Realizable $H$-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to Defer

Overview

• The paper presents a comprehensive study of surrogate loss functions for learning to defer.
• The authors introduce a broad family of surrogate losses parameterized by a non-increasing function $Psi$.
• They establish the realizable H-consistency of these losses under mild conditions.
• For cost functions based on classification error, the authors show that these losses admit H-consistency bounds when the hypothesis set is symmetric and complete.
• The results also resolve an open question from previous work by proving the realizable H-consistency and Bayes-consistency of a specific surrogate loss.
• The authors identify choices of $Psi$ that lead to H-consistent surrogate losses for any general cost function, achieving Bayes-consistency, realizable H-consistency, and H-consistency bounds simultaneously.
• The paper investigates the relationship between H-consistency bounds and realizable H-consistency in learning to defer, highlighting key differences from standard classification.
• The authors empirically evaluate their proposed surrogate losses and compare them with existing baselines.

Plain English Explanation

This paper explores techniques for training AI systems to

- i.e., to recognize when they are uncertain and should not make a prediction. The researchers introduce a broad family of "surrogate loss functions" that can be used to train these AI systems. Surrogate loss functions are a way of simplifying the training process by replacing a complex objective (like minimizing classification errors) with a simpler, easier-to-optimize objective.

The key idea is that the researchers parameterize these surrogate loss functions using a special mathematical function called $Psi$. They show that under certain conditions, these surrogate losses will lead the AI system to learn in a way that is consistent with the true, underlying objective - in other words, the AI will learn to defer appropriately.

For the common case where the AI system is trying to minimize classification errors, the researchers further demonstrate that these surrogate losses will provide strong performance guarantees as long as the space of possible AI models (the "hypothesis set") has certain desirable properties.

The paper also resolves an open question from previous work, proving that a specific surrogate loss is both realizable H-consistent and Bayes-consistent. Additionally, the researchers identify choices of $Psi$ that lead to H-consistent surrogate losses for any general cost function, achieving all the desired consistency properties at once.

Finally, the paper explores the relationship between different types of consistency guarantees in the context of learning to defer, and presents experimental results evaluating the proposed surrogate losses.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a broad family of surrogate loss functions for learning to defer, parameterized by a non-increasing function $Psi$. The authors establish the realizable H-consistency of these losses under mild conditions. For cost functions based on classification error, they further show that these losses admit H-consistency bounds when the hypothesis set is symmetric and complete, a property satisfied by common neural network and linear function hypothesis sets.

The results also resolve an open question raised in previous work (Mozannar et al., 2023) by proving the realizable H-consistency and Bayes-consistency of a specific surrogate loss. Furthermore, the authors identify choices of $Psi$ that lead to H-consistent surrogate losses for any general cost function, thus achieving Bayes-consistency, realizable H-consistency, and H-consistency bounds simultaneously.

The paper investigates the relationship between H-consistency bounds and realizable H-consistency in learning to defer, highlighting key differences from standard classification. Finally, the authors empirically evaluate their proposed surrogate losses and compare them with existing baselines.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive theoretical analysis of surrogate loss functions for learning to defer, with a focus on establishing various consistency guarantees. The authors carefully consider the properties of the hypothesis set and the choice of $Psi$ function to derive H-consistency bounds and realizable H-consistency results.

One potential limitation of the work is that the theoretical analysis assumes the existence of a realizable hypothesis, which may not always hold in practice. Additionally, the paper does not provide extensive empirical evaluations to validate the practical performance of the proposed surrogate losses compared to existing baselines.

Further research could explore the sensitivity of the proposed surrogate losses to hyperparameter choices, as well as their robustness to distribution shift or other real-world challenges. It would also be valuable to investigate the computational and memory efficiency of the proposed approaches, as these factors can be crucial for deploying learning to defer systems in practical applications.

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to the theoretical understanding of surrogate losses for learning to defer, providing a unifying framework that achieves strong consistency guarantees. The results can serve as a foundation for further advancements in this important area of machine learning.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive study of surrogate loss functions for learning to defer, a crucial capability for building robust and trustworthy AI systems. The authors introduce a broad family of surrogate losses parameterized by a non-increasing function $Psi$, and establish their realizable H-consistency under mild conditions. For classification error-based cost functions, they further show that these losses admit H-consistency bounds when the hypothesis set has desirable properties.

The paper also resolves an open question by proving the realizable H-consistency and Bayes-consistency of a specific surrogate loss, and identifies choices of $Psi$ that lead to H-consistent surrogate losses for any general cost function. This work advances the theoretical understanding of learning to defer and provides a foundation for developing more reliable and accountable AI systems.