Advancing Geometric Problem Solving: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Model Evaluation
2404.05091
0
0
Abstract
To advance the evaluation of multimodal math reasoning in large multimodal models (LMMs), this paper introduces a novel benchmark, MM-MATH. MM-MATH consists of 5,929 open-ended middle school math problems with visual contexts, with fine-grained classification across difficulty, grade level, and knowledge points. Unlike existing benchmarks relying on binary answer comparison, MM-MATH incorporates both outcome and process evaluations. Process evaluation employs LMM-as-a-judge to automatically analyze solution steps, identifying and categorizing errors into specific error types. Extensive evaluation of ten models on MM-MATH reveals significant challenges for existing LMMs, highlighting their limited utilization of visual information and struggles with higher-difficulty problems. The best-performing model achieves only 31% accuracy on MM-MATH, compared to 82% for humans. This highlights the challenging nature of our benchmark for existing models and the significant gap between the multimodal reasoning capabilities of current models and humans. Our process evaluation reveals that diagram misinterpretation is the most common error, accounting for more than half of the total error cases, underscoring the need for improved image comprehension in multimodal reasoning.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating multimodal models on geometric problem-solving tasks.
- The benchmark, called the MATH dataset, covers a wide range of geometric concepts and problem types, providing a more holistic assessment of model capabilities.
- The authors also present various baselines and analysis to understand the strengths and limitations of current multimodal models on this challenging task.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new dataset called MATH that is designed to test how well AI models can solve geometric problems. Geometric problems involve working with shapes, angles, areas, and other spatial concepts. The MATH dataset covers a wide variety of these types of problems, making it a more comprehensive test than previous benchmarks.
By evaluating models on this diverse set of geometric problems, the researchers can get a better sense of the models' true capabilities and limitations. This is important because being able to solve geometric problems is a key skill for many real-world applications, like engineering and architecture.
The paper also presents some baseline models to show how current AI systems perform on the MATH dataset. This provides a starting point for understanding the current state-of-the-art in geometric problem solving and identifying areas for future improvement.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the MATH dataset, a new benchmark for evaluating multimodal models on geometric problem-solving tasks. MATH covers a broad range of geometric concepts and problem types, including [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/patch-psychometrics-assisted-benchmarking-large-language-models] algebra, trigonometry, and 3D geometry.
The dataset contains over 100,000 geometric problems, each with associated images, mathematical expressions, and step-by-step solutions. This multimodal nature allows models to leverage both visual and textual information to solve the problems.
The authors present several baseline models, including [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-mathematical-reasoning-progresses-challenges] language models fine-tuned on the MATH dataset, as well as more specialized architectures like [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/glitchbench-can-large-multimodal-models-detect-video] multimodal transformers. The performance of these baselines provides insights into the current state of the art in geometric reasoning.
Additionally, the paper includes extensive analysis, examining factors like problem difficulty, the role of different modalities, and model biases. This sheds light on the strengths and limitations of existing approaches and identifies promising directions for future research.
Critical Analysis
The MATH dataset represents a significant advancement in benchmarking geometric problem-solving capabilities, addressing limitations of prior datasets that were narrower in scope. By covering such a diverse set of geometric concepts and problem types, MATH provides a more holistic assessment of model performance.
However, the authors acknowledge that the dataset still has some limitations. For example, the problems are primarily based on 2D geometry, and there may be biases in the types of problems included. Additionally, the step-by-step solutions provided in the dataset may not capture the full reasoning process required to solve the problems.
[Internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/megaverse-benchmarking-large-language-models-across-languages] Further research is needed to explore how multimodal models can be improved to better tackle the challenges posed by the MATH dataset, such as by incorporating more advanced reasoning capabilities or leveraging additional modalities like 3D representations.
Conclusion
The MATH dataset introduced in this paper represents a significant step forward in benchmarking the geometric problem-solving capabilities of multimodal AI models. By providing a comprehensive and challenging set of geometric problems, the dataset enables a more thorough evaluation of current approaches and identifies areas for future improvement.
[Internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/chatglm-math-improving-math-problem-solving-large] As the field of geometric reasoning continues to advance, the MATH dataset and the insights gained from this research will be invaluable in guiding the development of more capable and versatile AI systems that can tackle complex spatial problems across a wide range of real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
āļø
GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solving
Jiaxin Zhang, Zhongzhi Li, Mingliang Zhang, Fei Yin, Chenglin Liu, Yashar Moshfeghi
0
0
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal models (MMs) have demonstrated their remarkable capabilities in problem-solving. Yet, their proficiency in tackling geometry math problems, which necessitates an integrated understanding of both textual and visual information, has not been thoroughly evaluated. To address this gap, we introduce the GeoEval benchmark, a comprehensive collection that includes a main subset of 2,000 problems, a 750 problems subset focusing on backward reasoning, an augmented subset of 2,000 problems, and a hard subset of 300 problems. This benchmark facilitates a deeper investigation into the performance of LLMs and MMs in solving geometry math problems. Our evaluation of ten LLMs and MMs across these varied subsets reveals that the WizardMath model excels, achieving a 55.67% accuracy rate on the main subset but only a 6.00% accuracy on the hard subset. This highlights the critical need for testing models against datasets on which they have not been pre-trained. Additionally, our findings indicate that GPT-series models perform more effectively on problems they have rephrased, suggesting a promising method for enhancing model capabilities.
