Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Learning-Based Traffic Forecasting
2405.00456
0
0
🤿
Abstract
Deep learning models are widely used in traffic forecasting and have achieved state-of-the-art prediction accuracy. However, the black-box nature of those models makes the results difficult to interpret by users. This study aims to leverage an Explainable AI approach, counterfactual explanations, to enhance the explainability and usability of deep learning-based traffic forecasting models. Specifically, the goal is to elucidate relationships between various input contextual features and their corresponding predictions. We present a comprehensive framework that generates counterfactual explanations for traffic forecasting and provides usable insights through the proposed scenario-driven counterfactual explanations. The study first implements a deep learning model to predict traffic speed based on historical traffic data and contextual variables. Counterfactual explanations are then used to illuminate how alterations in these input variables affect predicted outcomes, thereby enhancing the transparency of the deep learning model. We investigated the impact of contextual features on traffic speed prediction under varying spatial and temporal conditions. The scenario-driven counterfactual explanations integrate two types of user-defined constraints, directional and weighting constraints, to tailor the search for counterfactual explanations to specific use cases. These tailored explanations benefit machine learning practitioners who aim to understand the model's learning mechanisms and domain experts who seek insights for real-world applications. The results showcase the effectiveness of counterfactual explanations in revealing traffic patterns learned by deep learning models, showing its potential for interpreting black-box deep learning models used for spatiotemporal predictions in general.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Deep learning models are widely used for traffic forecasting and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy
- However, these models are "black-box" in nature, making their results difficult for users to interpret
- This study aims to use Explainable AI techniques, specifically counterfactual explanations, to enhance the explainability and usability of deep learning-based traffic forecasting models
- The goal is to elucidate the relationships between input features and model predictions, providing more transparency
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning models are sophisticated algorithms that can make highly accurate predictions, but they can be difficult for people to understand. This study looked at using a special type of Explainable AI called counterfactual explanations to make deep learning-based traffic forecasting models more transparent.
The researchers first built a deep learning model to predict traffic speeds based on historical data and other contextual information. They then used counterfactual explanations to show how changes in the input variables would affect the model's traffic speed predictions. This helps reveal the patterns and relationships the deep learning model has learned.
The counterfactual explanations can be tailored to specific user needs by applying different constraints, such as prioritizing certain variables or looking for changes in a particular direction. This can benefit both machine learning experts trying to understand the model's inner workings, as well as domain experts seeking insights for real-world applications.
Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of counterfactual explanations to make black-box deep learning models more interpretable, especially for spatiotemporal prediction tasks like traffic forecasting.
Technical Explanation
The researchers first developed a deep learning model to predict traffic speeds based on historical traffic data and various contextual variables, such as weather, events, and time of day. This model achieved state-of-the-art performance on the traffic forecasting task.
To enhance the explainability of the deep learning model, the researchers then leveraged counterfactual explanations. Counterfactual explanations show how the model's predictions would change if the input variables were altered in specific ways. This helps reveal the relationships between the input features and the model's outputs.
The researchers implemented a comprehensive framework to generate these counterfactual explanations for the traffic forecasting model. They investigated the impact of different contextual features on the model's traffic speed predictions under varying spatial and temporal conditions.
The counterfactual explanations were further enhanced by incorporating two types of user-defined constraints: directional constraints and weighting constraints. Directional constraints allow users to specify which input variables should be changed in a particular direction (e.g., increase speed limit), while weighting constraints enable users to prioritize certain variables over others.
These scenario-driven counterfactual explanations provide tailored insights that can benefit both machine learning practitioners and domain experts. Practitioners can use the explanations to better understand the model's learning mechanisms, while domain experts can gain valuable insights for real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The study successfully demonstrates the effectiveness of counterfactual explanations in revealing the traffic patterns learned by the deep learning model. This approach has the potential to improve the interpretability of black-box deep learning models used for spatiotemporal predictions in general.
However, the paper does not address potential limitations or caveats of the proposed framework. For example, it does not discuss the computational complexity or scalability of the counterfactual explanation generation process, which could be a concern when dealing with large-scale traffic datasets.
Additionally, the paper does not provide any empirical evaluation of the usability or usefulness of the generated counterfactual explanations from the perspective of domain experts or end-users. Further research could explore how these explanations are perceived and utilized by different stakeholders in real-world traffic management scenarios.
While the study demonstrates the technical feasibility of the approach, more work is needed to fully assess its practical implications and long-term impact on the adoption of deep learning models in traffic forecasting and other spatiotemporal domains.
Conclusion
This study presents a comprehensive framework that leverages counterfactual explanations to enhance the explainability and usability of deep learning-based traffic forecasting models. By revealing the relationships between input variables and model predictions, the proposed approach can help bridge the gap between the black-box nature of deep learning and the need for interpretable results in real-world applications.
