Mixture of Gaussian-distributed Prototypes with Generative Modelling for Interpretable and Trustworthy Image Recognition

Read original: arXiv:2312.00092 - Published 6/6/2024 by Chong Wang, Yuanhong Chen, Fengbei Liu, Yuyuan Liu, Davis James McCarthy, Helen Frazer, Gustavo Carneiro

🖼️

Overview

This document provides guidelines for authors to format their response to reviews for the LATEX conference.
It covers the recommended length of the response, as well as formatting instructions for the document structure and content.
The guidelines aim to ensure a consistent and professional presentation of author responses across submissions.

Plain English Explanation

The LATEX conference has provided these guidelines to help authors properly format their responses to reviews of their research papers. The goal is to ensure all the responses follow a similar structure and style, making it easier for the reviewers to read and evaluate them.

The key points covered in the guidelines include:

Recommended length of the response - authors are advised to keep their response concise and focused.
Instructions for formatting the document - such as using proper section headings, font styles, and layout.
Guidance on the content to include in the response - addressing the reviewers' comments and questions in a clear and professional manner.

By following these guidelines, authors can ensure their responses are well-structured and easy for the reviewers to read and understand. This helps the review process run smoothly and increases the chances of the paper being accepted for publication.

Technical Explanation

The guidelines outline the expected format and structure for author responses to reviews of LATEX conference submissions.

Regarding the response length, the instructions recommend keeping the response concise, typically limited to 1-2 pages. This helps ensure the reviewers can efficiently read and digest the content.

For the document formatting, the guidelines provide specific guidance on elements such as:

Using appropriate section headings (e.g., Introduction, Response to Reviewer Comments, Conclusion)
Applying consistent font styles and sizes
Ensuring proper spacing and layout

The content of the response should focus on directly addressing the reviewers' comments and questions. Authors are advised to:

Acknowledge and respond to each point raised by the reviewers
Explain how they have addressed the concerns or incorporated suggested changes
Provide additional clarification, data, or analysis as necessary

By following these formatting and content guidelines, the author responses will have a consistent and professional appearance, making it easier for the reviewers to assess the changes and improvements made to the paper.

Critical Analysis

The guidelines provided by the LATEX conference appear to be well-thought-out and aimed at ensuring a streamlined review process. The focus on conciseness and clear formatting is reasonable, as it helps the reviewers efficiently parse the responses and focus on the key points.

However, one potential limitation is the restriction on response length. While keeping the responses concise is generally a good practice, there may be cases where authors need more space to adequately address complex reviewer comments or provide detailed explanations. A more flexible approach, such as allowing longer responses with justification, could be considered.

Additionally, the guidelines could be strengthened by providing more specific guidance on the content and tone of the responses. For example, recommendations on how to strike a balance between being responsive to reviewer feedback and maintaining a professional, objective stance could be helpful.

Overall, the guidelines are a useful tool for authors to ensure their responses are well-structured and easy to navigate. By following these instructions, authors can increase the chances of their paper being accepted and contribute to the overall quality of the LATEX conference proceedings.

Conclusion

The LATEX conference has provided clear guidelines to help authors format their responses to review comments in a consistent and professional manner. By adhering to these recommendations, authors can ensure their responses are concise, well-structured, and easy for reviewers to understand.

The key elements covered in the guidelines include the recommended length of the response, instructions for document formatting, and guidance on the content to be included. By following these guidelines, authors can contribute to a streamlined review process and increase the chances of their paper being accepted for publication.

While the guidelines are generally well-designed, there may be opportunities to introduce more flexibility and provide additional guidance on the content and tone of the responses. Overall, these guidelines are a valuable resource for authors participating in the LATEX conference.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Mixture of Gaussian-distributed Prototypes with Generative Modelling for Interpretable and Trustworthy Image Recognition

Chong Wang, Yuanhong Chen, Fengbei Liu, Yuyuan Liu, Davis James McCarthy, Helen Frazer, Gustavo Carneiro

Prototypical-part methods, e.g., ProtoPNet, enhance interpretability in image recognition by linking predictions to training prototypes, thereby offering intuitive insights into their decision-making. Existing methods, which rely on a point-based learning of prototypes, typically face two critical issues: 1) the learned prototypes have limited representation power and are not suitable to detect Out-of-Distribution (OoD) inputs, reducing their decision trustworthiness; and 2) the necessary projection of the learned prototypes back into the space of training images causes a drastic degradation in the predictive performance. Furthermore, current prototype learning adopts an aggressive approach that considers only the most active object parts during training, while overlooking sub-salient object regions which still hold crucial classification information. In this paper, we present a new generative paradigm to learn prototype distributions, termed as Mixture of Gaussian-distributed Prototypes (MGProto). The distribution of prototypes from MGProto enables both interpretable image classification and trustworthy recognition of OoD inputs. The optimisation of MGProto naturally projects the learned prototype distributions back into the training image space, thereby addressing the performance degradation caused by prototype projection. Additionally, we develop a novel and effective prototype mining strategy that considers not only the most active but also sub-salient object parts. To promote model compactness, we further propose to prune MGProto by removing prototypes with low importance priors. Experiments on CUB-200-2011, Stanford Cars, Stanford Dogs, and Oxford-IIIT Pets datasets show that MGProto achieves state-of-the-art image recognition and OoD detection performances, while providing encouraging interpretability results.

