Methods for Convex $(L_0,L_1)$-Smooth Optimization: Clipping, Acceleration, and Adaptivity
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes new methods for optimizing convex functions with (L0, L1)-smoothness constraints.
- The methods involve clipping, acceleration, and adaptivity to improve optimization performance.
- The paper analyzes the theoretical properties of the proposed algorithms and demonstrates their effectiveness through experiments.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a specific type of optimization problem, where the objective function has a particular mathematical structure called (L0, L1)-smoothness. This means the function is smooth in certain ways, but not in others.
To solve these types of optimization problems, the researchers developed several new techniques:
- Clipping: This involves limiting the size of the updates made during the optimization process, which can help the algorithm converge more efficiently.
- Acceleration: This refers to techniques that speed up the optimization algorithm, allowing it to reach the solution faster.
- Adaptivity: This means the algorithm adjusts its behavior based on the characteristics of the problem being solved, which can help it perform better.
The paper analyzes these new techniques theoretically, showing that they have desirable mathematical properties. The researchers also demonstrate through experiments that the new methods outperform existing optimization algorithms on a variety of problem instances.
The key idea is to tailor the optimization algorithm to the specific structure of the (L0, L1)-smooth objective function, rather than using a generic optimization method. This specialized approach can lead to significant improvements in optimization performance.
Technical Explanation
The paper considers the problem of minimizing a convex function f(x) that satisfies (L0, L1)-smoothness constraints. This means f(x) has the following properties:
- It is L0-smooth, which implies the gradients of f(x) are Lipschitz continuous.
- It is L1-smooth, which means the gradients of f(x) have bounded variation.
The researchers propose three new optimization methods to solve this problem:
- Clipped Gradient Descent (CGD): This method clips the gradient updates to a fixed maximum size, which can improve convergence rates.
- Accelerated Clipped Gradient Descent (ACGD): This extends CGD by incorporating Nesterov-style acceleration, further speeding up convergence.
- Adaptive Clipped Gradient Descent (ACGD-Adapt): This method adaptively adjusts the clipping threshold based on the problem characteristics, leading to better performance.
The paper provides theoretical analyses of these algorithms, proving that they achieve improved convergence rates compared to standard gradient descent. The researchers also conduct experiments on various optimization problems, demonstrating the practical benefits of their methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes several important contributions to the field of optimization, particularly for problems with (L0, L1)-smooth objective functions. The proposed techniques of clipping, acceleration, and adaptivity are well-motivated and show promising theoretical and empirical results.
However, the paper does not address several potential limitations:
- The analysis and experiments are focused on convex optimization problems. It's unclear how the methods would perform on non-convex problems, which are also of great practical interest.
- The paper does not consider the computational overhead introduced by the clipping and adaptive components of the algorithms. In some cases, this overhead could offset the convergence rate improvements.
- The experiments are limited to relatively small-scale problems. It's important to evaluate the scalability of these methods on larger, more realistic optimization problems.
Further research could explore these areas and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed techniques.
Conclusion
This paper presents novel optimization methods for solving (L0, L1)-smooth convex optimization problems. By incorporating clipping, acceleration, and adaptivity, the researchers have developed algorithms that can outperform standard gradient descent approaches.
The theoretical analyses and empirical evaluations suggest these techniques can be valuable tools for practitioners working on optimization problems with the specific structure considered in this paper. The ideas introduced here may also inspire further research into tailoring optimization algorithms to the characteristics of the objective function, rather than using generic methods.
Overall, this work contributes to the ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency and robustness of optimization algorithms, which are crucial for many applications in machine learning, engineering, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Methods for Convex $(L_0,L_1)$-Smooth Optimization: Clipping, Acceleration, and Adaptivity
Eduard Gorbunov, Nazarii Tupitsa, Sayantan Choudhury, Alen Aliev, Peter Richt'arik, Samuel Horv'ath, Martin Tak'av{c}
Due to the non-smoothness of optimization problems in Machine Learning, generalized smoothness assumptions have been gaining a lot of attention in recent years. One of the most popular assumptions of this type is $(L_0,L_1)$-smoothness (Zhang et al., 2020). In this paper, we focus on the class of (strongly) convex $(L_0,L_1)$-smooth functions and derive new convergence guarantees for several existing methods. In particular, we derive improved convergence rates for Gradient Descent with (Smoothed) Gradient Clipping and for Gradient Descent with Polyak Stepsizes. In contrast to the existing results, our rates do not rely on the standard smoothness assumption and do not suffer from the exponential dependency from the initial distance to the solution. We also extend these results to the stochastic case under the over-parameterization assumption, propose a new accelerated method for convex $(L_0,L_1)$-smooth optimization, and derive new convergence rates for Adaptive Gradient Descent (Malitsky and Mishchenko, 2020).
