Modeling Latent Selection with Structural Causal Models
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper presents a novel approach to conditioning operations on structural causal models (SCMs).
- The authors introduce a method for conditioning SCMs on observed data and deriving counterfactual queries.
- The paper explores the theoretical foundations and practical applications of this conditioning operation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a technique for conditioning structural causal models (SCMs) on observed data. SCMs are a way to represent the causal relationships between different variables in a system.
The key idea is that once you have an SCM, you can use it to answer "what-if" questions - for example, what would happen if we change one variable in the system? The authors present a method for deriving counterfactual queries from the SCM, allowing you to explore different hypothetical scenarios.
This conditioning operation is important because it allows you to take an SCM and adapt it to reflect the actual observed data, rather than relying solely on the theoretical model. By incorporating the observed data, you can make more accurate predictions and gain deeper insights into the causal structure of the system.
Technical Explanation
The paper formalizes the process of conditioning SCMs on observed data. The authors define a "conditioning operation" that takes an SCM and a set of observed variables, and produces a new SCM that is consistent with the observed data.
This conditioning operation involves deriving the interventional distribution of the SCM, which describes the probability distribution of the variables after an intervention is made. The authors show how to compute this interventional distribution and use it to answer counterfactual queries.
The paper also discusses methods for learning the structure of an SCM from data, which is an important step in applying this conditioning approach in practice.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical foundation for conditioning SCMs on observed data, but it does not address some practical challenges that may arise when applying this approach.
For example, the authors assume that the underlying SCM is known and correctly specified. In real-world scenarios, the true causal structure is often unknown or uncertain, which could lead to biases in the conditioning operation and the resulting counterfactual queries.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss how to handle missing data or measurement errors, which are common issues in empirical studies. Extending the conditioning operation to handle these practical challenges could be an area for future research.
Conclusion
This research advances the field of structural causal modeling by introducing a novel conditioning operation that allows SCMs to be adapted to observed data. This capability is crucial for applying SCMs to real-world problems and deriving actionable insights from causal models.
The paper lays a strong theoretical foundation, but further work is needed to address practical limitations and expand the applicability of this conditioning approach. Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the use of causal models for decision-making and prediction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
Modeling Latent Selection with Structural Causal Models
Leihao Chen, Onno Zoeter, Joris M. Mooij
Selection bias is ubiquitous in real-world data, and can lead to misleading results if not dealt with properly. We introduce a conditioning operation on Structural Causal Models (SCMs) to model latent selection from a causal perspective. We show that the conditioning operation transforms an SCM with the presence of an explicit latent selection mechanism into an SCM without such selection mechanism, which partially encodes the causal semantics of the selected subpopulation according to the original SCM. Furthermore, we show that this conditioning operation preserves the simplicity, acyclicity, and linearity of SCMs, and commutes with marginalization. Thanks to these properties, combined with marginalization and intervention, the conditioning operation offers a valuable tool for conducting causal reasoning tasks within causal models where latent details have been abstracted away. We demonstrate by example how classical results of causal inference can be generalized to include selection bias and how the conditioning operation helps with modeling of real-world problems.
Read more8/2/2024
0
Detecting and Identifying Selection Structure in Sequential Data
Yujia Zheng, Zeyu Tang, Yiwen Qiu, Bernhard Scholkopf, Kun Zhang
We argue that the selective inclusion of data points based on latent objectives is common in practical situations, such as music sequences. Since this selection process often distorts statistical analysis, previous work primarily views it as a bias to be corrected and proposes various methods to mitigate its effect. However, while controlling this bias is crucial, selection also offers an opportunity to provide a deeper insight into the hidden generation process, as it is a fundamental mechanism underlying what we observe. In particular, overlooking selection in sequential data can lead to an incomplete or overcomplicated inductive bias in modeling, such as assuming a universal autoregressive structure for all dependencies. Therefore, rather than merely viewing it as a bias, we explore the causal structure of selection in sequential data to delve deeper into the complete causal process. Specifically, we show that selection structure is identifiable without any parametric assumptions or interventional experiments. Moreover, even in cases where selection variables coexist with latent confounders, we still establish the nonparametric identifiability under appropriate structural conditions. Meanwhile, we also propose a provably correct algorithm to detect and identify selection structures as well as other types of dependencies. The framework has been validated empirically on both synthetic data and real-world music.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Standardizing Structural Causal Models
Weronika Ormaniec, Scott Sussex, Lars Lorch, Bernhard Scholkopf, Andreas Krause
Synthetic datasets generated by structural causal models (SCMs) are commonly used for benchmarking causal structure learning algorithms. However, the variances and pairwise correlations in SCM data tend to increase along the causal ordering. Several popular algorithms exploit these artifacts, possibly leading to conclusions that do not generalize to real-world settings. Existing metrics like $operatorname{Var}$-sortability and $operatorname{R^2}$-sortability quantify these patterns, but they do not provide tools to remedy them. To address this, we propose internally-standardized structural causal models (iSCMs), a modification of SCMs that introduces a standardization operation at each variable during the generative process. By construction, iSCMs are not $operatorname{Var}$-sortable, and as we show experimentally, not $operatorname{R^2}$-sortable either for commonly-used graph families. Moreover, contrary to the post-hoc standardization of data generated by standard SCMs, we prove that linear iSCMs are less identifiable from prior knowledge on the weights and do not collapse to deterministic relationships in large systems, which may make iSCMs a useful model in causal inference beyond the benchmarking problem studied here.
Read more6/18/2024
🏋️
0
Local Causal Structure Learning in the Presence of Latent Variables
Feng Xie, Zheng Li, Peng Wu, Yan Zeng, Chunchen Liu, Zhi Geng
Discovering causal relationships from observational data, particularly in the presence of latent variables, poses a challenging problem. While current local structure learning methods have proven effective and efficient when the focus lies solely on the local relationships of a target variable, they operate under the assumption of causal sufficiency. This assumption implies that all the common causes of the measured variables are observed, leaving no room for latent variables. Such a premise can be easily violated in various real-world applications, resulting in inaccurate structures that may adversely impact downstream tasks. In light of this, our paper delves into the primary investigation of locally identifying potential parents and children of a target from observational data that may include latent variables. Specifically, we harness the causal information from m-separation and V-structures to derive theoretical consistency results, effectively bridging the gap between global and local structure learning. Together with the newly developed stop rules, we present a principled method for determining whether a variable is a direct cause or effect of a target. Further, we theoretically demonstrate the correctness of our approach under the standard causal Markov and faithfulness conditions, with infinite samples. Experimental results on both synthetic and real-world data validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach.
Read more6/7/2024