Multi-Objective Recommendation via Multivariate Policy Learning

Overview

• Real-world recommender systems must balance multiple objectives, including user behavior signals and broader goals like diversity and fairness.
• Scalarization methods, which use a weighted average of per-objective reward signals to determine the final ranking score, are commonly used to handle this balancing task.
• This paper frames the computation of scalarization weights as a decision-making task, where the goal is to maximize an overall "North Star" reward (e.g., long-term user retention or growth).
• The authors propose an approach that extends existing policy learning methods to the continuous multivariate action domain, aiming to maximize a pessimistic lower bound on the North Star reward.

Plain English Explanation

Recommender systems, the algorithms that suggest products or content to users, often need to balance multiple competing goals. For example, they may need to consider user engagement signals like clicks and time spent, as well as broader objectives like providing diverse recommendations or ensuring fairness.

Commonly, recommender systems use a scalarization method to combine these different objectives into a single score that determines the final ranking of recommended items. Scalarization involves calculating a weighted average of the various reward signals, where the weights determine the relative importance of each objective.

This paper views the process of setting these scalarization weights as a decision-making problem. The goal is to find the set of weights that will maximize an overarching "North Star" metric, such as long-term user retention or platform growth. The authors propose an approach that builds on existing policy learning methods to efficiently optimize these weights in a way that robustly maximizes the North Star reward.

The key innovation is the use of a pessimistic lower bound on the North Star reward, which helps the system make conservative decisions that are less vulnerable to uncertainty or unforeseen circumstances. This is an important consideration for real-world recommender systems, which often operate in complex, dynamic environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for multi-objective policy learning in the context of recommender systems. The authors formulate the problem as a decision-making task, where the goal is to learn a policy that determines the scalarization weights used to combine different reward signals (e.g., user engagement, diversity, fairness) into a single "North Star" metric.

To solve this problem, the authors extend existing policy learning methods to the continuous, multivariate action domain. They propose maximizing a pessimistic lower bound on the North Star reward, which helps the system make robust decisions that are less vulnerable to uncertainty.

Typical lower bound approaches based on normal approximations often suffer from insufficient coverage, so the authors introduce an efficient and effective policy-dependent correction to address this issue. They also provide guidance on designing stochastic data collection policies and highly sensitive reward signals to support the learning process.

The paper presents empirical observations from simulations, offline experiments, and online deployments, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The results highlight the importance of balancing multiple objectives in real-world recommender systems and the potential benefits of the authors' decision-making framework.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and compelling approach to the challenge of multi-objective optimization in recommender systems. The use of a pessimistic lower bound to guide the policy learning process is a sensible and robust strategy, addressing the limitations of more traditional methods.

One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on accurate modeling of the North Star reward function and its relationship to the individual objective signals. In practice, these relationships may be complex and difficult to capture precisely, which could impact the effectiveness of the optimization process.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific tradeoffs or potential unintended consequences of optimizing for the North Star reward. There may be instances where maximizing this high-level metric could lead to suboptimal outcomes for certain user segments or aspects of the recommender system's performance.

Further research could explore ways to incorporate more nuanced multi-objective optimization techniques, such as Pareto-efficient frontiers, to better capture the inherent tradeoffs and ensure a more balanced approach.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for multi-objective policy learning in the context of real-world recommender systems. By framing the computation of scalarization weights as a decision-making task and proposing an approach that maximizes a pessimistic lower bound on the North Star reward, the authors offer a robust and effective solution to a critical challenge facing many online platforms.

The technical insights and empirical observations provided in the paper highlight the importance of balancing multiple objectives, such as user engagement, diversity, and fairness, when designing recommender systems. The authors' work lays the groundwork for further advancements in this area, which could have significant implications for improving the user experience and driving long-term platform growth.