Model-Based Counterfactual Explanations Incorporating Feature Space Attributes for Tabular Data
2404.13224
0
0
Abstract
Machine-learning models, which are known to accurately predict patterns from large datasets, are crucial in decision making. Consequently, counterfactual explanations-methods explaining predictions by introducing input perturbations-have become prominent. These perturbations often suggest ways to alter the predictions, leading to actionable recommendations. However, the current techniques require resolving the optimization problems for each input change, rendering them computationally expensive. In addition, traditional encoding methods inadequately address the perturbations of categorical variables in tabular data. Thus, this study propose FastDCFlow, an efficient counterfactual explanation method using normalizing flows. The proposed method captures complex data distributions, learns meaningful latent spaces that retain proximity, and improves predictions. For categorical variables, we employed TargetEncoding, which respects ordinal relationships and includes perturbation costs. The proposed method outperformed existing methods in multiple metrics, striking a balance between trade offs for counterfactual explanations. The source code is available in the following repository: https://github.com/sumugit/FastDCFlow.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a model-based method for generating counterfactual explanations that incorporate feature space attributes for tabular data.
- Counterfactual explanations provide alternative scenarios that could have resulted in a different model prediction, helping to explain the model's decision-making process.
- The authors introduce a technique that leverages normalizing flows to generate counterfactuals while respecting the underlying feature space characteristics.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you apply for a loan and are denied. You might wonder, "What if I had a higher income or a better credit score? Would I have been approved?" Counterfactual explanations can help answer these questions by suggesting alternative scenarios that could have led to a different outcome.
In this paper, the researchers developed a new method for generating counterfactual explanations for tabular data, such as loan applications or medical records. Their approach uses a type of machine learning model called a "normalizing flow" to create alternative data points that could have changed the model's prediction, while still respecting the natural relationships between the features in the data.
For example, if the model predicts a loan will be denied, the counterfactual explanation might suggest that increasing the applicant's income by a certain amount could have resulted in the loan being approved. Importantly, the suggested change would be grounded in the actual feature space, rather than proposing an unrealistic scenario.
By incorporating these feature space characteristics, the researchers' method aims to provide more plausible and actionable counterfactual explanations to help users understand and trust the model's decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The authors propose a model-based counterfactual explanation method for tabular data that incorporates feature space attributes using normalizing flows. Generating Counterfactual Explanations Using Cardinality Constraints, Framework for Feasible Counterfactual Exploration Incorporating Causality and Sparsity, and Graph Edits for Counterfactual Explanations: A Comparative Study are some related papers that also explore model-based counterfactual explanations.
The key idea is to learn a normalizing flow model that captures the underlying distribution of the feature space. This allows the method to generate counterfactual examples that are grounded in the natural relationships between the features, rather than proposing unrealistic changes. Countarfactuals: Generating Plausible Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations and Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals using Invertible Latent Causal Models are two other related papers that explore the use of normalizing flows and invertible models for generating counterfactuals.
The authors evaluate their approach on several tabular datasets and compare it to existing counterfactual explanation methods. Their results show that the proposed technique can generate more plausible and informative counterfactuals compared to alternative approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed counterfactual explanation method. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work:
- The method relies on the availability of a accurate normalizing flow model to capture the feature space characteristics, which may be challenging for high-dimensional or complex data.
- The evaluation is limited to tabular datasets, and the authors suggest exploring the applicability of the approach to other data modalities, such as images or text.
- The paper does not address the potential ethical and societal implications of deploying counterfactual explanations in real-world applications, such as concerns about algorithmic bias or the misuse of such explanations.
Additionally, one could question whether the proposed method truly provides the "most plausible" counterfactuals, as this may be subjective and context-dependent. Further research could explore user studies or other ways to assess the meaningfulness and actionability of the generated counterfactuals from the end-user's perspective.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel model-based approach for generating counterfactual explanations that incorporate feature space attributes for tabular data. By leveraging normalizing flows, the method can produce counterfactuals that are grounded in the natural relationships between the input features, making them more plausible and informative for users.
