Medical Dialogue: A Survey of Categories, Methods, Evaluation and Challenges
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the field of medical dialogue systems, which are AI-powered conversational interfaces designed to assist in healthcare-related tasks.
• The authors categorize existing medical dialogue systems, review the various methods and approaches used to build them, discuss evaluation techniques, and highlight key challenges and research directions in this domain.
• The survey covers a wide range of medical dialogue applications, including disease diagnosis, prescription refill assistance, mental health support, and chronic disease management.
Plain English Explanation
Medical dialogue systems are a type of AI technology that can have conversations with people to help with healthcare-related tasks. This paper looks at the different kinds of medical dialogue systems, the various ways they are built, how they are evaluated, and the main challenges and future directions in this field.
These systems can be used for things like diagnosing illnesses, helping with medication refills, providing mental health support, and managing chronic diseases. The paper categorizes the different types of medical dialogue systems, explains the various techniques and methods used to create them, discusses how researchers measure the performance of these systems, and highlights the key problems and future research areas in this domain.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the field of medical dialogue systems, which leverage natural language processing and conversational AI to assist with healthcare-related tasks. The authors then provide a taxonomy of existing medical dialogue systems, categorizing them based on factors such as the target use case (e.g., disease diagnosis, chronic disease management), the conversational modality (e.g., text, speech), and the underlying technology (e.g., rule-based, machine learning-based).
The survey then delves into the different methodologies employed to build medical dialogue systems, including task-oriented dialogue approaches, large language models fine-tuned for medical domains, and hybrid systems that combine multiple techniques. The authors also discuss evaluation metrics and benchmarks used to assess the performance of these systems, such as task completion rates, user satisfaction, and clinical accuracy.
Finally, the paper outlines key challenges and future research directions in the field of medical dialogue systems, including handling complex medical knowledge, ensuring safety and ethical considerations, and multimodal interaction (e.g., combining language with images or sensor data).
Critical Analysis
The survey provides a thorough and well-structured overview of the medical dialogue system landscape, highlighting the diverse range of applications and the various technical approaches used to address them. The authors do a commendable job of identifying the key evaluation metrics and challenges in this domain, which will be valuable for guiding future research efforts.
One potential limitation of the paper is the lack of a deeper critical analysis of the current state of the field. While the authors acknowledge some of the challenges, such as ensuring safety and ethical considerations, they could have delved further into the limitations and potential pitfalls of existing medical dialogue systems. For example, the paper does not address issues related to bias, fairness, and interpretability, which are crucial concerns when deploying AI-powered healthcare applications.
Additionally, the survey could have benefited from a more comparative analysis, where the authors explicitly compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of different technical approaches (e.g., rule-based vs. machine learning-based systems) or evaluate the tradeoffs between various evaluation metrics.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey of medical dialogue systems provides a valuable and timely overview of the field, covering the key categories, methods, evaluation techniques, and research challenges. The paper serves as a useful reference for researchers and practitioners working in this domain, highlighting the significant progress made in leveraging conversational AI for healthcare applications while also identifying important areas for future exploration and improvement.
As the use of medical dialogue systems continues to grow, it will be crucial for the research community to address the critical issues raised in this survey, such as ensuring the safety, fairness, and ethical deployment of these technologies. By continuing to advance the state of the art in medical dialogue systems, the field has the potential to significantly improve healthcare outcomes and transform the way patients interact with the medical system.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Medical Dialogue: A Survey of Categories, Methods, Evaluation and Challenges
Xiaoming Shi, Zeming Liu, Li Du, Yuxuan Wang, Hongru Wang, Yuhang Guo, Tong Ruan, Jie Xu, Shaoting Zhang
This paper surveys and organizes research works on medical dialog systems, which is an important yet challenging task. Although these systems have been surveyed in the medical community from an application perspective, a systematic review from a rigorous technical perspective has to date remained noticeably absent. As a result, an overview of the categories, methods, and evaluation of medical dialogue systems remain limited and underspecified, hindering the further improvement of this area. To fill this gap, we investigate an initial pool of 325 papers from well-known computer science, and natural language processing conferences and journals, and make an overview. Recently, large language models have shown strong model capacity on downstream tasks, which also reshaped medical dialog systems' foundation. Despite the alluring practical application value, current medical dialogue systems still suffer from problems. To this end, this paper lists the grand challenges of medical dialog systems, especially of large language models.