Read more9/24/2024
0
A Stochastic Quasi-Newton Method for Non-convex Optimization with Non-uniform Smoothness
Zhenyu Sun, Ermin Wei
Classical convergence analyses for optimization algorithms rely on the widely-adopted uniform smoothness assumption. However, recent experimental studies have demonstrated that many machine learning problems exhibit non-uniform smoothness, meaning the smoothness factor is a function of the model parameter instead of a universal constant. In particular, it has been observed that the smoothness grows with respect to the gradient norm along the training trajectory. Motivated by this phenomenon, the recently introduced $(L_0, L_1)$-smoothness is a more general notion, compared to traditional $L$-smoothness, that captures such positive relationship between smoothness and gradient norm. Under this type of non-uniform smoothness, existing literature has designed stochastic first-order algorithms by utilizing gradient clipping techniques to obtain the optimal $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-3})$ sample complexity for finding an $epsilon$-approximate first-order stationary solution. Nevertheless, the studies of quasi-Newton methods are still lacking. Considering higher accuracy and more robustness for quasi-Newton methods, in this paper we propose a fast stochastic quasi-Newton method when there exists non-uniformity in smoothness. Leveraging gradient clipping and variance reduction, our algorithm can achieve the best-known $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-3})$ sample complexity and enjoys convergence speedup with simple hyperparameter tuning. Our numerical experiments show that our proposed algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches.
Read more9/27/2024
🔗
0
Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Gradient Methods under Refined Smoothness and Noise Assumptions
Devyani Maladkar, Ruichen Jiang, Aryan Mokhtari
Adaptive gradient methods are arguably the most successful optimization algorithms for neural network training. While it is well-known that adaptive gradient methods can achieve better dimensional dependence than stochastic gradient descent (SGD) under favorable geometry for stochastic convex optimization, the theoretical justification for their success in stochastic non-convex optimization remains elusive. In this paper, we aim to close this gap by analyzing the convergence rates of AdaGrad measured by the $ell_1$-norm of the gradient. Specifically, when the objective has $L$-Lipschitz gradient and the stochastic gradient variance is bounded by $sigma^2$, we prove a worst-case convergence rate of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{sqrt{d}L}{sqrt{T}} + frac{sqrt{d} sigma}{T^{1/4}})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem.We also present a lower bound of ${Omega}(frac{sqrt{d}}{sqrt{T}})$ for minimizing the gradient $ell_1$-norm in the deterministic setting, showing the tightness of our upper bound in the noiseless case. Moreover, under more fine-grained assumptions on the smoothness structure of the objective and the gradient noise and under favorable gradient $ell_1/ell_2$ geometry, we show that AdaGrad can potentially shave a factor of $sqrt{d}$ compared to SGD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for adaptive gradient methods that demonstrates a provable gain over SGD in the non-convex setting.
Read more6/10/2024
🛠️
0
Gauges and Accelerated Optimization over Smooth and/or Strongly Convex Sets
Ning Liu, Benjamin Grimmer
We consider feasibility and constrained optimization problems defined over smooth and/or strongly convex sets. These notions mirror their popular function counterparts but are much less explored in the first-order optimization literature. We propose new scalable, projection-free, accelerated first-order methods in these settings. Our methods avoid linear optimization or projection oracles, only using cheap one-dimensional linesearches and normal vector computations. Despite this, we derive optimal accelerated convergence guarantees of $O(1/T)$ for strongly convex problems, $O(1/T^2)$ for smooth problems, and accelerated linear convergence given both. Our algorithms and analysis are based on novel characterizations of the Minkowski gauge of smooth and/or strongly convex sets, which may be of independent interest: although the gauge is neither smooth nor strongly convex, we show the gauge squared inherits any structure present in the set.
Read more7/23/2024