Towards Uncovering How Large Language Model Works: An Explainability Perspective
2402.10688
0
0
💬
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have led to breakthroughs in language tasks, yet the internal mechanisms that enable their remarkable generalization and reasoning abilities remain opaque. This lack of transparency presents challenges such as hallucinations, toxicity, and misalignment with human values, hindering the safe and beneficial deployment of LLMs. This paper aims to uncover the mechanisms underlying LLM functionality through the lens of explainability. First, we review how knowledge is architecturally composed within LLMs and encoded in their internal parameters via mechanistic interpretability techniques. Then, we summarize how knowledge is embedded in LLM representations by leveraging probing techniques and representation engineering. Additionally, we investigate the training dynamics through a mechanistic perspective to explain phenomena such as grokking and memorization. Lastly, we explore how the insights gained from these explanations can enhance LLM performance through model editing, improve efficiency through pruning, and better align with human values.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable successes in language tasks, but their inner workings are not well understood.
- This lack of transparency can lead to issues like hallucinations, toxicity, and misalignment with human values, which hinders the safe and beneficial deployment of LLMs.
- The paper aims to uncover the mechanisms underlying LLM functionality through the lens of explainability.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are artificial intelligence systems that are remarkably good at understanding and generating human language. They have achieved impressive results in tasks like translation, question answering, and text generation. However, the inner workings of these models are not entirely clear.
This opacity can lead to problems like the models producing nonsensical or harmful text (hallucinations), generating biased or offensive language (toxicity), and not aligning well with human values and ethics. These issues make it challenging to deploy LLMs in a safe and beneficial way.
The research paper aims to shed light on how LLMs work under the hood. By studying the models' internal mechanisms and representations, the researchers hope to improve our understanding of these powerful language systems and address the challenges that come with their use.
Technical Explanation
The paper takes several approaches to uncover the inner workings of LLMs:
-
It examines how knowledge is architecturally composed within the models and encoded in their internal parameters, using mechanistic interpretability techniques.
-
It summarizes how knowledge is embedded in the models' representations by leveraging probing techniques and representation engineering.
-
It investigates the training dynamics of LLMs from a mechanistic perspective to explain phenomena like grokking and memorization.
-
It explores how the insights gained from these explanations can be used to enhance LLM performance through model editing, improve efficiency through pruning, and better align the models with human values and reasoning behavior.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of several techniques for uncovering the inner workings of LLMs, which is crucial for addressing the challenges of transparency and alignment. However, the authors acknowledge that their findings are limited to the specific models and tasks studied, and further research is needed to generalize the insights to a broader range of LLMs and applications.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential societal implications of these findings, such as the risks of using explainable LLMs for high-stakes decision-making or the ethical considerations around model editing and pruning. These are important areas for further exploration and discussion.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of LLM interpretability and reasoning, providing a solid foundation for future research and development in this crucial area.
Conclusion
This research paper takes an important step towards unveiling the inner workings of large language models, which are becoming increasingly powerful and influential in our lives. By leveraging various interpretability techniques, the authors shed light on how these models compose and encode knowledge, as well as the dynamics of their training process.
The insights gained from this research can be used to enhance the performance, efficiency, and alignment of LLMs, helping to address the challenges of hallucinations, toxicity, and value misalignment. While further work is needed to generalize the findings and explore the broader implications, this paper represents a significant advance in our understanding of these complex and influential AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
A Philosophical Introduction to Language Models - Part II: The Way Forward
Raphael Milli`ere, Cameron Buckner
0
0
In this paper, the second of two companion pieces, we explore novel philosophical questions raised by recent progress in large language models (LLMs) that go beyond the classical debates covered in the first part. We focus particularly on issues related to interpretability, examining evidence from causal intervention methods about the nature of LLMs' internal representations and computations. We also discuss the implications of multimodal and modular extensions of LLMs, recent debates about whether such systems may meet minimal criteria for consciousness, and concerns about secrecy and reproducibility in LLM research. Finally, we discuss whether LLM-like systems may be relevant to modeling aspects of human cognition, if their architectural characteristics and learning scenario are adequately constrained.
5/7/2024
💬
Exploring the landscape of large language models: Foundations, techniques, and challenges
Milad Moradi, Ke Yan, David Colwell, Matthias Samwald, Rhona Asgari
0
0
In this review paper, we delve into the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), covering their foundational principles, diverse applications, and nuanced training processes. The article sheds light on the mechanics of in-context learning and a spectrum of fine-tuning approaches, with a special focus on methods that optimize efficiency in parameter usage. Additionally, it explores how LLMs can be more closely aligned with human preferences through innovative reinforcement learning frameworks and other novel methods that incorporate human feedback. The article also examines the emerging technique of retrieval augmented generation, integrating external knowledge into LLMs. The ethical dimensions of LLM deployment are discussed, underscoring the need for mindful and responsible application. Concluding with a perspective on future research trajectories, this review offers a succinct yet comprehensive overview of the current state and emerging trends in the evolving landscape of LLMs, serving as an insightful guide for both researchers and practitioners in artificial intelligence.
4/19/2024
🔄
LLMs for XAI: Future Directions for Explaining Explanations
Alexandra Zytek, Sara Pid`o, Kalyan Veeramachaneni
0
0
In response to the demand for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), we investigate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to transform ML explanations into natural, human-readable narratives. Rather than directly explaining ML models using LLMs, we focus on refining explanations computed using existing XAI algorithms. We outline several research directions, including defining evaluation metrics, prompt design, comparing LLM models, exploring further training methods, and integrating external data. Initial experiments and user study suggest that LLMs offer a promising way to enhance the interpretability and usability of XAI.
5/13/2024
💬
Reinterpreting 'the Company a Word Keeps': Towards Explainable and Ontologically Grounded Language Models
Walid S. Saba
0
0
We argue that the relative success of large language models (LLMs) is not a reflection on the symbolic vs. subsymbolic debate but a reflection on employing a successful bottom-up strategy of a reverse engineering of language at scale. However, and due to their subsymbolic nature whatever knowledge these systems acquire about language will always be buried in millions of weights none of which is meaningful on its own, rendering such systems utterly unexplainable. Furthermore, and due to their stochastic nature, LLMs will often fail in making the correct inferences in various linguistic contexts that require reasoning in intensional, temporal, or modal contexts. To remedy these shortcomings we suggest employing the same successful bottom-up strategy employed in LLMs but in a symbolic setting, resulting in explainable, language-agnostic, and ontologically grounded language models.
6/12/2024