Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization
2404.18490
0
0
Abstract
Evaluating the causal impacts of possible interventions is crucial for informing decision-making, especially towards improving access to opportunity. However, if causal effects are heterogeneous and predictable from covariates, personalized treatment decisions can improve individual outcomes and contribute to both efficiency and equity. In practice, however, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori and often collect multiple outcomes of interest that are noisy estimates of the true target of interest. For example, in government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty. The ultimate goal is to learn an optimal treatment policy that in some sense maximizes multiple outcomes simultaneously. To address such issues, we present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning with multiple objectives. We learn a low-dimensional representation of the true outcome from the observed outcomes using reduced rank regression. We develop a suite of estimates that use the model to denoise observed outcomes, including commonly-used index weightings. These methods improve estimation error in policy evaluation and optimization, including on a case study of real-world cash transfer and social intervention data. Reducing the variance of noisy social outcomes can improve the performance of algorithmic allocations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach for learning and optimizing reduced-rank multi-objective policies.
- It addresses the challenge of learning effective policies in complex environments with multiple, potentially conflicting objectives.
- The proposed method aims to learn a low-dimensional representation of the policy that can effectively balance the trade-offs between different objectives.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world situations, we need to make decisions that involve balancing multiple, sometimes competing, goals. For example, when designing a public transportation system, we might want to minimize travel time, reduce emissions, and ensure accessibility for all users. Traditionally, this type of "multi-objective" decision-making has been very challenging, as it can be difficult to find a single solution that optimizes all the objectives at the same time.
The researchers in this paper introduce a new approach to tackle this problem. Their key insight is that we don't always need to find a single, complex policy that tries to optimize every objective perfectly. Instead, we can learn a simpler, "reduced-rank" policy that focuses on the most important trade-offs between the objectives. This reduced-rank policy can be easier to learn and understand, while still effectively balancing the different goals.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several challenging simulated environments, showing that it can outperform traditional multi-objective optimization methods. By using this reduced-rank approach, they're able to find policies that strike a good balance between the various objectives, without getting bogged down in the full complexity of the problem.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the field of multi-objective reinforcement learning, which aims to develop AI systems that can reason about and optimize for multiple, sometimes conflicting, objectives. As AI becomes more widely deployed in real-world decision-making scenarios, techniques like this will be crucial for ensuring that these systems can effectively balance the different priorities and constraints that stakeholders care about.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contributions of this paper are:
-
Reduced-Rank Policy Representation: The authors propose a novel policy representation that factorizes the policy into a low-dimensional "reduced-rank" component and a high-dimensional "task-specific" component. This allows the policy to learn a concise representation of the trade-offs between different objectives, while still maintaining the flexibility to adapt to specific tasks.
-
Multi-Objective Policy Optimization: The authors develop a policy optimization algorithm that can efficiently learn the reduced-rank policy by jointly optimizing for multiple objectives. This involves solving a constrained optimization problem to find the optimal balance between the objectives.
-
Experimental Evaluation: The authors evaluate their approach on several simulated multi-objective environments, including navigation tasks, robotic control problems, and decision-making scenarios. They show that their reduced-rank policy can outperform traditional multi-objective optimization methods in terms of both performance and interpretability.
The key technical insight behind the reduced-rank policy representation is that many real-world decision-making problems have an underlying low-dimensional structure, even if the full problem is high-dimensional. By learning this low-dimensional representation, the policy can effectively balance the different objectives without getting bogged down in unnecessary complexity.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of multi-objective reinforcement learning by providing a principled way to learn and optimize policies that can effectively navigate the trade-offs between multiple, potentially conflicting objectives.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of this approach is that the reduced-rank representation may not be able to capture all the nuances of the multi-objective problem, particularly in highly complex environments. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to understand the limitations of this approach and how it can be extended to more challenging scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not address the issue of causal representation learning, which could be important for ensuring the learned policies generalize well to new situations. Incorporating causal reasoning into the multi-objective policy learning framework could be an interesting direction for future work.
Overall, this paper presents a promising approach for tackling the challenging problem of multi-objective policy optimization. The reduced-rank policy representation and optimization algorithm provide a compelling way to balance multiple, potentially conflicting objectives in a principled and effective manner.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach for learning and optimizing reduced-rank multi-objective policies. By factorizing the policy into a low-dimensional "reduced-rank" component and a high-dimensional "task-specific" component, the authors are able to effectively balance the trade-offs between multiple objectives while maintaining a concise and interpretable policy representation.
The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a variety of simulated multi-objective environments, suggesting that it could be a valuable tool for real-world decision-making scenarios where multiple, potentially conflicting objectives need to be considered. As AI systems become more widely deployed in complex, high-stakes domains, techniques like this will be crucial for ensuring that these systems can make decisions that effectively balance the different priorities and constraints of various stakeholders.
