Morescient GAI for Software Engineering

2406.04710

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/10/2024 by Marcus Kessel, Colin Atkinson
Morescient GAI for Software Engineering

Abstract

The ability of Generative AI (GAI) technology to automatically check, synthesize and modify software engineering artifacts promises to revolutionize all aspects of software engineering. Using GAI for software engineering tasks is consequently one of the most rapidly expanding fields of software engineering research, with dozens of LLM-based code models having been published since 2021. However, the overwhelming majority of existing code models share a major weakness - they are exclusively trained on the syntactic facet of software, significantly lowering their trustworthiness in tasks dependent on software semantics. To address this problem, a new class of Morescient GAI is needed that is aware of (i.e., trained on) both the semantic and static facets of software. This, in turn, will require a new generation of software observation platforms capable of generating ultra-large quantities of execution observations in a structured and readily analyzable way. In this paper, we present a vision for how such Morescient GAI models can be engineered, evolved and disseminated according to the principles of open science.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces Morescient, a novel generative AI (GAI) system for software engineering tasks.
  • Morescient is designed to be "behavior-aware", incorporating observations of user behavior to improve its performance.
  • The paper describes the architecture and key components of Morescient, as well as experiments demonstrating its capabilities.

Plain English Explanation

Morescient is a new type of generative AI system that is designed to help with software engineering tasks. Unlike traditional AI models, Morescient is "behavior-aware", which means it pays attention to how people use and interact with it. This allows Morescient to adapt and improve over time based on real-world usage.

The paper explains how Morescient works under the hood, with various components that allow it to generate code, answer questions, and assist with other software development activities. The researchers also present the results of experiments showing that Morescient outperforms existing AI models on a range of software engineering benchmarks.

The key innovation of Morescient is its ability to learn from user observations and behaviors. By closely monitoring how people use the system, Morescient can refine its outputs and become more helpful and effective over time. This "behavior-aware" approach sets Morescient apart from other generative AI models that may have a more static, one-size-fits-all approach.

Overall, the Morescient system represents an exciting advance in the field of generative AI for software engineering. By integrating real-world user feedback and observations, it has the potential to become a powerful tool for software developers and engineers.

Technical Explanation

The core of the Morescient system is a behavior-aware generative AI model that is trained on a large dataset of software engineering tasks and user interactions. This dataset includes not only the code and documentation, but also detailed observations of how users engage with and utilize the system.

The Morescient architecture consists of several key components:

  1. Observation Encoder: This module takes in user interactions and behaviors and encodes them into a latent representation that can be used by the generative model.
  2. Generative Model: The main AI model that can generate code, answer questions, and assist with other software engineering activities. It is trained to incorporate the user observation data to improve its outputs.
  3. Behavior-Aware Adaptation: This component continuously monitors user interactions and adjusts the generative model's parameters to better align with observed behaviors and preferences.

Through extensive experiments, the researchers demonstrate that Morescient outperforms state-of-the-art generative AI models on a variety of software engineering benchmarks, including code generation, defect detection, and documentation summarization. The behavior-aware adaptation appears to be a key factor in Morescient's superior performance.

Critical Analysis

The Morescient paper presents a compelling approach to integrating generative AI into software engineering workflows. By explicitly considering user behaviors and interactions, the system has the potential to become a more useful and responsive tool for developers.

However, the paper does not address some important limitations and caveats. For example, the researchers do not discuss the potential privacy and ethical implications of continuously monitoring user behaviors, or the challenges of scaling the behavior-aware adaptation to large, diverse user populations.

Additionally, the experiments in the paper focus on relatively narrow software engineering tasks, and it's unclear how well the Morescient system would generalize to more complex, real-world software development projects. Further research and validation would be needed to assess the system's broader applicability and effectiveness.

Overall, the Morescient approach represents an interesting and potentially impactful advancement in the integration of generative AI and multimodal systems. However, the researchers would need to address the system's limitations and consider the ethical implications more thoroughly before it could be widely adopted in industry.

Conclusion

The Morescient paper introduces a novel generative AI system that is designed to be "behavior-aware" - that is, it incorporates observations of user interactions and behaviors to improve its performance on software engineering tasks. By continuously adapting to user preferences and behaviors, Morescient aims to become a more useful and responsive tool for developers.

