Conversational Disease Diagnosis via External Planner-Controlled Large Language Models
2404.04292
0
0
Abstract
The development of large language models (LLMs) has brought unprecedented possibilities for artificial intelligence (AI) based medical diagnosis. However, the application perspective of LLMs in real diagnostic scenarios is still unclear because they are not adept at collecting patient data proactively. This study presents a LLM-based diagnostic system that enhances planning capabilities by emulating doctors. Our system involves two external planners to handle planning tasks. The first planner employs a reinforcement learning approach to formulate disease screening questions and conduct initial diagnoses. The second planner uses LLMs to parse medical guidelines and conduct differential diagnoses. By utilizing real patient electronic medical record data, we constructed simulated dialogues between virtual patients and doctors and evaluated the diagnostic abilities of our system. We demonstrated that our system obtained impressive performance in both disease screening and differential diagnoses tasks. This research represents a step towards more seamlessly integrating AI into clinical settings, potentially enhancing the accuracy and accessibility of medical diagnostics.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) in conversational disease diagnosis, where an external planner is used to control the LLM's behavior.
- The researchers developed a system that combines an LLM with a planning module to engage in structured medical dialogues, aiming to accurately diagnose diseases based on patient symptoms.
- The system was evaluated on a dataset of simulated medical consultations, and the results suggest that the external planner-controlled LLM approach can outperform traditional LLM-based medical consultation systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to use large language models (LLMs) - advanced AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text - to help diagnose diseases. The researchers created a system that combines an LLM with a separate "planning" module that helps guide the LLM's responses during a conversation.
The idea is that the planning module can structure the conversation in a more organized and effective way, leading to more accurate disease diagnoses compared to using an LLM alone. The system was tested on simulated medical consultations, and the results suggest that this approach can outperform traditional LLM-based medical consultation systems.
This research builds on previous work exploring the use of LLMs for medical applications, such as large-language-model-based-situational-dialogues-second, autonomous-artificial-intelligence-agents-clinical-decision-making, and evaluating-interventional-reasoning-capabilities-large-language-models. By adding a planning module to guide the LLM's responses, the researchers aim to create a more structured and effective medical dialogue system.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the use of an external planner to control the behavior of the large language model (LLM) during conversational disease diagnosis. The researchers developed a system that combines an LLM with a planning module, where the planner is responsible for structuring the dialogue and guiding the LLM's responses.
The planning module uses a knowledge base of medical information and a set of dialogue policies to determine the optimal sequence of questions and responses for accurately diagnosing a patient's condition. This allows the system to engage in a more organized and targeted dialogue, in contrast to a traditional LLM-based system that may generate more open-ended and less focused responses.
The system was evaluated on a dataset of simulated medical consultations, where the LLM-based system with the external planner was compared to a traditional LLM-based system without the planner. The results showed that the external planner-controlled LLM approach was able to achieve higher accuracy in disease diagnosis, as well as more efficient and coherent dialogues.
This research builds on recent work exploring the use of LLMs for medical applications, such as can-llms-correct-physicians-yet-investigating-effective and exploring-autonomous-agents-through-lens-large-language. By incorporating a planning module to guide the LLM's responses, the researchers aim to create a more structured and effective medical dialogue system that can accurately diagnose diseases based on patient symptoms.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to using large language models (LLMs) for conversational disease diagnosis, but it also has some potential limitations and areas for further research.
One potential concern is the reliance on a simulated dataset of medical consultations, which may not fully capture the complexity and nuance of real-world medical interactions. It would be valuable to evaluate the system's performance on a more diverse and realistic dataset, including interactions with actual patients and healthcare providers.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues around the transparency and interpretability of the system's decision-making process. As an AI-based system, there may be concerns about the "black box" nature of the LLM's reasoning, which could make it difficult for healthcare professionals to understand and trust the system's diagnoses.
Further research could also explore ways to incorporate more advanced reasoning and decision-making capabilities into the system, such as the use of autonomous-artificial-intelligence-agents-clinical-decision-making or evaluating-interventional-reasoning-capabilities-large-language-models. This could help the system engage in more nuanced and context-aware medical dialogues, leading to even more accurate and reliable diagnoses.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to using large language models (LLMs) for conversational disease diagnosis, where an external planner is used to control the LLM's behavior and structure the dialogue. The results suggest that this approach can outperform traditional LLM-based medical consultation systems, potentially leading to more accurate and efficient disease diagnoses.
