Minimax Optimal Q Learning with Nearest Neighbors

Overview

• Solving Markov decision processes (MDPs) with continuous state spaces is generally challenging.
• Recent work proposed a nearest neighbor Q-learning approach to solve MDPs with bounded continuous state spaces.
• This paper introduces two new nearest neighbor Q-learning methods, one for offline and one for online settings.
• These methods significantly improve the sample complexity over existing results and have minimax optimal dependence on the accuracy parameter.
• The methods are also more computationally efficient and can handle unbounded state spaces.

Plain English Explanation

Markov decision processes (MDPs) are a mathematical framework used to model and solve decision-making problems in uncertain environments. When the state space of an MDP is continuous, rather than discrete, it becomes much more difficult to solve.

A recent paper proposed a solution to this problem using a nearest neighbor Q-learning approach. This method can solve MDPs with bounded continuous state spaces, but it has a relatively high sample complexity, meaning it requires a lot of data to learn an accurate solution.

In this paper, the authors introduce two new nearest neighbor Q-learning methods, one for offline settings (where all the data is available upfront) and one for online settings (where data is gathered sequentially). These new methods significantly improve the sample complexity over the previous work, requiring much less data to learn an accurate Q-function (a key component of solving an MDP).

The authors achieve this improvement by using the available data more efficiently. The previous method discarded all samples after each iteration, but the new methods either retain all samples (offline) or only remove the oldest samples (online), thus preserving more information. Additionally, the new methods have better computational complexity and can handle unbounded state spaces, which the previous method could not.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes two new nearest neighbor Q-learning methods for solving MDPs with continuous state spaces:

1. Offline Method: This method does not remove any samples, allowing it to use the available data more efficiently than the previous approach, which discarded all samples after each iteration. The authors show that the sample complexity of this offline method is $\tilde{O}(1/(\epsilon^{d+2}(1-\gamma)^{d+2}))$, where $\epsilon$ is the desired accuracy and $\gamma$ is the discount factor.

2. Online Method: This method only removes samples with time earlier than $\beta t$ at time $t$, where $\beta$ is a tunable parameter. This allows the method to retain more information than the previous approach, which again discarded all samples after each iteration. The sample complexity of this online method is $\tilde{O}(1/(\epsilon^{d+2}(1-\gamma)^{d+3}))$.

Both of these new methods significantly improve the sample complexity over the previous state-of-the-art, which had a sample complexity of $\tilde{O}(1/(\epsilon^{d+3}(1-\gamma)^{d+7}))$. The new methods also have better computational complexity and can handle unbounded state spaces, unlike the previous method.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents impressive theoretical results, showing that the new nearest neighbor Q-learning methods have minimax optimal dependence on the accuracy parameter $\epsilon$. This is a significant improvement over the previous state-of-the-art approach.

However, the paper does not provide any empirical evaluation of the new methods. While the theoretical analysis is strong, it would be helpful to see how the methods perform in practice, especially in comparison to the previous approach and other state-of-the-art techniques for solving continuous-state MDPs.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on the sample complexity of the methods, without discussing other important factors such as the computational cost, the sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, or the robustness to model misspecification. These aspects would be important to consider in a complete evaluation of the methods.

Conclusion

This paper introduces two new nearest neighbor Q-learning methods for solving MDPs with continuous state spaces. The key contribution is a significant improvement in the sample complexity of these methods compared to the previous state-of-the-art approach. The new methods also have better computational complexity and can handle unbounded state spaces.

While the theoretical analysis is strong, the lack of empirical evaluation and the focus solely on sample complexity are limitations of the current work. Future research could explore the practical performance of these methods, as well as other important factors such as computational cost, hyperparameter sensitivity, and robustness to model misspecification.