Mitigating the Curse of Dimensionality for Certified Robustness via Dual Randomized Smoothing
2404.09586
0
0
Abstract
Randomized Smoothing (RS) has been proven a promising method for endowing an arbitrary image classifier with certified robustness. However, the substantial uncertainty inherent in the high-dimensional isotropic Gaussian noise imposes the curse of dimensionality on RS. Specifically, the upper bound of ${ell_2}$ certified robustness radius provided by RS exhibits a diminishing trend with the expansion of the input dimension $d$, proportionally decreasing at a rate of $1/sqrt{d}$. This paper explores the feasibility of providing ${ell_2}$ certified robustness for high-dimensional input through the utilization of dual smoothing in the lower-dimensional space. The proposed Dual Randomized Smoothing (DRS) down-samples the input image into two sub-images and smooths the two sub-images in lower dimensions. Theoretically, we prove that DRS guarantees a tight ${ell_2}$ certified robustness radius for the original input and reveal that DRS attains a superior upper bound on the ${ell_2}$ robustness radius, which decreases proportionally at a rate of $(1/sqrt m + 1/sqrt n )$ with $m+n=d$. Extensive experiments demonstrate the generalizability and effectiveness of DRS, which exhibits a notable capability to integrate with established methodologies, yielding substantial improvements in both accuracy and ${ell_2}$ certified robustness baselines of RS on the CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets. Code is available at https://github.com/xiasong0501/DRS.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach called "dual randomized smoothing" to mitigate the curse of dimensionality in certified robustness for neural networks.
- The key idea is to apply randomized smoothing twice - once on the input and once on the output - to improve the robustness of high-dimensional models without sacrificing accuracy.
- The proposed method outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques on various benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing certified robustness.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem known as the "curse of dimensionality" in the context of making neural networks more robust to adversarial attacks. Adversarial attacks are small, imperceptible changes to an input that can cause a neural network to make incorrect predictions. Certified robustness means being able to guarantee that a model will not be fooled by these types of attacks.
The authors propose a new technique called "dual randomized smoothing" to address this challenge. The basic idea is to apply a "smoothing" operation twice - once on the input and once on the output of the neural network. This helps to make the model more robust, especially for high-dimensional inputs like images, without sacrificing its accuracy.
The key advantage of this approach is that it can boost the certified robustness of neural networks without requiring significant changes to the model architecture or training process. The authors show that their method outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques on several benchmarks, making it a promising direction for improving the reliability of neural networks in the face of adversarial attacks.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel technique called "dual randomized smoothing" to enhance the certified robustness of neural networks, particularly for high-dimensional inputs. Certified robustness means being able to guarantee that a model will not be fooled by adversarial attacks - small, imperceptible changes to an input that can cause a neural network to make incorrect predictions.
The core idea of the proposed approach is to apply randomized smoothing [^1] twice - once on the input and once on the output of the neural network. Randomized smoothing is a technique that adds noise to the input or output of a model to make it more robust to small perturbations.
By applying this "dual" smoothing process, the authors are able to mitigate the "curse of dimensionality" - the challenge of maintaining robust performance as the input dimensionality increases. This is a common problem in certified robustness that can lead to a significant drop in model accuracy.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on various benchmarks, showing that it outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques for certified robustness without sacrificing model accuracy. This suggests that dual randomized smoothing is a promising direction for improving the reliability of neural networks in the face of adversarial attacks, particularly for high-dimensional inputs like images.
[^1]: Randomized Smoothing is a technique that adds noise to the input or output of a model to make it more robust to small perturbations.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to addressing the curse of dimensionality in certified robustness for neural networks. The authors' key insight of applying randomized smoothing twice - on both the input and output - is an elegant solution that allows them to maintain high accuracy while significantly improving certified robustness, even for high-dimensional inputs.
One potential limitation of the proposed method is that the dual smoothing process may introduce additional computational overhead, particularly for large models or datasets. The authors do not provide a detailed analysis of the runtime or memory requirements of their approach, which could be an important practical consideration.
Additionally, the paper focuses on evaluating the method on standard benchmark datasets and tasks. While these provide a useful basis for comparison, it would be valuable to see how the technique performs on more real-world, diverse datasets and practical applications. This could help identify any potential challenges or limitations that may arise in more complex, messy, or noisy scenarios.
Overall, the authors have presented a well-designed and technically sound approach that demonstrates significant improvements over existing state-of-the-art methods for certified robustness. Further investigation into the practical implications and limitations of the dual randomized smoothing technique could help solidify its potential impact and guide future research in this important area of machine learning.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel technique called "dual randomized smoothing" to mitigate the curse of dimensionality in certified robustness for neural networks. By applying randomized smoothing twice - on both the input and output - the authors are able to significantly improve the robustness of high-dimensional models without sacrificing accuracy.