While the paper provides a promising initial demonstration of this technology, there are still important areas for further research and development, such as testing the system on more realistic datasets, addressing transparency and interpretability concerns, and exploring more advanced reasoning and decision-making capabilities. Overall, this work represents an exciting step forward in the application of LLMs to the field of healthcare and medical diagnosis.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy through Multi-Agent Conversations: Using Large Language Models to Mitigate Cognitive Bias
Yu He Ke, Rui Yang, Sui An Lie, Taylor Xin Yi Lim, Hairil Rizal Abdullah, Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Nan Liu
0
0
Background: Cognitive biases in clinical decision-making significantly contribute to errors in diagnosis and suboptimal patient outcomes. Addressing these biases presents a formidable challenge in the medical field. Objective: This study explores the role of large language models (LLMs) in mitigating these biases through the utilization of a multi-agent framework. We simulate the clinical decision-making processes through multi-agent conversation and evaluate its efficacy in improving diagnostic accuracy. Methods: A total of 16 published and unpublished case reports where cognitive biases have resulted in misdiagnoses were identified from the literature. In the multi-agent framework, we leveraged GPT-4 to facilitate interactions among four simulated agents to replicate clinical team dynamics. Each agent has a distinct role: 1) To make the final diagnosis after considering the discussions, 2) The devil's advocate and correct confirmation and anchoring bias, 3) The tutor and facilitator of the discussion to reduce premature closure bias, and 4) To record and summarize the findings. A total of 80 simulations were evaluated for the accuracy of initial diagnosis, top differential diagnosis and final two differential diagnoses. Results: In a total of 80 responses evaluating both initial and final diagnoses, the initial diagnosis had an accuracy of 0% (0/80), but following multi-agent discussions, the accuracy for the top differential diagnosis increased to 71.3% (57/80), and for the final two differential diagnoses, to 80.0% (64/80). Conclusions: The framework demonstrated an ability to re-evaluate and correct misconceptions, even in scenarios with misleading initial investigations. The LLM-driven multi-agent conversation framework shows promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in diagnostically challenging medical scenarios.
5/14/2024
💬
Benchmarking Large Language Models on Communicative Medical Coaching: a Novel System and Dataset
Hengguan Huang, Songtao Wang, Hongfu Liu, Hao Wang, Ye Wang
0
0
Traditional applications of natural language processing (NLP) in healthcare have predominantly focused on patient-centered services, enhancing patient interactions and care delivery, such as through medical dialogue systems. However, the potential of NLP to benefit inexperienced doctors, particularly in areas such as communicative medical coaching, remains largely unexplored. We introduce ChatCoach, a human-AI cooperative framework designed to assist medical learners in practicing their communication skills during patient consultations. ChatCoach (Our data and code are available online: https://github.com/zerowst/Chatcoach)differentiates itself from conventional dialogue systems by offering a simulated environment where medical learners can practice dialogues with a patient agent, while a coach agent provides immediate, structured feedback. This is facilitated by our proposed Generalized Chain-of-Thought (GCoT) approach, which fosters the generation of structured feedback and enhances the utilization of external knowledge sources. Additionally, we have developed a dataset specifically for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) within the ChatCoach framework on communicative medical coaching tasks. Our empirical results validate the effectiveness of ChatCoach.
6/11/2024
Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales
Taeyoon Kwon, Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Dongjin Kang, Seungjun Moon, Jeong Ryong Lee, Dosik Hwang, Yongsik Sim, Beomseok Sohn, Dongha Lee, Jinyoung Yeo
0
0
Machine reasoning has made great progress in recent years owing to large language models (LLMs). In the clinical domain, however, most NLP-driven projects mainly focus on clinical classification or reading comprehension, and under-explore clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis due to the expensive rationale annotation with clinicians. In this work, we present a reasoning-aware diagnosis framework that rationalizes the diagnostic process via prompt-based learning in a time- and labor-efficient manner, and learns to reason over the prompt-generated rationales. Specifically, we address the clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis, where the LLM generates diagnostic rationales providing its insight on presented patient data and the reasoning path towards the diagnosis, namely Clinical Chain-of-Thought (Clinical CoT). We empirically demonstrate LLMs/LMs' ability of clinical reasoning via extensive experiments and analyses on both rationale generation and disease diagnosis in various settings. We further propose a novel set of criteria for evaluating machine-generated rationales' potential for real-world clinical settings, facilitating and benefiting future research in this area.
5/13/2024
A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations
Jinqiang Wang, Huansheng Ning, Yi Peng, Qikai Wei, Daniel Tesfai, Wenwei Mao, Tao Zhu, Runhe Huang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated surprising performance across various natural language processing tasks. Recently, medical LLMs enhanced with domain-specific knowledge have exhibited excellent capabilities in medical consultation and diagnosis. These models can smoothly simulate doctor-patient dialogues and provide professional medical advice. Most medical LLMs are developed through continued training of open-source general LLMs, which require significantly fewer computational resources than training LLMs from scratch. Additionally, this approach offers better protection of patient privacy compared to API-based solutions. This survey systematically explores how to train medical LLMs based on general LLMs. It covers: (a) how to acquire training corpus and construct customized medical training sets, (b) how to choose a appropriate training paradigm, (c) how to choose a suitable evaluation benchmark, and (d) existing challenges and promising future research directions are discussed. This survey can provide guidance for the development of LLMs focused on various medical applications, such as medical education, diagnostic planning, and clinical assistants.
6/18/2024