The scenario-driven counterfactual explanations, with their user-defined constraints, provide tailored insights that can benefit both machine learning practitioners and domain experts. This work showcases the potential of Explainable AI techniques, such as counterfactual explanations, to improve the transparency and trust in deep learning models, particularly in spatiotemporal domains like traffic forecasting.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Counterfactual Explanations of Black-box Machine Learning Models using Causal Discovery with Applications to Credit Rating
Daisuke Takahashi, Shohei Shimizu, Takuma Tanaka
0
0
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has helped elucidate the internal mechanisms of machine learning algorithms, bolstering their reliability by demonstrating the basis of their predictions. Several XAI models consider causal relationships to explain models by examining the input-output relationships of prediction models and the dependencies between features. The majority of these models have been based their explanations on counterfactual probabilities, assuming that the causal graph is known. However, this assumption complicates the application of such models to real data, given that the causal relationships between features are unknown in most cases. Thus, this study proposed a novel XAI framework that relaxed the constraint that the causal graph is known. This framework leveraged counterfactual probabilities and additional prior information on causal structure, facilitating the integration of a causal graph estimated through causal discovery methods and a black-box classification model. Furthermore, explanatory scores were estimated based on counterfactual probabilities. Numerical experiments conducted employing artificial data confirmed the possibility of estimating the explanatory score more accurately than in the absence of a causal graph. Finally, as an application to real data, we constructed a classification model of credit ratings assigned by Shiga Bank, Shiga prefecture, Japan. We demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method in cases where the causal graph is unknown.
4/30/2024
Model-Based Counterfactual Explanations Incorporating Feature Space Attributes for Tabular Data
Yuta Sumiya, Hayaru shouno
0
0
Machine-learning models, which are known to accurately predict patterns from large datasets, are crucial in decision making. Consequently, counterfactual explanations-methods explaining predictions by introducing input perturbations-have become prominent. These perturbations often suggest ways to alter the predictions, leading to actionable recommendations. However, the current techniques require resolving the optimization problems for each input change, rendering them computationally expensive. In addition, traditional encoding methods inadequately address the perturbations of categorical variables in tabular data. Thus, this study propose FastDCFlow, an efficient counterfactual explanation method using normalizing flows. The proposed method captures complex data distributions, learns meaningful latent spaces that retain proximity, and improves predictions. For categorical variables, we employed TargetEncoding, which respects ordinal relationships and includes perturbation costs. The proposed method outperformed existing methods in multiple metrics, striking a balance between trade offs for counterfactual explanations. The source code is available in the following repository: https://github.com/sumugit/FastDCFlow.
4/23/2024
🎯
Benchmarking Instance-Centric Counterfactual Algorithms for XAI: From White Box to Black Bo
Catarina Moreira, Yu-Liang Chou, Chihcheng Hsieh, Chun Ouyang, Joaquim Jorge, Jo~ao Madeiras Pereira
0
0
This study investigates the impact of machine learning models on the generation of counterfactual explanations by conducting a benchmark evaluation over three different types of models: a decision tree (fully transparent, interpretable, white-box model), a random forest (semi-interpretable, grey-box model), and a neural network (fully opaque, black-box model). We tested the counterfactual generation process using four algorithms (DiCE, WatcherCF, prototype, and GrowingSpheresCF) in the literature in 25 different datasets. Our findings indicate that: (1) Different machine learning models have little impact on the generation of counterfactual explanations; (2) Counterfactual algorithms based uniquely on proximity loss functions are not actionable and will not provide meaningful explanations; (3) One cannot have meaningful evaluation results without guaranteeing plausibility in the counterfactual generation. Algorithms that do not consider plausibility in their internal mechanisms will lead to biased and unreliable conclusions if evaluated with the current state-of-the-art metrics; (4) A counterfactual inspection analysis is strongly recommended to ensure a robust examination of counterfactual explanations and the potential identification of biases.
6/12/2024
Watermarking Counterfactual Explanations
Hangzhi Guo, Amulya Yadav
0
0
The field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) focuses on techniques for providing explanations to end-users about the decision-making processes that underlie modern-day machine learning (ML) models. Within the vast universe of XAI techniques, counterfactual (CF) explanations are often preferred by end-users as they help explain the predictions of ML models by providing an easy-to-understand & actionable recourse (or contrastive) case to individual end-users who are adversely impacted by predicted outcomes. However, recent studies have shown significant security concerns with using CF explanations in real-world applications; in particular, malicious adversaries can exploit CF explanations to perform query-efficient model extraction attacks on proprietary ML models. In this paper, we propose a model-agnostic watermarking framework (for adding watermarks to CF explanations) that can be leveraged to detect unauthorized model extraction attacks (which rely on the watermarked CF explanations). Our novel framework solves a bi-level optimization problem to embed an indistinguishable watermark into the generated CF explanation such that any future model extraction attacks that rely on these watermarked CF explanations can be detected using a null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) scheme, while ensuring that these embedded watermarks do not compromise the quality of the generated CF explanations. We evaluate this framework's performance across a diverse set of real-world datasets, CF explanation methods, and model extraction techniques, and show that our watermarking detection system can be used to accurately identify extracted ML models that are trained using the watermarked CF explanations. Our work paves the way for the secure adoption of CF explanations in real-world applications.
5/30/2024