Model Based and Physics Informed Deep Learning Neural Network Structures

Read original: arXiv:2408.07104 - Published 8/15/2024 by Ali Mohammad-Djafari, Ning Chu, Li Wang, Caifang Cai, Liang Yu
Total Score

0

Model Based and Physics Informed Deep Learning Neural Network Structures

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes new neural network structures that incorporate physical models and principles to improve the performance of deep learning on challenging inverse problems.
  • The authors explore how to best integrate physical knowledge into deep learning architectures for solving inverse problems.
  • They consider two types of inverse problems: parameter estimation and function approximation.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are powerful machine learning models that can learn complex patterns in data. However, when applied to challenging inverse problems, they may struggle to generalize or require large amounts of training data.

To address this, the authors introduce neural network structures that incorporate prior physical knowledge and principles. This "physics-informed" approach aims to improve the performance of deep learning on inverse problems by leveraging our understanding of the underlying physical processes.

The paper explores two main types of inverse problems: parameter estimation and function approximation. In parameter estimation, the goal is to infer the values of hidden parameters that govern a physical system from observed data. In function approximation, the task is to learn an unknown function that maps inputs to outputs based on available data.

By incorporating physical models and constraints into the neural network architecture, the authors hypothesize that the models will be better able to generalize and require less training data to achieve high performance on these challenging inverse problems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces several novel neural network structures that incorporate physical models and principles:

  1. Model-based neural networks: These architectures directly embed a physical model as a component of the neural network, allowing the model to learn corrections to the physical model based on data.

  2. Physics-informed neural networks: These networks incorporate physical constraints and principles, such as conservation laws or partial differential equations, into the loss function or architecture to guide the training process.

The authors evaluate these physics-informed neural network structures on both parameter estimation and function approximation inverse problems. Their experiments demonstrate that these approaches can outperform traditional black-box neural networks, particularly when the available training data is limited.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of how to best integrate physical knowledge into deep learning for inverse problems. The proposed architectures show promise, but the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:

  • The performance gains depend on the quality and relevance of the incorporated physical models. Inaccurate or incomplete physical knowledge could actually hinder the neural network's performance.
  • The authors only consider simple 1D and 2D inverse problems in their experiments. Scaling these approaches to more complex, high-dimensional problems remains an open challenge.
  • The paper does not address the interpretability or explainability of the physics-informed neural networks. Understanding the reasoning behind the models' decisions is an important consideration for many real-world applications.

Overall, this work represents an important step towards bridging the gap between physical modeling and data-driven machine learning. Continued research in this direction could lead to powerful hybrid approaches that leverage the strengths of both paradigms.

Conclusion

This paper presents novel neural network structures that incorporate physical models and principles to improve performance on challenging inverse problems. By leveraging our understanding of the underlying physics, these "physics-informed" neural networks can achieve better generalization and data efficiency compared to traditional black-box models.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approaches on parameter estimation and function approximation tasks, but also identify several limitations that warrant further exploration. Integrating physical knowledge with deep learning remains an active area of research with significant potential to advance the capabilities of AI systems in a wide range of scientific and engineering applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Model Based and Physics Informed Deep Learning Neural Network Structures
Total Score

0

Model Based and Physics Informed Deep Learning Neural Network Structures

Ali Mohammad-Djafari, Ning Chu, Li Wang, Caifang Cai, Liang Yu

Neural Networks (NN) has been used in many areas with great success. When a NN's structure (Model) is given, during the training steps, the parameters of the model are determined using an appropriate criterion and an optimization algorithm (Training). Then, the trained model can be used for the prediction or inference step (Testing). As there are also many hyperparameters, related to the optimization criteria and optimization algorithms, a validation step is necessary before its final use. One of the great difficulties is the choice of the NN's structure. Even if there are many on the shelf networks, selecting or proposing a new appropriate network for a given data, signal or image processing, is still an open problem. In this work, we consider this problem using model based signal and image processing and inverse problems methods. We classify the methods in five classes, based on: i) Explicit analytical solutions, ii) Transform domain decomposition, iii) Operator Decomposition, iv) Optimization algorithms unfolding, and v) Physics Informed NN methods (PINN). Few examples in each category are explained.

Read more

8/15/2024

Point Neuron Learning: A New Physics-Informed Neural Network Architecture
Total Score

0

Point Neuron Learning: A New Physics-Informed Neural Network Architecture

Hanwen Bi, Thushara D. Abhayapala

Machine learning and neural networks have advanced numerous research domains, but challenges such as large training data requirements and inconsistent model performance hinder their application in certain scientific problems. To overcome these challenges, researchers have investigated integrating physics principles into machine learning models, mainly through: (i) physics-guided loss functions, generally termed as physics-informed neural networks, and (ii) physics-guided architectural design. While both approaches have demonstrated success across multiple scientific disciplines, they have limitations including being trapped to a local minimum, poor interpretability, and restricted generalizability. This paper proposes a new physics-informed neural network (PINN) architecture that combines the strengths of both approaches by embedding the fundamental solution of the wave equation into the network architecture, enabling the learned model to strictly satisfy the wave equation. The proposed point neuron learning method can model an arbitrary sound field based on microphone observations without any dataset. Compared to other PINN methods, our approach directly processes complex numbers and offers better interpretability and generalizability. We evaluate the versatility of the proposed architecture by a sound field reconstruction problem in a reverberant environment. Results indicate that the point neuron method outperforms two competing methods and can efficiently handle noisy environments with sparse microphone observations.

Read more

9/2/2024

Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Extensions
Total Score

0

Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Extensions

Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, Nazanin Ahmadi, George Em Karniadakis

In this paper, we review the new method Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) that has become the main pillar in scientific machine learning, we present recent practical extensions, and provide a specific example in data-driven discovery of governing differential equations.

Read more

9/2/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Physics-Informed Neural Network for Concrete Manufacturing Process Optimization

Sam Varghese, Rahul Anand, Dr. Gaurav Paliwal

Concrete manufacturing projects are one of the most common ones for consulting agencies. Because of the highly non-linear dependency of input materials like ash, water, cement, superplastic, etc; with the resultant strength of concrete, it gets difficult for machine learning models to successfully capture this relation and perform cost optimizations. This paper highlights how PINNs (Physics Informed Neural Networks) can be useful in the given situation. This state-of-the-art model shall also get compared with traditional models like Linear Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Deep Neural Network. Results of the research highlights how well PINNs performed even with reduced dataset, thus resolving one of the biggest issues of limited data availability for ML models. On an average, PINN got the loss value reduced by 26.3% even with 40% lesser data compared to the Deep Neural Network. In addition to predicting strength of the concrete given the quantity of raw materials, the paper also highlights the use of heuristic optimization method like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in predicting quantity of raw materials required to manufacture concrete of given strength with least cost.

Read more

8/29/2024