The Potential and Implications of Generative AI on HCI Education

Overview

• This paper explores how generative AI (GAI) is impacting teaching and learning in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) education.
• The authors designed a 10-week undergraduate module to encourage student experimentation with GAI models as part of a design project.
• They conducted a student survey to gather insights on the use of GAI in HCI education.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses how generative AI is affecting the way HCI (human-computer interaction) is taught and learned. The researchers created a 10-week course where students used GAI models as part of their design projects. After the course, they surveyed the students to understand their experiences and insights.

The key findings suggest that GAI can be useful for developing project ideas and creating design resources, as well as reflecting students' understanding of HCI concepts. However, educators need to be aware of potential pitfalls and assess students' assumptions about GAI. The researchers encourage educators to embrace the opportunities GAI presents and experiment with it in their teaching.

Technical Explanation

The researchers designed a 10-week undergraduate module that incorporated GAI models as part of the design brief requirements. Students were encouraged to experiment with GAI models, such as using them to generate personas or create design resources. The authors then surveyed the students to gather insights on their experiences and perspectives.

Their key findings include:

• GAI can be useful for developing project ideas and creating design resources, as students found it helped them ideate and generate content.
• GAI can also serve as a "mirror" for reflecting students' understanding of HCI concepts, as it highlighted their knowledge gaps.
• Educators need to be aware of potential pitfalls, such as students over-relying on GAI or making incorrect assumptions about its capabilities.
• There is a need to assess students' digital literacies and assumptions about GAI to ensure they are using it effectively and critically.

The researchers argue that educators should embrace the opportunities GAI presents and be experimental, creative, and courageous in their teaching practice. They discuss their findings in the context of the TPACK framework for technology integration in HCI education.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights on the use of GAI in HCI education, acknowledging both the potential benefits and the need to address potential pitfalls. However, the study is limited to a single 10-week module, and the authors acknowledge that more research is needed to fully understand the long-term impacts and best practices for incorporating GAI into HCI curricula.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific GAI models used or their technical capabilities, which could be helpful for educators looking to replicate the study or explore GAI in their own teaching. The researchers also do not address potential ethical considerations or the implications of students using GAI in their design work.

Overall, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the role of GAI in HCI education, but further research and discussion are needed to fully explore the opportunities and challenges it presents.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the growing influence of generative AI in HCI education and the need for educators to proactively address its implications. The researchers' insights suggest that GAI can be a valuable tool for ideation, resource creation, and assessing student understanding, but educators must also be mindful of potential pitfalls and ensure students develop critical digital literacies.

The authors encourage HCI educators to embrace the opportunities presented by GAI and be experimental, creative, and courageous in their teaching practices. As generative AI continues to evolve, this paper provides a useful starting point for understanding its role in shaping the future of HCI education.