MSDiagnosis: An EMR-based Dataset for Clinical Multi-Step Diagnosis
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a new dataset called MSDiagnosis for studying multi-step diagnosis in clinical settings.
- The dataset is extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) and covers various clinical conditions and the steps taken by physicians to arrive at a final diagnosis.
- The paper also outlines a problem formulation for the multi-step diagnosis task and discusses potential applications and challenges.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have created a new dataset called MSDiagnosis that is designed to help study how doctors diagnose patients in a step-by-step process. This dataset is based on real-world medical records, and it covers a wide range of different health conditions and the various steps that doctors take to figure out what's wrong with a patient.
The key idea behind this dataset is to better understand the diagnostic process, which often involves gathering information, running tests, and considering multiple possible explanations before arriving at a final diagnosis. By having this data available, researchers and developers can work on building AI systems that can assist doctors in this complex process, potentially leading to faster and more accurate diagnoses.
The paper also lays out a specific way of framing the multi-step diagnosis problem, which involves predicting the sequence of steps a doctor might take based on the initial information available. This could have important applications, such as helping doctors streamline their workflow or flagging potential issues that might be missed in the diagnostic process.
Technical Explanation
The researchers introduce the MSDiagnosis dataset, which is extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) and contains information about the multi-step diagnostic process for various clinical conditions. 1 The dataset includes details such as the patient's initial symptoms, the tests or examinations performed, and the final diagnosis.
To formulate the multi-step diagnosis problem, the researchers define it as a sequence prediction task. 2 Given the initial patient information, the goal is to predict the sequence of diagnostic steps that a physician would take to arrive at the final diagnosis. This could involve predicting the order of tests, the hypotheses considered, and the final conclusion.
The researchers discuss several potential applications of this problem formulation, such as providing decision support to physicians, helping to identify gaps in the diagnostic process, and training AI systems to assist in clinical decision-making. 2 They also acknowledge the challenges involved, such as the complex and contextual nature of the diagnostic process and the potential for bias in the dataset.
Critical Analysis
The researchers highlight several important caveats and limitations of the MSDiagnosis dataset and the multi-step diagnosis problem formulation. 2 For example, the dataset may not fully capture the nuances and uncertainties inherent in real-world clinical decision-making, and the diagnostic steps recorded in EMRs may not always reflect the complete thought process of the physician.
Additionally, the researchers note that the dataset may be biased towards certain demographic groups or clinical settings, which could limit the generalizability of any models trained on it. 2 They encourage further research to address these limitations and explore ways to make the dataset and problem formulation more representative and inclusive.
Another potential concern is the ethical implications of using AI systems for clinical decision-making, particularly if they are not transparent or accountable. The researchers do not delve into these issues in depth, but they highlight the importance of developing responsible and trustworthy AI systems for healthcare applications.
Conclusion
The MSDiagnosis dataset and the multi-step diagnosis problem formulation presented in this paper represent an important step towards better understanding and supporting the complex clinical decision-making process. 1 By providing a rich dataset and a well-defined problem, the researchers hope to catalyze further research and innovation in this area, potentially leading to improved diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and equity in healthcare.
The successful development of AI-powered decision support systems for multi-step diagnosis could have significant implications, both for the medical profession and for the patients they serve. However, the researchers emphasize the need to address the limitations and ethical considerations surrounding the use of such systems to ensure they are developed and deployed responsibly.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MSDiagnosis: An EMR-based Dataset for Clinical Multi-Step Diagnosis
Ruihui Hou, Shencheng Chen, Yongqi Fan, Lifeng Zhu, Jing Sun, Jingping Liu, Tong Ruan
Clinical diagnosis is critical in medical practice, typically requiring a continuous and evolving process that includes primary diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and final diagnosis. However, most existing clinical diagnostic tasks are single-step processes, which does not align with the complex multi-step diagnostic procedures found in real-world clinical settings. In this paper, we propose a multi-step diagnostic task and annotate a clinical diagnostic dataset (MSDiagnosis). This dataset includes primary diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and final diagnosis questions. Additionally, we propose a novel and effective framework. This framework combines forward inference, backward inference, reflection, and refinement, enabling the LLM to self-evaluate and adjust its diagnostic results. To assess the effectiveness of our proposed method, we design and conduct extensive experiments. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. We also provide a comprehensive experimental analysis and suggest future research directions for this task.
