Multi-Label Learning with Stronger Consistency Guarantees

Read original: arXiv:2407.13746 - Published 7/19/2024 by Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper introduces a new approach for multi-label learning, which aims to predict multiple labels for a given input. • The key idea is to enforce stronger consistency guarantees during the learning process, which can lead to improved performance. • The paper presents theoretical analyses and empirical evaluations to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed method.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world problems, a single input (e.g., an image or a document) can be associated with multiple labels or categories. This is known as multi-label learning. For example, a news article could be labeled as being about "politics," "economics," and "international relations."

The paper proposes a new way to approach multi-label learning that can lead to better performance. The main idea is to enforce stronger consistency during the learning process. Consistency means that the model's predictions should be stable and coherent when the input is slightly modified.

By enforcing stronger consistency, the model can learn more robust and generalized representations, which can ultimately improve its ability to predict multiple labels accurately. The paper provides theoretical analyses and experimental results to support the effectiveness of this approach.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new consistent surrogate loss function for multi-label learning, which can be optimized using gradient-based methods. The proposed loss function is designed to satisfy stronger consistency guarantees, which means that the model's predictions should be more stable and coherent when the input is slightly perturbed.

The authors provide theoretical analyses to show that the proposed loss function is realizable-$\mathcal{H}$-consistent and has universal growth rate learning properties. These properties ensure that the model can learn the optimal Bayes-consistent predictor under certain conditions.

Empirically, the authors evaluate the proposed method on several benchmark multi-label learning datasets and compare it to state-of-the-art approaches, such as Boosting for Single-Positive Multi-Label Classification and Adversarial Consistency for Uniqueness of Adversarial Bayes Classifier. The results demonstrate the advantages of the proposed consistent surrogate loss function in terms of both predictive performance and consistency guarantees.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a solid theoretical foundation for the proposed consistent surrogate loss function and demonstrates its empirical effectiveness. However, the authors do not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the approach.

One potential issue is the computational complexity of the proposed method, as enforcing stronger consistency may require additional computational resources during training. The authors could have investigated the trade-offs between the consistency guarantees and the training time or memory requirements.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the robustness of the proposed method to label noise or imbalanced datasets, which are common challenges in real-world multi-label learning scenarios. Further research could assess the sensitivity of the method to such issues and explore potential remedies.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to multi-label learning that enforces stronger consistency guarantees during the learning process. The authors provide theoretical analyses and empirical evaluations to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed consistent surrogate loss function.

The key contribution of this work is the introduction of a principled way to improve the consistency and generalization of multi-label learning models. This approach has the potential to lead to more robust and reliable predictors, which can be valuable in a wide range of applications, such as document categorization, image annotation, and medical diagnosis.

Overall, the paper makes a significant advancement in the field of multi-label learning and provides a foundation for further research in this direction.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Multi-Label Learning with Stronger Consistency Guarantees

Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong

We present a detailed study of surrogate losses and algorithms for multi-label learning, supported by $H$-consistency bounds. We first show that, for the simplest form of multi-label loss (the popular Hamming loss), the well-known consistent binary relevance surrogate suffers from a sub-optimal dependency on the number of labels in terms of $H$-consistency bounds, when using smooth losses such as logistic losses. Furthermore, this loss function fails to account for label correlations. To address these drawbacks, we introduce a novel surrogate loss, multi-label logistic loss, that accounts for label correlations and benefits from label-independent $H$-consistency bounds. We then broaden our analysis to cover a more extensive family of multi-label losses, including all common ones and a new extension defined based on linear-fractional functions with respect to the confusion matrix. We also extend our multi-label logistic losses to more comprehensive multi-label comp-sum losses, adapting comp-sum losses from standard classification to the multi-label learning. We prove that this family of surrogate losses benefits from $H$-consistency bounds, and thus Bayes-consistency, across any general multi-label loss. Our work thus proposes a unified surrogate loss framework benefiting from strong consistency guarantees for any multi-label loss, significantly expanding upon previous work which only established Bayes-consistency and for specific loss functions. Additionally, we adapt constrained losses from standard classification to multi-label constrained losses in a similar way, which also benefit from $H$-consistency bounds and thus Bayes-consistency for any multi-label loss. We further describe efficient gradient computation algorithms for minimizing the multi-label logistic loss.

Read more

7/19/2024

Total Score

0

Enhanced $H$-Consistency Bounds

Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong

Recent research has introduced a key notion of $H$-consistency bounds for surrogate losses. These bounds offer finite-sample guarantees, quantifying the relationship between the zero-one estimation error (or other target loss) and the surrogate loss estimation error for a specific hypothesis set. However, previous bounds were derived under the condition that a lower bound of the surrogate loss conditional regret is given as a convex function of the target conditional regret, without non-constant factors depending on the predictor or input instance. Can we derive finer and more favorable $H$-consistency bounds? In this work, we relax this condition and present a general framework for establishing enhanced $H$-consistency bounds based on more general inequalities relating conditional regrets. Our theorems not only subsume existing results as special cases but also enable the derivation of more favorable bounds in various scenarios. These include standard multi-class classification, binary and multi-class classification under Tsybakov noise conditions, and bipartite ranking.

Read more

7/19/2024

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

Realizable $H$-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to Defer

Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong

We present a comprehensive study of surrogate loss functions for learning to defer. We introduce a broad family of surrogate losses, parameterized by a non-increasing function $Psi$, and establish their realizable $H$-consistency under mild conditions. For cost functions based on classification error, we further show that these losses admit $H$-consistency bounds when the hypothesis set is symmetric and complete, a property satisfied by common neural network and linear function hypothesis sets. Our results also resolve an open question raised in previous work (Mozannar et al., 2023) by proving the realizable $H$-consistency and Bayes-consistency of a specific surrogate loss. Furthermore, we identify choices of $Psi$ that lead to $H$-consistent surrogate losses for any general cost function, thus achieving Bayes-consistency, realizable $H$-consistency, and $H$-consistency bounds simultaneously. We also investigate the relationship between $H$-consistency bounds and realizable $H$-consistency in learning to defer, highlighting key differences from standard classification. Finally, we empirically evaluate our proposed surrogate losses and compare them with existing baselines.

Read more

7/19/2024

A Universal Growth Rate for Learning with Smooth Surrogate Losses
Total Score

0

A Universal Growth Rate for Learning with Smooth Surrogate Losses

Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the growth rate of $H$-consistency bounds (and excess error bounds) for various surrogate losses used in classification. We prove a square-root growth rate near zero for smooth margin-based surrogate losses in binary classification, providing both upper and lower bounds under mild assumptions. This result also translates to excess error bounds. Our lower bound requires weaker conditions than those in previous work for excess error bounds, and our upper bound is entirely novel. Moreover, we extend this analysis to multi-class classification with a series of novel results, demonstrating a universal square-root growth rate for smooth comp-sum and constrained losses, covering common choices for training neural networks in multi-class classification. Given this universal rate, we turn to the question of choosing among different surrogate losses. We first examine how $H$-consistency bounds vary across surrogates based on the number of classes. Next, ignoring constants and focusing on behavior near zero, we identify minimizability gaps as the key differentiating factor in these bounds. Thus, we thoroughly analyze these gaps, to guide surrogate loss selection, covering: comparisons across different comp-sum losses, conditions where gaps become zero, and general conditions leading to small gaps. Additionally, we demonstrate the key role of minimizability gaps in comparing excess error bounds and $H$-consistency bounds.

Read more

7/9/2024