CODE: Contrasting Self-generated Description to Combat Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel technique called "CODE" (Contrasting self-generated Description to combat hallucination in large multi-modal models) to address the issue of hallucination in large vision-language models.
- Hallucination refers to the tendency of these models to generate plausible-looking but factually incorrect content, which can be a significant problem in real-world applications.
- The CODE approach aims to mitigate hallucination by having the model generate a self-description of its own output and then comparing it to the actual output, using this comparison to identify and correct any hallucinations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new method called "CODE" to help large AI models that work with images and text avoid generating false or made-up information, which is a common problem with these types of models. The idea is to have the AI model describe its own output, and then compare that self-description to the actual output. If the model's description doesn't match the output, it's a sign that the model has "hallucinated" or invented something that isn't true. By catching these discrepancies, the CODE method can help the AI model correct its mistakes and produce more reliable and accurate results.
This is important because these large vision-language models are being used in many real-world applications, like generating captions for images or summarizing text, and it's crucial that their outputs are truthful and trustworthy. The paper on mitigating object hallucination and the paper on evaluating hallucinations in code generation have also explored this issue of hallucination in AI models.
Technical Explanation
The key idea behind the CODE approach is to have the model generate a self-description of its own output and then compare this self-description to the actual output. If there is a mismatch between the two, it indicates that the model has hallucinated or generated something that is not grounded in the input.
The paper describes a specific implementation of the CODE approach, where the model first generates a caption for an input image. It then generates a second "contrasting caption" that describes the output caption, rather than the original image. By comparing the output caption to the contrasting caption, the model can identify and correct any hallucinations or inconsistencies.
The authors evaluate the CODE approach on several benchmark datasets for image captioning and visual question answering, and show that it significantly reduces hallucination rates compared to standard captioning models. The paper on alleviating hallucinations in large vision-language models and the paper on mitigating hallucinations through cognitive prompts have also explored approaches to this problem.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the CODE approach is that it relies on the model's ability to accurately describe its own output, which may not always be the case. If the model is already prone to hallucination, its self-description may also be flawed, limiting the effectiveness of the approach.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of the CODE approach on the overall performance of the captioning or question-answering tasks. While it may reduce hallucination, it's possible that the additional overhead of generating the contrasting caption could negatively affect the model's ability to perform the primary task.
Further research could investigate ways to improve the robustness of the self-description process, or explore alternative approaches to identifying and correcting hallucinations that do not rely as heavily on the model's own output.
Conclusion
The CODE approach presented in this paper represents a promising step towards addressing the problem of hallucination in large multi-modal AI models. By having the model generate a self-description and compare it to its actual output, the technique can help identify and correct instances of factually incorrect information.
As these types of models become more widely deployed in real-world applications, such as summarizing text, it is crucial to develop robust methods for ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of their outputs. The CODE approach, and the ongoing research in this area, suggests that there are effective ways to mitigate the hallucination problem and improve the overall performance and usefulness of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CODE: Contrasting Self-generated Description to Combat Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models
Junho Kim, Hyunjun Kim, Yeonju Kim, Yong Man Ro
Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable abilities in visual context understanding and coherent response generation. However, alongside these advancements, the issue of hallucinations has emerged as a significant challenge, producing erroneous responses that are unrelated to the visual contents. In this paper, we introduce a novel contrastive-based decoding method, COuntering DEscription Contrastive Decoding (CODE), which leverages self-generated descriptions as contrasting references during the decoding phase of LMMs to address hallucination issues. CODE utilizes the comprehensive descriptions from model itself as visual counterpart to correct and improve response alignment with actual visual content. By dynamically adjusting the information flow and distribution of next-token predictions in the LMM's vocabulary, CODE enhances the coherence and informativeness of generated responses. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly reduces hallucinations and improves cross-modal consistency across various benchmarks and cutting-edge LMMs. Our method provides a simple yet effective decoding strategy that can be integrated to existing LMM frameworks without additional training.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding
Xintong Wang, Jingheng Pan, Liang Ding, Chris Biemann
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly adept at generating contextually detailed and coherent responses from visual inputs. However, their application in multimodal decision-making and open-ended generation is hindered by a notable rate of hallucinations, where generated text inaccurately represents the visual contents. To address this issue, this paper introduces the Instruction Contrastive Decoding (ICD) method, a novel approach designed to reduce hallucinations during LVLM inference. Our method is inspired by our observation that what we call disturbance instructions significantly exacerbate hallucinations in multimodal fusion modules. ICD contrasts distributions from standard and instruction disturbance, thereby increasing alignment uncertainty and effectively subtracting hallucinated concepts from the original distribution. Through comprehensive experiments on discriminative benchmarks (POPE and MME) and a generative benchmark (LLaVa-Bench), we demonstrate that ICD significantly mitigates both object-level and attribute-level hallucinations. Moreover, our method not only addresses hallucinations but also significantly enhances the general perception and recognition capabilities of LVLMs.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) via Language-Contrastive Decoding (LCD)
Avshalom Manevich, Reut Tsarfaty
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are an extension of Large Language Models (LLMs) that facilitate processing both image and text inputs, expanding AI capabilities. However, LVLMs struggle with object hallucinations due to their reliance on text cues and learned object co-occurrence biases. While most research quantifies these hallucinations, mitigation strategies are still lacking. Our study introduces a Language Contrastive Decoding (LCD) algorithm that adjusts LVLM outputs based on LLM distribution confidence levels, effectively reducing object hallucinations. We demonstrate the advantages of LCD in leading LVLMs, showing up to %4 improvement in POPE F1 scores and up to %36 reduction in CHAIR scores on the COCO validation set, while also improving captioning quality scores. Our method effectively improves LVLMs without needing complex post-processing or retraining, and is easily applicable to different models. Our findings highlight the potential of further exploration of LVLM-specific decoding algorithms.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Hallucination-Induced Optimization
Beitao Chen, Xinyu Lyu, Lianli Gao, Jingkuan Song, Heng Tao Shen
Although Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated exceptional abilities in understanding multimodal data, they invariably suffer from hallucinations, leading to a disconnect between the generated text and the corresponding images. Almost all current visual contrastive decoding methods attempt to mitigate these hallucinations by introducing visual uncertainty information that appropriately widens the contrastive logits gap between hallucinatory and targeted ones. However, due to uncontrollable nature of the global visual uncertainty, they struggle to precisely induce the hallucinatory tokens, which severely limits their effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations and may even lead to the generation of undesired hallucinations. To tackle this issue, we conducted the theoretical analysis to promote the effectiveness of contrast decoding. Building on this insight, we introduce a novel optimization strategy named Hallucination-Induced Optimization (HIO). This strategy seeks to amplify the contrast between hallucinatory and targeted tokens relying on a fine-tuned theoretical preference model (i.e., Contrary Bradley-Terry Model), thereby facilitating efficient contrast decoding to alleviate hallucinations in LVLMs. Extensive experimental research demonstrates that our HIO strategy can effectively reduce hallucinations in LVLMs, outperforming state-of-the-art methods across various benchmarks.
Read more5/27/2024