MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) quickly become outdated as new information emerges.
• Retraining these models from scratch is often not feasible.
• Techniques for injecting new facts by updating model weights have recently emerged.
• Current evaluation methods focus only on the recall of edited facts.
• Changing one fact should lead to rippling changes in the model's related beliefs.

Plain English Explanation

<internal-link>Large language models</internal-link> are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. However, the information stored in these models can become outdated quickly as the world changes. Retraining these models from scratch is often not practical, so researchers have developed techniques to update the models with new information by adjusting the internal weights.

The problem is that current methods for evaluating these knowledge-editing techniques only look at whether the models can accurately recall the specific facts that were changed. But in the real world, changing one fact should have a ripple effect, causing changes to the model's related beliefs. For example, if you change the identity of the UK Prime Minister, the model should also give a different answer to the question "Who is married to the British Prime Minister?"

To address this, the researchers have created a new benchmark called <internal-link>MQuAKE (Multi-hop Question Answering for Knowledge Editing)</internal-link>. This benchmark tests whether knowledge-edited models can correctly answer multi-step questions where the answer should change as a consequence of the edited facts.

The researchers found that current knowledge-editing approaches can accurately recall edited facts but fail badly on the MQuAKE multi-hop questions. To address this, they propose a new technique called <internal-link>MeLLo</internal-link>, which stores all edited facts externally and uses an iterative process to generate answers that are consistent with the updated information. MeLLo is able to scale well to large language models like GPT-3.5-turbo and outperforms previous knowledge-editing methods.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed <internal-link>MQuAKE</internal-link>, a benchmark that assesses whether knowledge-edited language models can correctly answer multi-hop questions where the answer should change as a consequence of the edited facts. MQuAKE comprises a set of multi-step questions that require reasoning about relationships between concepts.

To evaluate existing knowledge-editing techniques, the researchers applied several approaches, including <internal-link>retrieval-enhanced</internal-link> and <internal-link>memory-based</internal-link> methods, to update a base language model with new facts. They found that while these methods could accurately recall the edited facts, they performed poorly on the multi-hop questions in MQuAKE, often giving answers that were inconsistent with the updated knowledge.

To address this shortcoming, the researchers proposed <internal-link>MeLLo</internal-link>, a simple memory-based approach that stores all edited facts externally and uses an iterative process to generate answers that are consistent with the updated information. MeLLo was able to scale well to large language models like GPT-3.5-turbo and significantly outperformed previous knowledge-editing techniques on the MQuAKE benchmark.

Critical Analysis

The MQuAKE benchmark is a valuable contribution, as it highlights the limitations of current knowledge-editing approaches. The researchers rightly point out that simply validating the recall of edited facts is an incomplete metric, as changing one fact should have downstream effects on a model's related beliefs.

However, the MQuAKE benchmark itself may have some limitations. The researchers do not provide detailed information about the specific multi-hop questions used, making it difficult to assess the breadth and complexity of the reasoning required. Additionally, the benchmark is focused on English-language models, and it would be interesting to see how knowledge-editing techniques perform on multilingual benchmarks.

The proposed <internal-link>MeLLo</internal-link> approach is a promising solution, but it remains to be seen how it would scale to larger and more complex language models. The researchers also do not address potential issues with the external storage of edited facts, such as the security and privacy implications of maintaining a separate knowledge base.

Conclusion

This research highlights the importance of moving beyond simple fact-based evaluations of knowledge-editing techniques for large language models. The <internal-link>MQuAKE</internal-link> benchmark provides a more comprehensive way to assess whether updated models can correctly reason about the downstream consequences of edited facts.

The researchers' proposed <internal-link>MeLLo</internal-link> approach shows promise, but further work is needed to address the scalability and practical deployment challenges of knowledge-editing systems. As large language models become increasingly ubiquitous, developing robust and reliable methods for maintaining their knowledge will be a critical area of research.