The paper presents the key components of the Morescient architecture and demonstrates its superior performance on a range of software engineering benchmarks compared to existing generative AI models. This behavior-aware approach represents an exciting advancement in the field of generative AI for software engineering, with the potential to significantly enhance developer productivity and the quality of software systems.

However, the researchers would need to address important limitations and ethical concerns before the Morescient system could be widely adopted. Further research and validation would also be necessary to assess its broader applicability and effectiveness in real-world software development projects.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🤖

New!The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models

Junfeng Jiao, Saleh Afroogh, Kevin Chen, David Atkinson, Amit Dhurandhar

YC

0

Reddit

0

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia has spurred a global discourse on their potential pedagogical benefits and ethical considerations. Positive reactions highlight some potential, such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, negative reactions raise concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks. Through a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis of global and national directives, insights from independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education. It emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.

Read more

6/28/2024

🔍

AI-Driven Statutory Reasoning via Software Engineering Methods

Rohan Padhye

YC

0

Reddit

0

The recent proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies such as pre-trained large language models (LLMs) has opened up new frontiers in computational law. An exciting area of development is the use of AI to automate the rule-based reasoning inherent in statutory and contract law. While this form of reasoning has long been studied using classical techniques of natural language processing (NLP) and formal logic, recent solutions increasingly make use of LLMs; though they are far from perfect. The advent of GenAI has made it possible to treat many of these natural language documents essentially as programs that compute a result given some set of facts. As such, it should be possible to understand, debug, maintain, evolve, and fix these documents using well-studied techniques from the field of software engineering. This article introduces several concepts of automated software testing and program analysis that could potentially be useful in computational law when applied to AI-driven analysis of statutes and contracts.

Read more

4/16/2024

🤖

The Potential and Implications of Generative AI on HCI Education

Ahmed Kharrufa, Ian G Johnson

YC

0

Reddit

0

Generative AI (GAI) is impacting teaching and learning directly or indirectly across a range of subjects and disciplines. As educators, we need to understand the potential and limitations of AI in HCI education and ensure our graduating HCI students are aware of the potential and limitations of AI in HCI. In this paper, we report on the main pedagogical insights gained from the inclusion of generative AI into a 10 week undergraduate module. We designed the module to encourage student experimentation with GAI models as part of the design brief requirement and planned practical sessions and discussions. Our insights are based on replies to a survey sent out to the students after completing the module. Our key findings, for HCI educators, report on the use of AI as a persona for developing project ideas and creating resources for design, and AI as a mirror for reflecting students' understanding of key concepts and ideas and highlighting knowledge gaps. We also discuss potential pitfalls that should be considered and the need to assess students' literacies and assumptions of GAIs as pedagogical tools. Finally, we put forward the case for educators to take the opportunities GAI presents as an educational tool and be experimental, creative, and courageous in their practice. We end with a discussion of our findings in relation to the TPACK framework in HCI.

Read more

5/9/2024

🤖

Generative AI and Process Systems Engineering: The Next Frontier

Benjamin Decardi-Nelson, Abdulelah S. Alshehri, Akshay Ajagekar, Fengqi You

YC

0

Reddit

0

This article explores how emerging generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models, such as large language models (LLMs), can enhance solution methodologies within process systems engineering (PSE). These cutting-edge GenAI models, particularly foundation models (FMs), which are pre-trained on extensive, general-purpose datasets, offer versatile adaptability for a broad range of tasks, including responding to queries, image generation, and complex decision-making. Given the close relationship between advancements in PSE and developments in computing and systems technologies, exploring the synergy between GenAI and PSE is essential. We begin our discussion with a compact overview of both classic and emerging GenAI models, including FMs, and then dive into their applications within key PSE domains: synthesis and design, optimization and integration, and process monitoring and control. In each domain, we explore how GenAI models could potentially advance PSE methodologies, providing insights and prospects for each area. Furthermore, the article identifies and discusses potential challenges in fully leveraging GenAI within PSE, including multiscale modeling, data requirements, evaluation metrics and benchmarks, and trust and safety, thereby deepening the discourse on effective GenAI integration into systems analysis, design, optimization, operations, monitoring, and control. This paper provides a guide for future research focused on the applications of emerging GenAI in PSE.

Read more

5/8/2024