missForestPredict -- Missing data imputation for prediction settings

Read original: arXiv:2407.03379 - Published 7/8/2024 by Elena Albu, Shan Gao, Laure Wynants, Ben Van Calster
Total Score

0

missForestPredict -- Missing data imputation for prediction settings

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces the missForestPredict method for imputing missing data in prediction settings
  • Explains the key features and benefits of the method compared to existing approaches
  • Presents experimental results demonstrating the effectiveness of missForestPredict

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new method called missForestPredict for handling missing data in predictive modeling tasks. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/random-forests-time-fixed-time-dependent-predictors">Many real-world datasets</a> have missing values, which can pose challenges for training accurate predictive models.

missForestPredict is designed to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/imputation-missing-values-multi-view-data">impute</a> or fill in these missing values in a way that improves the performance of the final predictive model. It builds on the popular <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-prediction-under-missingness-shifts">random forest</a> algorithm, using an iterative approach to estimate the missing values based on the observed data and the predictive model.

Compared to other imputation methods, missForestPredict has some key advantages. It can handle both categorical and continuous variables, and it automatically accounts for the relationships between the variables when estimating the missing values. This helps ensure that the imputed data is consistent with the overall data distribution, <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/cast-package-training-assessment-spatial-prediction-models">leading to more accurate predictions</a>.

The paper presents experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrating that missForestPredict outperforms other common imputation techniques, especially when there are high levels of missing data. This suggests the method could be a valuable tool for practitioners working with real-world datasets with incomplete information.

Technical Explanation

The core of the missForestPredict method is an iterative algorithm that alternates between two main steps:

  1. Imputation: The missing values in the dataset are imputed using a random forest model trained on the observed data.
  2. Prediction: A new random forest model is trained on the imputed dataset, and its performance is evaluated on a held-out test set.

These two steps are repeated until the predictive performance of the model converges. The final imputed dataset and trained predictive model are then returned as the output.

The key innovation of missForestPredict is its ability to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/imputation-using-training-labels-classification-via-label">leverage the target variable</a> (the variable to be predicted) when estimating the missing values. This helps ensure that the imputed data is well-suited for the specific prediction task at hand.

The paper also discusses several extensions to the basic missForestPredict algorithm, such as handling different types of missing data mechanisms and incorporating additional sources of information (e.g., prior knowledge about the relationships between variables).

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations of the missForestPredict method. First, it assumes that the missing data is <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-prediction-under-missingness-shifts">missing at random</a>, which may not always be the case in real-world datasets. Additionally, the iterative nature of the algorithm can be computationally intensive, especially for large datasets.

The paper also does not extensively explore the performance of missForestPredict in scenarios with complex, nonlinear relationships between the variables or when the underlying data distribution shifts over time. Further research may be needed to understand the method's robustness in these more challenging settings.

That said, the experimental results presented in the paper are promising, and the authors provide a clear and well-documented implementation of the missForestPredict algorithm. With its ability to handle mixed data types and leverage the target variable, the method seems well-suited for many practical predictive modeling tasks involving missing data.

Conclusion

The missForestPredict method introduced in this paper offers a flexible and effective approach for imputing missing values in predictive modeling settings. By integrating the target variable into the imputation process, the method can produce high-quality imputations that lead to improved predictive performance, especially when dealing with high levels of missing data.

While the method has some limitations, the authors have provided a strong foundation for further research and development in this area. As practitioners continue to grapple with the challenges of missing data in real-world applications, tools like missForestPredict will likely become increasingly valuable for improving the accuracy and robustness of predictive models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

missForestPredict -- Missing data imputation for prediction settings
Total Score

0

missForestPredict -- Missing data imputation for prediction settings

Elena Albu, Shan Gao, Laure Wynants, Ben Van Calster

Prediction models are used to predict an outcome based on input variables. Missing data in input variables often occurs at model development and at prediction time. The missForestPredict R package proposes an adaptation of the missForest imputation algorithm that is fast, user-friendly and tailored for prediction settings. The algorithm iteratively imputes variables using random forests until a convergence criterion (unified for continuous and categorical variables and based on the out-of-bag error) is met. The imputation models are saved for each variable and iteration and can be applied later to new observations at prediction time. The missForestPredict package offers extended error monitoring, control over variables used in the imputation and custom initialization. This allows users to tailor the imputation to their specific needs. The missForestPredict algorithm is compared to mean/mode imputation, linear regression imputation, mice, k-nearest neighbours, bagging, miceRanger and IterativeImputer on eight simulated datasets with simulated missingness (48 scenarios) and eight large public datasets using different prediction models. missForestPredict provides competitive results in prediction settings within short computation times.

Read more

7/8/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Random Forests for time-fixed and time-dependent predictors: The DynForest R package

Anthony Devaux (BPH, GIGH, UNSW), C'ecile Proust-Lima (BPH), Robin Genuer (BPH)

The R package DynForest implements random forests for predicting a continuous, a categorical or a (multiple causes) time-to-event outcome based on time-fixed and time-dependent predictors. The main originality of DynForest is that it handles time-dependent predictors that can be endogeneous (i.e., impacted by the outcome process), measured with error and measured at subject-specific times. At each recursive step of the tree building process, the time-dependent predictors are internally summarized into individual features on which the split can be done. This is achieved using flexible linear mixed models (thanks to the R package lcmm) which specification is pre-specified by the user. DynForest returns the mean for continuous outcome, the category with a majority vote for categorical outcome or the cumulative incidence function over time for survival outcome. DynForest also computes variable importance and minimal depth to inform on the most predictive variables or groups of variables. This paper aims to guide the user with step-by-step examples for fitting random forests using DynForest.

Read more

4/12/2024

forester: A Tree-Based AutoML Tool in R
Total Score

0

forester: A Tree-Based AutoML Tool in R

Hubert Ruczy'nski, Anna Kozak

The majority of automated machine learning (AutoML) solutions are developed in Python, however a large percentage of data scientists are associated with the R language. Unfortunately, there are limited R solutions available. Moreover high entry level means they are not accessible to everyone, due to required knowledge about machine learning (ML). To fill this gap, we present the forester package, which offers ease of use regardless of the user's proficiency in the area of machine learning. The forester is an open-source AutoML package implemented in R designed for training high-quality tree-based models on tabular data. It fully supports binary and multiclass classification, regression, and partially survival analysis tasks. With just a few functions, the user is capable of detecting issues regarding the data quality, preparing the preprocessing pipeline, training and tuning tree-based models, evaluating the results, and creating the report for further analysis.

Read more

9/10/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Imputation for prediction: beware of diminishing returns

Marine Le Morvan (SODA), Gael Varoquaux

Missing values are prevalent across various fields, posing challenges for training and deploying predictive models. In this context, imputation is a common practice, driven by the hope that accurate imputations will enhance predictions. However, recent theoretical and empirical studies indicate that simple constant imputation can be consistent and competitive. This empirical study aims at clarifying if and when investing in advanced imputation methods yields significantly better predictions. Relating imputation and predictive accuracies across combinations of imputation and predictive models on 20 datasets, we show that imputation accuracy matters less i) when using expressive models, ii) when incorporating missingness indicators as complementary inputs, iii) matters much more for generated linear outcomes than for real-data outcomes. Interestingly, we also show that the use of the missingness indicator is beneficial to the prediction performance, even in MCAR scenarios. Overall, on real-data with powerful models, improving imputation only has a minor effect on prediction performance. Thus, investing in better imputations for improved predictions often offers limited benefits.

Read more

7/30/2024