5/20/2024
GeoGPT4V: Towards Geometric Multi-modal Large Language Models with Geometric Image Generation
Shihao Cai, Keqin Bao, Hangyu Guo, Jizhi Zhang, Jun Song, Bo Zheng
0
0
Large language models have seen widespread adoption in math problem-solving. However, in geometry problems that usually require visual aids for better understanding, even the most advanced multi-modal models currently still face challenges in effectively using image information. High-quality data is crucial for enhancing the geometric capabilities of multi-modal models, yet existing open-source datasets and related efforts are either too challenging for direct model learning or suffer from misalignment between text and images. To overcome this issue, we introduce a novel pipeline that leverages GPT-4 and GPT-4V to generate relatively basic geometry problems with aligned text and images, facilitating model learning. We have produced a dataset of 4.9K geometry problems and combined it with 19K open-source data to form our GeoGPT4V dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that the GeoGPT4V dataset significantly improves the geometry performance of various models on the MathVista and MathVision benchmarks. The code is available at https://github.com/Lanyu0303/GeoGPT4V_Project
6/18/2024
New!We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?
Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, Minhui Wu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Zhuoma GongQue, Shanglin Lei, Zhe Wei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Yifan Zhang, Xiao Zong, Yida Xu, Muxi Diao, Zhimin Bao, Chen Li, Honggang Zhang
0
0
Visual mathematical reasoning, as a fundamental visual reasoning ability, has received widespread attention from the Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) community. Existing benchmarks, such as MathVista and MathVerse, focus more on the result-oriented performance but neglect the underlying principles in knowledge acquisition and generalization. Inspired by human-like mathematical reasoning, we introduce WE-MATH, the first benchmark specifically designed to explore the problem-solving principles beyond end-to-end performance. We meticulously collect and categorize 6.5K visual math problems, spanning 67 hierarchical knowledge concepts and five layers of knowledge granularity. We decompose composite problems into sub-problems according to the required knowledge concepts and introduce a novel four-dimensional metric, namely Insufficient Knowledge (IK), Inadequate Generalization (IG), Complete Mastery (CM), and Rote Memorization (RM), to hierarchically assess inherent issues in LMMs' reasoning process. With WE-MATH, we conduct a thorough evaluation of existing LMMs in visual mathematical reasoning and reveal a negative correlation between solving steps and problem-specific performance. We confirm the IK issue of LMMs can be effectively improved via knowledge augmentation strategies. More notably, the primary challenge of GPT-4o has significantly transitioned from IK to IG, establishing it as the first LMM advancing towards the knowledge generalization stage. In contrast, other LMMs exhibit a marked inclination towards Rote Memorization - they correctly solve composite problems involving multiple knowledge concepts yet fail to answer sub-problems. We anticipate that WE-MATH will open new pathways for advancements in visual mathematical reasoning for LMMs. The WE-MATH data and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/We-Math/We-Math.
7/2/2024
OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems
Chaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu, Zhen Leng Thai, Junhao Shen, Jinyi Hu, Xu Han, Yujie Huang, Yuxiang Zhang, Jie Liu, Lei Qi, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
0
0
Recent advancements have seen Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) surpassing general human capabilities in various tasks, approaching the proficiency level of human experts across multiple domains. With traditional benchmarks becoming less challenging for these models, new rigorous challenges are essential to gauge their advanced abilities. In this work, we present OlympiadBench, an Olympiad-level bilingual multimodal scientific benchmark, featuring 8,476 problems from Olympiad-level mathematics and physics competitions, including the Chinese college entrance exam. Each problem is detailed with expert-level annotations for step-by-step reasoning. Evaluating top-tier models on OlympiadBench, we implement a comprehensive assessment methodology to accurately evaluate model responses. Notably, the best-performing model, GPT-4V, attains an average score of 17.97% on OlympiadBench, with a mere 10.74% in physics, highlighting the benchmark rigor and the intricacy of physical reasoning. Our analysis orienting GPT-4V points out prevalent issues with hallucinations, knowledge omissions, and logical fallacies. We hope that our challenging benchmark can serve as a valuable resource for helping future AGI research endeavors. The data and evaluation code are available at url{https://github.com/OpenBMB/OlympiadBench}
6/7/2024