Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding
2403.18715
0
0
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly adept at generating contextually detailed and coherent responses from visual inputs. However, their application in multimodal decision-making and open-ended generation is hindered by a notable rate of hallucinations, where generated text inaccurately represents the visual contents. To address this issue, this paper introduces the Instruction Contrastive Decoding (ICD) method, a novel approach designed to reduce hallucinations during LVLM inference. Our method is inspired by our observation that what we call disturbance instructions significantly exacerbate hallucinations in multimodal fusion modules. ICD contrasts distributions from standard and instruction disturbance, thereby increasing alignment uncertainty and effectively subtracting hallucinated concepts from the original distribution. Through comprehensive experiments on discriminative benchmarks (POPE and MME) and a generative benchmark (LLaVa-Bench), we demonstrate that ICD significantly mitigates both object-level and attribute-level hallucinations. Moreover, our method not only addresses hallucinations but also significantly enhances the general perception and recognition capabilities of LVLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new technique called "Instruction Contrastive Decoding" to mitigate hallucinations in large vision-language models.
- Hallucinations refer to the generation of incorrect or nonsensical content by these models, which is a major challenge in their real-world deployment.
- The proposed method aims to improve the accuracy and consistency of the models' outputs by leveraging instruction-level supervision during training.
Plain English Explanation
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding is a research paper that explores a new way to address a common issue in large artificial intelligence (AI) models that can "see" and "understand" images and language. These models, known as vision-language models, are trained on vast amounts of data to perform tasks like describing images or answering questions about them.
However, one problem with these models is that they can sometimes generate incorrect or nonsensical content, a phenomenon known as "hallucination." The authors of this paper have developed a new technique called "Instruction Contrastive Decoding" to help reduce these hallucinations and make the models more accurate and reliable.
The key idea is to train the models not just on the image-text pairs, but also on specific instructions or prompts that describe what the model should do. By learning to align its outputs with these instructions, the model becomes better at staying on task and avoiding irrelevant or nonsensical responses.
This approach builds on previous work that has explored ways to mitigate hallucinations in vision-language models, but the authors argue that their technique is more effective and can be applied more broadly.
Technical Explanation
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding presents a novel approach to addressing the problem of hallucinations in large vision-language models. Hallucinations refer to the generation of incorrect or nonsensical content by these models, which is a major challenge in their real-world deployment.
The core of the proposed method is "Instruction Contrastive Decoding," which aims to improve the accuracy and consistency of the models' outputs by leveraging instruction-level supervision during training. Specifically, the authors train the models not only on image-text pairs but also on associated instructions that describe the desired output.
By learning to align the model's outputs with these instructions, the authors show that the models become better at staying on task and avoiding irrelevant or nonsensical responses. This approach builds on previous work that has explored ways to mitigate hallucinations in vision-language models, but the authors argue that their technique is more effective and can be applied more broadly.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets and demonstrate significant improvements in terms of accuracy, consistency, and robustness compared to standard vision-language models. They also provide detailed analyses to understand the key factors contributing to the observed performance gains.
Critical Analysis
The Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding paper presents a promising approach to addressing a critical issue in the deployment of large-scale vision-language models.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on a limited set of benchmark datasets and tasks, and it would be valuable to see how the method performs on a broader range of real-world applications. Additionally, the authors acknowledge that their approach may not be able to entirely eliminate hallucinations, and there may be room for further refinements or combinations with other techniques to achieve even stronger results.
It would also be interesting to see how the proposed method compares to other hallucination mitigation techniques in terms of computational cost, training complexity, and ease of implementation. As with any AI research, it's important to consider the potential ethical implications and ensure that these models are deployed responsibly and with appropriate safeguards.
Conclusion
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding presents a novel and promising approach to addressing the problem of hallucinations in large vision-language models. By leveraging instruction-level supervision during training, the authors have demonstrated significant improvements in the accuracy, consistency, and robustness of these models' outputs.
This work represents an important step forward in improving the reliability and trustworthiness of large-scale AI systems, which will be crucial as they become more widely deployed in real-world applications. While further research and testing are needed, the insights and techniques developed in this paper have the potential to benefit a wide range of vision-language applications, from image captioning to question-answering and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Hallucination-Induced Optimization
Beitao Chen, Xinyu Lyu, Lianli Gao, Jingkuan Song, Heng Tao Shen
0
0
Although Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated exceptional abilities in understanding multimodal data, they invariably suffer from hallucinations, leading to a disconnect between the generated text and the corresponding images. Almost all current visual contrastive decoding methods attempt to mitigate these hallucinations by introducing visual uncertainty information that appropriately widens the contrastive logits gap between hallucinatory and targeted ones. However, due to uncontrollable nature of the global visual uncertainty, they struggle to precisely induce the hallucinatory tokens, which severely limits their effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations and may even lead to the generation of undesired hallucinations. To tackle this issue, we conducted the theoretical analysis to promote the effectiveness of contrast decoding. Building on this insight, we introduce a novel optimization strategy named Hallucination-Induced Optimization (HIO). This strategy seeks to amplify the contrast between hallucinatory and targeted tokens relying on a fine-tuned theoretical preference model (i.e., Contrary Bradley-Terry Model), thereby facilitating efficient contrast decoding to alleviate hallucinations in LVLMs. Extensive experimental research demonstrates that our HIO strategy can effectively reduce hallucinations in LVLMs, outperforming state-of-the-art methods across various benchmarks.