Read more5/20/2024
💬
0
A Survey of Large Language Models in Medicine: Progress, Application, and Challenge
Hongjian Zhou, Fenglin Liu, Boyang Gu, Xinyu Zou, Jinfa Huang, Jinge Wu, Yiru Li, Sam S. Chen, Peilin Zhou, Junling Liu, Yining Hua, Chengfeng Mao, Chenyu You, Xian Wu, Yefeng Zheng, Lei Clifton, Zheng Li, Jiebo Luo, David A. Clifton
Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have received substantial attention due to their capabilities for understanding and generating human language. While there has been a burgeoning trend in research focusing on the employment of LLMs in supporting different medical tasks (e.g., enhancing clinical diagnostics and providing medical education), a review of these efforts, particularly their development, practical applications, and outcomes in medicine, remains scarce. Therefore, this review aims to provide a detailed overview of the development and deployment of LLMs in medicine, including the challenges and opportunities they face. In terms of development, we provide a detailed introduction to the principles of existing medical LLMs, including their basic model structures, number of parameters, and sources and scales of data used for model development. It serves as a guide for practitioners in developing medical LLMs tailored to their specific needs. In terms of deployment, we offer a comparison of the performance of different LLMs across various medical tasks, and further compare them with state-of-the-art lightweight models, aiming to provide an understanding of the advantages and limitations of LLMs in medicine. Overall, in this review, we address the following questions: 1) What are the practices for developing medical LLMs 2) How to measure the medical task performance of LLMs in a medical setting? 3) How have medical LLMs been employed in real-world practice? 4) What challenges arise from the use of medical LLMs? and 5) How to more effectively develop and deploy medical LLMs? By answering these questions, this review aims to provide insights into the opportunities for LLMs in medicine and serve as a practical resource. We also maintain a regularly updated list of practical guides on medical LLMs at: https://github.com/AI-in-Health/MedLLMsPracticalGuide.
Read more5/16/2024
0
A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations
Jinqiang Wang, Huansheng Ning, Yi Peng, Qikai Wei, Daniel Tesfai, Wenwei Mao, Tao Zhu, Runhe Huang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated surprising performance across various natural language processing tasks. Recently, medical LLMs enhanced with domain-specific knowledge have exhibited excellent capabilities in medical consultation and diagnosis. These models can smoothly simulate doctor-patient dialogues and provide professional medical advice. Most medical LLMs are developed through continued training of open-source general LLMs, which require significantly fewer computational resources than training LLMs from scratch. Additionally, this approach offers better protection of patient privacy compared to API-based solutions. This survey systematically explores how to train medical LLMs based on general LLMs. It covers: (a) how to acquire training corpus and construct customized medical training sets, (b) how to choose a appropriate training paradigm, (c) how to choose a suitable evaluation benchmark, and (d) existing challenges and promising future research directions are discussed. This survey can provide guidance for the development of LLMs focused on various medical applications, such as medical education, diagnostic planning, and clinical assistants.
Read more6/18/2024
💬
0
Evaluating large language models in medical applications: a survey
Xiaolan Chen, Jiayang Xiang, Shanfu Lu, Yexin Liu, Mingguang He, Danli Shi
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools with transformative potential across numerous domains, including healthcare and medicine. In the medical domain, LLMs hold promise for tasks ranging from clinical decision support to patient education. However, evaluating the performance of LLMs in medical contexts presents unique challenges due to the complex and critical nature of medical information. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the landscape of medical LLM evaluation, synthesizing insights from existing studies and highlighting evaluation data sources, task scenarios, and evaluation methods. Additionally, it identifies key challenges and opportunities in medical LLM evaluation, emphasizing the need for continued research and innovation to ensure the responsible integration of LLMs into clinical practice.
Read more5/14/2024