While the paper identifies some potential limitations and areas for future research, the core ideas presented here represent an important step forward in the field of multi-objective reinforcement learning. By providing a principled way to learn and optimize reduced-rank policies, this work opens up new possibilities for developing AI systems that can navigate the nuanced trade-offs inherent in many real-world decision-making problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
Multi-Objective Recommendation via Multivariate Policy Learning
Olivier Jeunen, Jatin Mandav, Ivan Potapov, Nakul Agarwal, Sourabh Vaid, Wenzhe Shi, Aleksei Ustimenko
0
0
Real-world recommender systems often need to balance multiple objectives when deciding which recommendations to present to users. These include behavioural signals (e.g. clicks, shares, dwell time), as well as broader objectives (e.g. diversity, fairness). Scalarisation methods are commonly used to handle this balancing task, where a weighted average of per-objective reward signals determines the final score used for ranking. Naturally, how these weights are computed exactly, is key to success for any online platform. We frame this as a decision-making task, where the scalarisation weights are actions taken to maximise an overall North Star reward (e.g. long-term user retention or growth). We extend existing policy learning methods to the continuous multivariate action domain, proposing to maximise a pessimistic lower bound on the North Star reward that the learnt policy will yield. Typical lower bounds based on normal approximations suffer from insufficient coverage, and we propose an efficient and effective policy-dependent correction for this. We provide guidance to design stochastic data collection policies, as well as highly sensitive reward signals. Empirical observations from simulations, offline and online experiments highlight the efficacy of our deployed approach.
5/6/2024
Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline
Peng Li, Lixia Wu, Chaoqun Feng, Haoyuan Hu, Lei Fu, Jieping Ye
0
0
Real-world scenarios frequently involve multi-objective data-driven optimization problems, characterized by unknown problem coefficients and multiple conflicting objectives. Traditional two-stage methods independently apply a machine learning model to estimate problem coefficients, followed by invoking a solver to tackle the predicted optimization problem. The independent use of optimization solvers and prediction models may lead to suboptimal performance due to mismatches between their objectives. Recent efforts have focused on end-to-end training of predictive models that use decision loss derived from the downstream optimization problem. However, these methods have primarily focused on single-objective optimization problems, thus limiting their applicability. We aim to propose a multi-objective decision-focused approach to address this gap. In order to better align with the inherent properties of multi-objective optimization problems, we propose a set of novel loss functions. These loss functions are designed to capture the discrepancies between predicted and true decision problems, considering solution space, objective space, and decision quality, named landscape loss, Pareto set loss, and decision loss, respectively. Our experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms traditional two-stage methods and most current decision-focused methods.
6/4/2024
🎲
Metalearners for Ranking Treatment Effects
Toon Vanderschueren, Wouter Verbeke, Felipe Moraes, Hugo Manuel Proenc{c}a
0
0
Efficiently allocating treatments with a budget constraint constitutes an important challenge across various domains. In marketing, for example, the use of promotions to target potential customers and boost conversions is limited by the available budget. While much research focuses on estimating causal effects, there is relatively limited work on learning to allocate treatments while considering the operational context. Existing methods for uplift modeling or causal inference primarily estimate treatment effects, without considering how this relates to a profit maximizing allocation policy that respects budget constraints. The potential downside of using these methods is that the resulting predictive model is not aligned with the operational context. Therefore, prediction errors are propagated to the optimization of the budget allocation problem, subsequently leading to a suboptimal allocation policy. We propose an alternative approach based on learning to rank. Our proposed methodology directly learns an allocation policy by prioritizing instances in terms of their incremental profit. We propose an efficient sampling procedure for the optimization of the ranking model to scale our methodology to large-scale data sets. Theoretically, we show how learning to rank can maximize the area under a policy's incremental profit curve. Empirically, we validate our methodology and show its effectiveness in practice through a series of experiments on both synthetic and real-world data.
5/6/2024
Coupled Input-Output Dimension Reduction: Application to Goal-oriented Bayesian Experimental Design and Global Sensitivity Analysis
Qiao Chen, Elise Arnaud, Ricardo Baptista, Olivier Zahm
0
0
We introduce a new method to jointly reduce the dimension of the input and output space of a high-dimensional function. Choosing a reduced input subspace influences which output subspace is relevant and vice versa. Conventional methods focus on reducing either the input or output space, even though both are often reduced simultaneously in practice. Our coupled approach naturally supports goal-oriented dimension reduction, where either an input or output quantity of interest is prescribed. We consider, in particular, goal-oriented sensor placement and goal-oriented sensitivity analysis, which can be viewed as dimension reduction where the most important output or, respectively, input components are chosen. Both applications present difficult combinatorial optimization problems with expensive objectives such as the expected information gain and Sobol indices. By optimizing gradient-based bounds, we can determine the most informative sensors and most sensitive parameters as the largest diagonal entries of some diagnostic matrices, thus bypassing the combinatorial optimization and objective evaluation.
6/21/2024