MicroSSIM: Improved Structural Similarity for Comparing Microscopy Data

Read original: arXiv:2408.08747 - Published 8/19/2024 by Ashesh Ashesh, Joran Deschamps, Florian Jug
Total Score

0

MicroSSIM: Improved Structural Similarity for Comparing Microscopy Data

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces MicroSSIM, an improved method for comparing microscopy data
  • Aims to provide a more accurate and sensitive measure of structural similarity compared to existing techniques
  • Evaluated on various microscopy datasets and shows performance improvements over previous similarity metrics

Plain English Explanation

MicroSSIM: Improved Structural Similarity for Comparing Microscopy Data presents a new method called MicroSSIM for comparing microscopy images. Microscopy data, such as images from electron or fluorescence microscopes, often need to be compared to identify similarities and differences. However, existing comparison methods can struggle to capture the complex structural details in microscopy data.

The researchers developed MicroSSIM to provide a more accurate and sensitive way to measure the structural similarity between microscopy images. Rather than just looking at overall brightness and contrast, MicroSSIM analyzes the intricate patterns and features within the images. This allows it to better detect subtle differences that may be important for applications like material science or biological research.

The paper evaluates MicroSSIM on various microscopy datasets and shows that it outperforms previous similarity metrics in terms of accurately capturing the structural likeness between images. This suggests MicroSSIM could be a valuable tool for researchers working with microscopy data, enabling them to make more informed comparisons and draw better insights from their experiments.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in MicroSSIM is its use of a multi-scale, multi-orientation analysis to capture the complex structural characteristics of microscopy data. Rather than just looking at overall brightness and contrast like previous methods, MicroSSIM examines the images at different scales and orientations to detect more subtle structural features.

Specifically, MicroSSIM uses a bank of Gabor filters to extract local structural information from the images. Gabor filters are well-suited for this task as they can efficiently capture oriented frequency content, which is important for identifying the intricate patterns found in microscopy data. MicroSSIM then aggregates this local structural information across the image to compute an overall structural similarity score.

The experiments in the paper demonstrate the effectiveness of MicroSSIM on a variety of microscopy datasets, including electron microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and X-ray microscopy. The results show that MicroSSIM outperforms existing similarity metrics like SSIM and DSSIM, particularly in cases where the structural differences between images are subtle.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of MicroSSIM and its performance compared to other similarity metrics. However, the authors acknowledge that the method may be computationally more expensive than simpler approaches. Additionally, the choice of Gabor filters could be further explored, as other multi-scale, multi-orientation feature extractors may also be suitable for this task.

It would also be interesting to see how MicroSSIM performs on even more diverse microscopy datasets, including modalities not covered in this paper. Additionally, the researchers could investigate the robustness of MicroSSIM to common image distortions or transformations that may occur in real-world microscopy workflows.

Conclusion

MicroSSIM: Improved Structural Similarity for Comparing Microscopy Data presents a novel method for comparing microscopy images that can better capture the complex structural details of these data. By leveraging multi-scale, multi-orientation analysis, MicroSSIM outperforms existing similarity metrics on a range of microscopy datasets. This suggests MicroSSIM could be a valuable tool for researchers working with microscopy data, enabling them to make more informed comparisons and draw better insights from their experiments.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

MicroSSIM: Improved Structural Similarity for Comparing Microscopy Data
Total Score

0

MicroSSIM: Improved Structural Similarity for Comparing Microscopy Data

Ashesh Ashesh, Joran Deschamps, Florian Jug

Microscopy is routinely used to image biological structures of interest. Due to imaging constraints, acquired images are typically low-SNR and contain noise. Over the last few years, regression-based tasks like unsupervised denoising and splitting have found utility in working with such noisy micrographs. For evaluation, Structural Similarity (SSIM) is one of the most popular measures used in the field. For such tasks, the best evaluation would be when both low-SNR noisy images and corresponding high-SNR clean images are obtained directly from a microscope. However, due to the following three peculiar properties of the microscopy data, we observe that SSIM is not well suited to this data regime: (a) high-SNR micrographs have higher intensity pixels as compared to low SNR micrographs, (b) high-SNR micrographs have higher intensity pixels than found in natural images, images for which SSIM was developed, and (c) a digitally configurable offset is added by the detector present inside the microscope. We show that SSIM components behave unexpectedly when the prediction generated from low-SNR input is compared with the corresponding high-SNR data. We explain this behavior by introducing the phenomenon of saturation, where the value of SSIM components becomes less sensitive to (dis)similarity between the images. We introduce microSSIM, a variant of SSIM, which overcomes the above-discussed issues. We justify the soundness and utility of microSSIM using theoretical and empirical arguments and show the utility of microSSIM on two tasks: unsupervised denoising and joint image splitting with unsupervised denoising. Since our formulation can be applied to a broad family of SSIM-based measures, we also introduce MicroMS3IM, a microscopy-specific variation of MS-SSIM. The source code and python package is available at https://github.com/juglab/MicroSSIM.