Read more8/30/2024
0
MDS-ED: Multimodal Decision Support in the Emergency Department -- a Benchmark Dataset for Diagnoses and Deterioration Prediction in Emergency Medicine
Juan Miguel Lopez Alcaraz, Hjalmar Bouma, Nils Strodthoff
Background: Benchmarking medical decision support algorithms often struggles due to limited access to datasets, narrow prediction tasks, and restricted input modalities. These limitations affect their clinical relevance and performance in high-stakes areas like emergency care, complicating replication, validation, and improvement of benchmarks. Methods: We introduce a dataset based on MIMIC-IV, benchmarking protocol, and initial results for evaluating multimodal decision support in the emergency department (ED). We use diverse data modalities from the first 1.5 hours of patient arrival, including demographics, biometrics, vital signs, lab values, and electrocardiogram waveforms. We analyze 1443 clinical labels across two contexts: predicting diagnoses with ICD-10 codes and forecasting patient deterioration. Results: Our multimodal diagnostic model achieves an AUROC score over 0.8 in a statistically significant manner for 357 out of 1428 conditions, including cardiac issues like myocardial infarction and non-cardiac conditions such as renal disease and diabetes. The deterioration model scores above 0.8 in a statistically significant manner for 13 out of 15 targets, including critical events like cardiac arrest and mechanical ventilation, ICU admission as well as short- and long-term mortality. Incorporating raw waveform data significantly improves model performance, which represents one of the first robust demonstrations of this effect. Conclusions: This study highlights the uniqueness of our dataset, which encompasses a wide range of clinical tasks and utilizes a comprehensive set of features collected early during the emergency after arriving at the ED. The strong performance, as evidenced by high AUROC scores across diagnostic and deterioration targets, underscores the potential of our approach to revolutionize decision-making in acute and emergency medicine.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Automatic Differential Diagnosis using Transformer-Based Multi-Label Sequence Classification
Abu Adnan Sadi, Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Lubaba Binte Saber
As the field of artificial intelligence progresses, assistive technologies are becoming more widely used across all industries. The healthcare industry is no different, with numerous studies being done to develop assistive tools for healthcare professionals. Automatic diagnostic systems are one such beneficial tool that can assist with a variety of tasks, including collecting patient information, analyzing test results, and diagnosing patients. However, the idea of developing systems that can provide a differential diagnosis has been largely overlooked in most of these research studies. In this study, we propose a transformer-based approach for providing differential diagnoses based on a patient's age, sex, medical history, and symptoms. We use the DDXPlus dataset, which provides differential diagnosis information for patients based on 49 disease types. Firstly, we propose a method to process the tabular patient data from the dataset and engineer them into patient reports to make them suitable for our research. In addition, we introduce two data modification modules to diversify the training data and consequently improve the robustness of the models. We approach the task as a multi-label classification problem and conduct extensive experiments using four transformer models. All the models displayed promising results by achieving over 97% F1 score on the held-out test set. Moreover, we design additional behavioral tests to get a broader understanding of the models. In particular, for one of our test cases, we prepared a custom test set of 100 samples with the assistance of a doctor. The results on the custom set showed that our proposed data modification modules improved the model's generalization capabilities. We hope our findings will provide future researchers with valuable insights and inspire them to develop reliable systems for automatic differential diagnosis.
Read more8/29/2024
0
CliBench: Multifaceted Evaluation of Large Language Models in Clinical Decisions on Diagnoses, Procedures, Lab Tests Orders and Prescriptions
Mingyu Derek Ma, Chenchen Ye, Yu Yan, Xiaoxuan Wang, Peipei Ping, Timothy S Chang, Wei Wang
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially Large Language Models (LLMs), into the clinical diagnosis process offers significant potential to improve the efficiency and accessibility of medical care. While LLMs have shown some promise in the medical domain, their application in clinical diagnosis remains underexplored, especially in real-world clinical practice, where highly sophisticated, patient-specific decisions need to be made. Current evaluations of LLMs in this field are often narrow in scope, focusing on specific diseases or specialties and employing simplified diagnostic tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce CliBench, a novel benchmark developed from the MIMIC IV dataset, offering a comprehensive and realistic assessment of LLMs' capabilities in clinical diagnosis. This benchmark not only covers diagnoses from a diverse range of medical cases across various specialties but also incorporates tasks of clinical significance: treatment procedure identification, lab test ordering and medication prescriptions. Supported by structured output ontologies, CliBench enables a precise and multi-granular evaluation, offering an in-depth understanding of LLM's capability on diverse clinical tasks of desired granularity. We conduct a zero-shot evaluation of leading LLMs to assess their proficiency in clinical decision-making. Our preliminary results shed light on the potential and limitations of current LLMs in clinical settings, providing valuable insights for future advancements in LLM-powered healthcare.
Read more6/17/2024