A Meta-analysis of College Students' Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence

Overview

• This paper explores college students' intention to use generative AI (such as ChatGPT) based on a meta-analysis of previous studies.
• The researchers examined factors that influence students' willingness to use these AI tools, including perceived usefulness, ease of use, ethical concerns, and social influences.
• The findings provide insights into how colleges and universities can effectively integrate generative AI into the curriculum and support students in leveraging these technologies responsibly.

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates why college students are or aren't interested in using generative AI tools like ChatGPT. The researchers looked at data from previous studies to understand the key factors that influence students' willingness to use these AI-powered tools.

Some of the main things that affect students' intentions include:

• Perceived Usefulness: How helpful they think the AI tools will be for their academic work and goals
• Ease of Use: How straightforward and user-friendly the AI tools are to incorporate into their studies
• Ethical Concerns: Any worries students have about the ethical implications of using AI, such as issues around academic integrity
• Social Influences: The opinions and behaviors of their peers, professors, and others in their academic community

The findings can help colleges and universities better support students in responsibly leveraging these powerful AI technologies as part of their education.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a meta-analysis, synthesizing the results of 47 previous studies on college students' intentions to use generative AI. They examined how various factors, grounded in established technology acceptance frameworks like the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), influence students' willingness to adopt these AI tools.

The meta-analysis revealed that students' perceived usefulness of the AI technologies, as well as their perceptions of the tools' ease of use, had the strongest positive impacts on their intentions to utilize generative AI. Ethical concerns, however, were found to be a significant barrier, negatively affecting students' adoption intentions.

Additionally, the researchers discovered that social influences, such as the opinions and behaviors of peers, professors, and the broader academic community, also played an important role in shaping students' AI usage intentions. The study provides empirical evidence to guide colleges and universities in developing strategies to effectively integrate generative AI into the curriculum while addressing students' ethical reservations.

Critical Analysis

The meta-analysis provides a comprehensive, data-driven perspective on the factors that drive or hinder college students' intentions to use generative AI. However, the research is limited to studies published prior to the recent explosion of large language models like ChatGPT, which may have significantly impacted student perceptions and behaviors.

Furthermore, the meta-analysis focused on general factors influencing AI adoption intentions, but did not delve into the nuances of how students might utilize these tools across different academic disciplines or for specific tasks (e.g., writing assignments, research, coding, etc.). Additional research may be needed to understand the unique challenges and opportunities of integrating generative AI into diverse educational contexts.

It's also worth noting that the study did not explore potential differences in AI adoption intentions based on factors such as students' demographic characteristics, academic performance, or technological proficiency. These individual differences could play a role in how students perceive and engage with generative AI tools.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the key factors that shape college students' intentions to use generative AI technologies. The findings highlight the importance of addressing both the practical and ethical considerations that influence students' willingness to adopt these AI tools.

By understanding the drivers and barriers to AI adoption, colleges and universities can develop more effective strategies to integrate generative AI into the curriculum in a way that maximizes its educational benefits while addressing students' concerns. This research lays the groundwork for continued exploration of how these transformative technologies can be leveraged to enhance the learning experience and prepare students for the future workforce.