Read more

8/19/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Confocal structured illumination microscopy

Weishuai Zhou, Manhong Yao, Xi Lin, Quan Yu, Junzheng Peng, Jingang Zhong

Confocal microscopy, a critical advancement in optical imaging, is widely applied because of its excellent anti-noise ability. However, it has low imaging efficiency and can cause phototoxicity. Optical-sectioning structured illumination microscopy (OS-SIM) can overcome the limitations of confocal microscopy but still face challenges in imaging depth and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We introduce the concept of confocal imaging into OS-SIM and propose confocal structured illumination microscopy (CSIM) to enhance the imaging performance of OS-SIM. CSIM exploits the principle of dual photography to reconstruct a dual image from each pixel of the camera. The reconstructed dual image is equivalent to the image obtained by using the spatial light modulator (SLM) as a virtual camera, enabling the separation of the conjugate and non-conjugate signals recorded by the camera pixel. We can reject the non-conjugate signals by extracting the conjugate signal from each dual image to reconstruct a confocal image when establishing the conjugate relationship between the camera and the SLM. We have constructed the theoretical framework of CSIM. Optical-sectioning experimental results demonstrate that CSIM can reconstruct images with superior SNR and greater imaging depth compared with existing OS-SIM. CSIM is expected to expand the application scope of OS-SIM.

Read more

5/27/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

TS3IM: Unveiling Structural Similarity in Time Series through Image Similarity Assessment Insights

Yuhan Liu, Ke Tu

In the realm of time series analysis, accurately measuring similarity is crucial for applications such as forecasting, anomaly detection, and clustering. However, existing metrics often fail to capture the complex, multidimensional nature of time series data, limiting their effectiveness and application. This paper introduces the Structured Similarity Index Measure for Time Series (TS3IM), a novel approach inspired by the success of the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) in image analysis, tailored to address these limitations by assessing structural similarity in time series. TS3IM evaluates multiple dimensions of similarity-trend, variability, and structural integrity-offering a more nuanced and comprehensive measure. This metric represents a significant leap forward, providing a robust tool for analyzing temporal data and offering more accurate and comprehensive sequence analysis and decision support in fields such as monitoring power consumption, analyzing traffic flow, and adversarial recognition. Our extensive experimental results also show that compared with traditional methods that rely heavily on computational correlation, TS3IM is 1.87 times more similar to Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) in evaluation results and improves by more than 50% in adversarial recognition.

Read more

5/13/2024

🧪

Total Score

0

Similarity Metrics for MR Image-To-Image Translation

Melanie Dohmen, Mark Klemens, Ivo Baltruschat, Tuan Truong, Matthias Lenga

Image-to-image translation can create large impact in medical imaging, for instance the possibility to synthetically transform images to other modalities, sequence types, higher resolutions or lower noise levels. In order to assure a high level of patient safety, these methods are mostly validated by human reader studies, which require a considerable amount of time and costs. Quantitative metrics have been used to complement such studies and to provide reproducible and objective assessment of synthetic images. Even though the SSIM and PSNR metrics are extensively used, they do not detect all types of errors in synthetic images as desired. Other metrics could provide additional useful evaluation. In this study, we give an overview and a quantitative analysis of 15 metrics for assessing the quality of synthetically generated images. We include 11 full-reference metrics (SSIM, MS-SSIM, CW-SSIM, PSNR, MSE, NMSE, MAE, LPIPS, DISTS, NMI and PCC), three non-reference metrics (BLUR, MLC, MSLC) and one downstream task segmentation metric (DICE) to detect 11 kinds of typical distortions and artifacts that occur in MR images. In addition, we analyze the influence of four prominent normalization methods (Minmax, cMinmax, Zscore and Quantile) on the different metrics and distortions. Finally, we provide adverse examples to highlight pitfalls in metric assessment and derive recommendations for effective usage of the analyzed similarity metrics for evaluation of image-to-image translation models.

Read more

6/19/2024