6/6/2024

ProtoGMM: Multi-prototype Gaussian-Mixture-based Domain Adaptation Model for Semantic Segmentation

Nazanin Moradinasab, Laura S. Shankman, Rebecca A. Deaton, Gary K. Owens, Donald E. Brown

Domain adaptive semantic segmentation aims to generate accurate and dense predictions for an unlabeled target domain by leveraging a supervised model trained on a labeled source domain. The prevalent self-training approach involves retraining the dense discriminative classifier of $p(class|pixel feature)$ using the pseudo-labels from the target domain. While many methods focus on mitigating the issue of noisy pseudo-labels, they often overlook the underlying data distribution p(pixel feature|class) in both the source and target domains. To address this limitation, we propose the multi-prototype Gaussian-Mixture-based (ProtoGMM) model, which incorporates the GMM into contrastive losses to perform guided contrastive learning. Contrastive losses are commonly executed in the literature using memory banks, which can lead to class biases due to underrepresented classes. Furthermore, memory banks often have fixed capacities, potentially restricting the model's ability to capture diverse representations of the target/source domains. An alternative approach is to use global class prototypes (i.e. averaged features per category). However, the global prototypes are based on the unimodal distribution assumption per class, disregarding within-class variation. To address these challenges, we propose the ProtoGMM model. This novel approach involves estimating the underlying multi-prototype source distribution by utilizing the GMM on the feature space of the source samples. The components of the GMM model act as representative prototypes. To achieve increased intra-class semantic similarity, decreased inter-class similarity, and domain alignment between the source and target domains, we employ multi-prototype contrastive learning between source distribution and target samples. The experiments show the effectiveness of our method on UDA benchmarks.

6/28/2024

New!Multi-Scale Grouped Prototypes for Interpretable Semantic Segmentation

Hugo Porta, Emanuele Dalsasso, Diego Marcos, Devis Tuia

Prototypical part learning is emerging as a promising approach for making semantic segmentation interpretable. The model selects real patches seen during training as prototypes and constructs the dense prediction map based on the similarity between parts of the test image and the prototypes. This improves interpretability since the user can inspect the link between the predicted output and the patterns learned by the model in terms of prototypical information. In this paper, we propose a method for interpretable semantic segmentation that leverages multi-scale image representation for prototypical part learning. First, we introduce a prototype layer that explicitly learns diverse prototypical parts at several scales, leading to multi-scale representations in the prototype activation output. Then, we propose a sparse grouping mechanism that produces multi-scale sparse groups of these scale-specific prototypical parts. This provides a deeper understanding of the interactions between multi-scale object representations while enhancing the interpretability of the segmentation model. The experiments conducted on Pascal VOC, Cityscapes, and ADE20K demonstrate that the proposed method increases model sparsity, improves interpretability over existing prototype-based methods, and narrows the performance gap with the non-interpretable counterpart models. Code is available at github.com/eceo-epfl/ScaleProtoSeg.

9/17/2024

🌐

This Probably Looks Exactly Like That: An Invertible Prototypical Network

Zachariah Carmichael, Timothy Redgrave, Daniel Gonzalez Cedre, Walter J. Scheirer

We combine concept-based neural networks with generative, flow-based classifiers into a novel, intrinsically explainable, exactly invertible approach to supervised learning. Prototypical neural networks, a type of concept-based neural network, represent an exciting way forward in realizing human-comprehensible machine learning without concept annotations, but a human-machine semantic gap continues to haunt current approaches. We find that reliance on indirect interpretation functions for prototypical explanations imposes a severe limit on prototypes' informative power. From this, we posit that invertibly learning prototypes as distributions over the latent space provides more robust, expressive, and interpretable modeling. We propose one such model, called ProtoFlow, by composing a normalizing flow with Gaussian mixture models. ProtoFlow (1) sets a new state-of-the-art in joint generative and predictive modeling and (2) achieves predictive performance comparable to existing prototypical neural networks while enabling richer interpretation.

7/18/2024