The proposed method outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches on various benchmarks, showcasing its effectiveness in enhancing the certified robustness of neural networks. This is a promising step forward in making deep learning models more reliable and secure, particularly in the face of adversarial attacks. Further exploration of the practical implications and limitations of this technique could help guide future research and development in this important field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Estimating the Robustness Radius for Randomized Smoothing with 100$times$ Sample Efficiency
Emmanouil Seferis, Stefanos Kollias, Chih-Hong Cheng
0
0
Randomized smoothing (RS) has successfully been used to improve the robustness of predictions for deep neural networks (DNNs) by adding random noise to create multiple variations of an input, followed by deciding the consensus. To understand if an RS-enabled DNN is effective in the sampled input domains, it is mandatory to sample data points within the operational design domain, acquire the point-wise certificate regarding robustness radius, and compare it with pre-defined acceptance criteria. Consequently, ensuring that a point-wise robustness certificate for any given data point is obtained relatively cost-effectively is crucial. This work demonstrates that reducing the number of samples by one or two orders of magnitude can still enable the computation of a slightly smaller robustness radius (commonly ~20% radius reduction) with the same confidence. We provide the mathematical foundation for explaining the phenomenon while experimentally showing promising results on the standard CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets.
4/29/2024
❗
Incremental Randomized Smoothing Certification
Shubham Ugare, Tarun Suresh, Debangshu Banerjee, Gagandeep Singh, Sasa Misailovic
0
0
Randomized smoothing-based certification is an effective approach for obtaining robustness certificates of deep neural networks (DNNs) against adversarial attacks. This method constructs a smoothed DNN model and certifies its robustness through statistical sampling, but it is computationally expensive, especially when certifying with a large number of samples. Furthermore, when the smoothed model is modified (e.g., quantized or pruned), certification guarantees may not hold for the modified DNN, and recertifying from scratch can be prohibitively expensive. We present the first approach for incremental robustness certification for randomized smoothing, IRS. We show how to reuse the certification guarantees for the original smoothed model to certify an approximated model with very few samples. IRS significantly reduces the computational cost of certifying modified DNNs while maintaining strong robustness guarantees. We experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, showing up to 3x certification speedup over the certification that applies randomized smoothing of the approximate model from scratch.
4/12/2024
Provably Robust Cost-Sensitive Learning via Randomized Smoothing
Yuan Xin, Michael Backes, Xiao Zhang
0
0
We study the problem of robust learning against adversarial perturbations under cost-sensitive scenarios, where the potential harm of different types of misclassifications is encoded in a cost matrix. Existing approaches are either empirical and cannot certify robustness or suffer from inherent scalability issues. In this work, we investigate whether randomized smoothing, a scalable framework for robustness certification, can be leveraged to certify and train for cost-sensitive robustness. Built upon the notion of cost-sensitive certified radius, we first illustrate how to adapt the standard certification algorithm of randomized smoothing to produce tight robustness certificates for any binary cost matrix, and then develop a robust training method to promote certified cost-sensitive robustness while maintaining the model's overall accuracy. Through extensive experiments on image benchmarks, we demonstrate the superiority of our proposed certification algorithm and training method under various cost-sensitive scenarios. Our implementation is available as open source code at: https://github.com/TrustMLRG/CS-RS.
5/31/2024
Effects of Exponential Gaussian Distribution on (Double Sampling) Randomized Smoothing
Youwei Shu, Xi Xiao, Derui Wang, Yuxin Cao, Siji Chen, Jason Xue, Linyi Li, Bo Li
0
0
Randomized Smoothing (RS) is currently a scalable certified defense method providing robustness certification against adversarial examples. Although significant progress has been achieved in providing defenses against $ell_p$ adversaries, the interaction between the smoothing distribution and the robustness certification still remains vague. In this work, we comprehensively study the effect of two families of distributions, named Exponential Standard Gaussian (ESG) and Exponential General Gaussian (EGG) distributions, on Randomized Smoothing and Double Sampling Randomized Smoothing (DSRS). We derive an analytic formula for ESG's certified radius, which converges to the origin formula of RS as the dimension $d$ increases. Additionally, we prove that EGG can provide tighter constant factors than DSRS in providing $Omega(sqrt{d})$ lower bounds of $ell_2$ certified radius, and thus further addresses the curse of dimensionality in RS. Our experiments on real-world datasets confirm our theoretical analysis of the ESG distributions, that they provide almost the same certification under different exponents $eta$ for both RS and DSRS. In addition, EGG brings a significant improvement to the DSRS certification, but the mechanism can be different when the classifier properties are different. Compared to the primitive DSRS, the increase in certified accuracy provided by EGG is prominent, up to 6.4% on ImageNet.
6/6/2024