The authors' thorough evaluation demonstrates the advantages of their technique compared to existing counterfactual explanation methods. While the approach has some limitations, it represents a valuable contribution to the growing field of interpretable machine learning, which aims to help users understand and trust the decisions made by complex models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Learning-Based Traffic Forecasting
Rushan Wang, Yanan Xin, Yatao Zhang, Fernando Perez-Cruz, Martin Raubal
0
0
Deep learning models are widely used in traffic forecasting and have achieved state-of-the-art prediction accuracy. However, the black-box nature of those models makes the results difficult to interpret by users. This study aims to leverage an Explainable AI approach, counterfactual explanations, to enhance the explainability and usability of deep learning-based traffic forecasting models. Specifically, the goal is to elucidate relationships between various input contextual features and their corresponding predictions. We present a comprehensive framework that generates counterfactual explanations for traffic forecasting and provides usable insights through the proposed scenario-driven counterfactual explanations. The study first implements a deep learning model to predict traffic speed based on historical traffic data and contextual variables. Counterfactual explanations are then used to illuminate how alterations in these input variables affect predicted outcomes, thereby enhancing the transparency of the deep learning model. We investigated the impact of contextual features on traffic speed prediction under varying spatial and temporal conditions. The scenario-driven counterfactual explanations integrate two types of user-defined constraints, directional and weighting constraints, to tailor the search for counterfactual explanations to specific use cases. These tailored explanations benefit machine learning practitioners who aim to understand the model's learning mechanisms and domain experts who seek insights for real-world applications. The results showcase the effectiveness of counterfactual explanations in revealing traffic patterns learned by deep learning models, showing its potential for interpreting black-box deep learning models used for spatiotemporal predictions in general.
5/2/2024
Probabilistically Plausible Counterfactual Explanations with Normalizing Flows
Patryk Wielopolski, Oleksii Furman, Jerzy Stefanowski, Maciej Zik{e}ba
0
0
We present PPCEF, a novel method for generating probabilistically plausible counterfactual explanations (CFs). PPCEF advances beyond existing methods by combining a probabilistic formulation that leverages the data distribution with the optimization of plausibility within a unified framework. Compared to reference approaches, our method enforces plausibility by directly optimizing the explicit density function without assuming a particular family of parametrized distributions. This ensures CFs are not only valid (i.e., achieve class change) but also align with the underlying data's probability density. For that purpose, our approach leverages normalizing flows as powerful density estimators to capture the complex high-dimensional data distribution. Furthermore, we introduce a novel loss that balances the trade-off between achieving class change and maintaining closeness to the original instance while also incorporating a probabilistic plausibility term. PPCEF's unconstrained formulation allows for efficient gradient-based optimization with batch processing, leading to orders of magnitude faster computation compared to prior methods. Moreover, the unconstrained formulation of PPCEF allows for the seamless integration of future constraints tailored to specific counterfactual properties. Finally, extensive evaluations demonstrate PPCEF's superiority in generating high-quality, probabilistically plausible counterfactual explanations in high-dimensional tabular settings. This makes PPCEF a powerful tool for not only interpreting complex machine learning models but also for improving fairness, accountability, and trust in AI systems.
5/29/2024
📊
Generating Counterfactual Explanations Using Cardinality Constraints
Rub'en Ruiz-Torrubiano
0
0
Providing explanations about how machine learning algorithms work and/or make particular predictions is one of the main tools that can be used to improve their trusworthiness, fairness and robustness. Among the most intuitive type of explanations are counterfactuals, which are examples that differ from a given point only in the prediction target and some set of features, presenting which features need to be changed in the original example to flip the prediction for that example. However, such counterfactuals can have many different features than the original example, making their interpretation difficult. In this paper, we propose to explicitly add a cardinality constraint to counterfactual generation limiting how many features can be different from the original example, thus providing more interpretable and easily understantable counterfactuals.
4/12/2024
🔮
Explaining Text Classifiers with Counterfactual Representations
Pirmin Lemberger, Antoine Saillenfest
0
0
One well motivated explanation method for classifiers leverages counterfactuals which are hypothetical events identical to real observations in all aspects except for one categorical feature. Constructing such counterfactual poses specific challenges for texts, however, as some attribute values may not necessarily align with plausible real-world events. In this paper we propose a simple method for generating counterfactuals by intervening in the space of text representations which bypasses this limitation. We argue that our interventions are minimally disruptive and that they are theoretically sound as they align with counterfactuals as defined in Pearl's causal inference framework. To validate our method, we conducted experiments first on a synthetic dataset and then on a realistic dataset of counterfactuals. This allows for a direct comparison between classifier predictions based on ground truth counterfactuals - obtained through explicit text interventions - and our counterfactuals, derived through interventions in the representation space. Eventually, we study a real world scenario where our counterfactuals can be leveraged both for explaining a classifier and for bias mitigation.
4/30/2024