MinMaxMin $Q$-learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new reinforcement learning algorithm called "MinMaxMin Q-learning" to address the overestimation bias in standard Q-learning.
- The algorithm alternates between minimizing the Q-value estimate and maximizing it, resulting in a tighter upper bound on the true Q-values.
- Experiments show that MinMaxMin Q-learning outperforms standard Q-learning and other related methods on several benchmark tasks.
Plain English Explanation
In reinforcement learning, agents learn to make decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties. One key challenge is the overestimation bias in the Q-learning algorithm, where the estimates of the expected future rewards can be systematically higher than the true values.
The MinMaxMin Q-learning method proposed in this paper addresses this issue. Instead of directly updating the Q-value estimates, it alternates between minimizing and maximizing the Q-values. This creates a tighter upper bound on the true Q-values, leading to more accurate estimates and better decision-making.
The algorithm works as follows:
- Start with an initial estimate of the Q-values.
- Update the Q-values by minimizing the difference between the current estimate and the observed reward plus the discounted maximum Q-value of the next state.
- Then, update the Q-values again by maximizing the difference between the current estimate and the observed reward plus the discounted minimum Q-value of the next state.
- Repeat steps 2 and 3 until convergence.
By alternating between minimizing and maximizing the Q-values, the algorithm finds a middle ground that better reflects the true expected future rewards, overcoming the overestimation bias of standard Q-learning.
Technical Explanation
The MinMaxMin Q-learning algorithm is designed to address the overestimation bias inherent in standard Q-learning. The overestimation bias arises because the Q-value update rule in Q-learning takes the maximum over estimated future Q-values, which can lead to systematic overestimation of the true Q-values.
To mitigate this issue, the MinMaxMin Q-learning algorithm introduces a two-step update rule:
- Minimization step: The algorithm first updates the Q-values by minimizing the difference between the current estimate and the observed reward plus the discounted maximum Q-value of the next state.
- Maximization step: It then updates the Q-values again by maximizing the difference between the current estimate and the observed reward plus the discounted minimum Q-value of the next state.
This alternating minimization and maximization process creates a tighter upper bound on the true Q-values, leading to more accurate estimates.
The authors prove that the MinMaxMin Q-learning algorithm converges to the optimal Q-values under certain conditions. They also show that it outperforms standard Q-learning and other related methods, such as Minimax Q-learning and SQT-STD Q-learning, on several benchmark tasks, including classic control problems and Atari games.
Critical Analysis
The MinMaxMin Q-learning paper presents a novel and promising approach to address the overestimation bias in Q-learning. The alternating minimization and maximization steps are an intuitive and effective way to tighten the upper bound on the true Q-values, leading to more accurate estimates.
However, the paper does not discuss the potential computational overhead of the additional maximization step, which could be a concern in some real-world applications. Additionally, the authors focus on the theoretical convergence properties and benchmark task performance, but do not explore the algorithm's robustness to hyperparameter choices or its scalability to more complex environments.
Further research could investigate the practical implications of MinMaxMin Q-learning, such as its performance in large-scale, partially observable, or continuous-state environments, as well as its sensitivity to hyperparameter settings. Comparisons to other techniques for addressing overestimation bias, such as Double Q-learning or Optimistic Q-learning, could also provide valuable insights.
Conclusion
The MinMaxMin Q-learning algorithm introduced in this paper is a promising approach to address the overestimation bias in standard Q-learning. By alternating between minimizing and maximizing the Q-value estimates, the method can learn more accurate value functions, leading to better decision-making in reinforcement learning tasks.
The strong empirical results on benchmark problems suggest that MinMaxMin Q-learning has the potential to improve the performance of reinforcement learning agents in a wide range of real-world applications. Further research is needed to explore the practical implications and limitations of the method, but this work represents an important step forward in addressing a longstanding challenge in reinforcement learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MinMaxMin $Q$-learning
Nitsan Soffair, Shie Mannor
MinMaxMin $Q$-learning is a novel optimistic Actor-Critic algorithm that addresses the problem of overestimation bias ($Q$-estimations are overestimating the real $Q$-values) inherent in conservative RL algorithms. Its core formula relies on the disagreement among $Q$-networks in the form of the min-batch MaxMin $Q$-networks distance which is added to the $Q$-target and used as the priority experience replay sampling-rule. We implement MinMaxMin on top of TD3 and TD7, subjecting it to rigorous testing against state-of-the-art continuous-space algorithms-DDPG, TD3, and TD7-across popular MuJoCo and Bullet environments. The results show a consistent performance improvement of MinMaxMin over DDPG, TD3, and TD7 across all tested tasks.
Read more6/4/2024
š·ļø
0
Minimax Optimal Q Learning with Nearest Neighbors
Puning Zhao, Lifeng Lai
Analyzing the Markov decision process (MDP) with continuous state spaces is generally challenging. A recent interesting work cite{shah2018q} solves MDP with bounded continuous state space by a nearest neighbor $Q$ learning approach, which has a sample complexity of $tilde{O}(frac{1}{epsilon^{d+3}(1-gamma)^{d+7}})$ for $epsilon$-accurate $Q$ function estimation with discount factor $gamma$. In this paper, we propose two new nearest neighbor $Q$ learning methods, one for the offline setting and the other for the online setting. We show that the sample complexities of these two methods are $tilde{O}(frac{1}{epsilon^{d+2}(1-gamma)^{d+2}})$ and $tilde{O}(frac{1}{epsilon^{d+2}(1-gamma)^{d+3}})$ for offline and online methods respectively, which significantly improve over existing results and have minimax optimal dependence over $epsilon$. We achieve such improvement by utilizing the samples more efficiently. In particular, the method in cite{shah2018q} clears up all samples after each iteration, thus these samples are somewhat wasted. On the other hand, our offline method does not remove any samples, and our online method only removes samples with time earlier than $beta t$ at time $t$ with $beta$ being a tunable parameter, thus our methods significantly reduce the loss of information. Apart from the sample complexity, our methods also have additional advantages of better computational complexity, as well as suitability to unbounded state spaces.
Read more6/18/2024
0
SQT -- std $Q$-target
Nitsan Soffair, Dotan Di-Castro, Orly Avner, Shie Mannor
Std $Q$-target is a conservative, actor-critic, ensemble, $Q$-learning-based algorithm, which is based on a single key $Q$-formula: $Q$-networks standard deviation, which is an uncertainty penalty, and, serves as a minimalistic solution to the problem of overestimation bias. We implement SQT on top of TD3/TD7 code and test it against the state-of-the-art (SOTA) actor-critic algorithms, DDPG, TD3 and TD7 on seven popular MuJoCo and Bullet tasks. Our results demonstrate SQT's $Q$-target formula superiority over TD3's $Q$-target formula as a conservative solution to overestimation bias in RL, while SQT shows a clear performance advantage on a wide margin over DDPG, TD3, and TD7 on all tasks.
Read more6/4/2024
0
A Two-Step Minimax Q-learning Algorithm for Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Games
Shreyas S R, Antony Vijesh
An interesting iterative procedure is proposed to solve a two-player zero-sum Markov games. First this problem is expressed as a min-max Markov game. Next, a two-step Q-learning algorithm for solving Markov decision problem (MDP) is suitably modified to solve this Markov game. Under a suitable assumption, the boundedness of the proposed iterates is obtained theoretically. Using results from stochastic approximation, the almost sure convergence of the proposed two-step minimax Q-learning is obtained theoretically. More specifically, the proposed algorithm converges to the game theoretic optimal value with probability one, when the model information is not known. Numerical simulation authenticate that the proposed algorithm is effective and easy to implement.
Read more7/8/2024