5/27/2024
CODE: Contrasting Self-generated Description to Combat Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models
Junho Kim, Hyunjun Kim, Yeonju Kim, Yong Man Ro
0
0
Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable abilities in visual context understanding and coherent response generation. However, alongside these advancements, the issue of hallucinations has emerged as a significant challenge, producing erroneous responses that are unrelated to the visual contents. In this paper, we introduce a novel contrastive-based decoding method, COuntering DEscription Contrastive Decoding (CODE), which leverages self-generated descriptions as contrasting references during the decoding phase of LMMs to address hallucination issues. CODE utilizes the comprehensive descriptions from model itself as visual counterpart to correct and improve response alignment with actual visual content. By dynamically adjusting the information flow and distribution of next-token predictions in the LMM's vocabulary, CODE enhances the coherence and informativeness of generated responses. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly reduces hallucinations and improves cross-modal consistency across various benchmarks and cutting-edge LMMs. Our method provides a simple yet effective decoding strategy that can be integrated to existing LMM frameworks without additional training.
6/5/2024
🏋️
Prescribing the Right Remedy: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Targeted Instruction Tuning
Rui Hu, Yahan Tu, Jitao Sang
0
0
Despite achieving outstanding performance on various cross-modal tasks, current large vision-language models (LVLMs) still suffer from hallucination issues, manifesting as inconsistencies between their generated responses and the corresponding images. Prior research has implicated that the low quality of instruction data, particularly the skewed balance between positive and negative samples, is a significant contributor to model hallucinations. Recently, researchers have proposed high-quality instruction datasets, such as LRV-Instruction, to mitigate model hallucination. Nonetheless, our investigation reveals that hallucinatory concepts from different LVLMs exhibit specificity, i.e. the distribution of hallucinatory concepts varies significantly across models. Existing datasets did not consider the hallucination specificity of different models in the design processes, thereby diminishing their efficacy in mitigating model hallucination. In this paper, we propose a targeted instruction data generation framework named DFTG that tailored to the hallucination specificity of different models. Concretely, DFTG consists of two stages: hallucination diagnosis, which extracts the necessary information from the model's responses and images for hallucination diagnosis; and targeted data generation, which generates targeted instruction data based on diagnostic results. The experimental results on hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that the targeted instruction data generated by our method are more effective in mitigating hallucinations compared to previous datasets.
4/17/2024
VDGD: Mitigating LVLM Hallucinations in Cognitive Prompts by Bridging the Visual Perception Gap
Sreyan Ghosh, Chandra Kiran Reddy Evuru, Sonal Kumar, Utkarsh Tyagi, Oriol Nieto, Zeyu Jin, Dinesh Manocha
0
0
Recent interest in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) for practical applications is moderated by the significant challenge of hallucination or the inconsistency between the factual information and the generated text. In this paper, we first perform an in-depth analysis of hallucinations and discover several novel insights about how and when LVLMs hallucinate. From our analysis, we show that: (1) The community's efforts have been primarily targeted towards reducing hallucinations related to visual recognition (VR) prompts (e.g., prompts that only require describing the image), thereby ignoring hallucinations for cognitive prompts (e.g., prompts that require additional skills like reasoning on contents of the image). (2) LVLMs lack visual perception, i.e., they can see but not necessarily understand or perceive the input image. We analyze responses to cognitive prompts and show that LVLMs hallucinate due to a perception gap: although LVLMs accurately recognize visual elements in the input image and possess sufficient cognitive skills, they struggle to respond accurately and hallucinate. To overcome this shortcoming, we propose Visual Description Grounded Decoding (VDGD), a simple, robust, and training-free method for alleviating hallucinations. Specifically, we first describe the image and add it as a prefix to the instruction. Next, during auto-regressive decoding, we sample from the plausible candidates according to their KL-Divergence (KLD) to the description, where lower KLD is given higher preference. Experimental results on several benchmarks and LVLMs show that VDGD improves significantly over other baselines in reducing hallucinations. We also propose VaLLu, a benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of the cognitive capabilities of LVLMs.
5/27/2024