outlining fundamental objects of study in MI, techniques that have been used for its investigation, approaches for evaluating MI results, and significant findings and applications stemming from the use of MI to understand LMs. In particular, we present a roadmap for beginners to navigate the field and leverage MI for their benefit. Finally, we also identify current gaps in the field and discuss potential future directions.

Read more

7/4/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Provable Guarantees for Model Performance via Mechanistic Interpretability

Jason Gross, Rajashree Agrawal, Thomas Kwa, Euan Ong, Chun Hei Yip, Alex Gibson, Soufiane Noubir, Lawrence Chan

In this work, we propose using mechanistic interpretability -- techniques for reverse engineering model weights into human-interpretable algorithms -- to derive and compactly prove formal guarantees on model performance. We prototype this approach by formally proving lower bounds on the accuracy of 151 small transformers trained on a Max-of-$K$ task. We create 102 different computer-assisted proof strategies and assess their length and tightness of bound on each of our models. Using quantitative metrics, we find that shorter proofs seem to require and provide more mechanistic understanding. Moreover, we find that more faithful mechanistic understanding leads to tighter performance bounds. We confirm these connections by qualitatively examining a subset of our proofs. Finally, we identify compounding structureless noise as a key challenge for using mechanistic interpretability to generate compact proofs on model performance.

Read more

6/26/2024

How does GPT-2 Predict Acronyms? Extracting and Understanding a Circuit via Mechanistic Interpretability
Total Score

0

How does GPT-2 Predict Acronyms? Extracting and Understanding a Circuit via Mechanistic Interpretability

Jorge Garc'ia-Carrasco, Alejandro Mat'e, Juan Trujillo

Transformer-based language models are treated as black-boxes because of their large number of parameters and complex internal interactions, which is a serious safety concern. Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) intends to reverse-engineer neural network behaviors in terms of human-understandable components. In this work, we focus on understanding how GPT-2 Small performs the task of predicting three-letter acronyms. Previous works in the MI field have focused so far on tasks that predict a single token. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that tries to mechanistically understand a behavior involving the prediction of multiple consecutive tokens. We discover that the prediction is performed by a circuit composed of 8 attention heads (~5% of the total heads) which we classified in three groups according to their role. We also demonstrate that these heads concentrate the acronym prediction functionality. In addition, we mechanistically interpret the most relevant heads of the circuit and find out that they use positional information which is propagated via the causal mask mechanism. We expect this work to lay the foundation for understanding more complex behaviors involving multiple-token predictions.

Read more

5/8/2024