Multi-scale Wasserstein Shortest-path Graph Kernels for Graph Classification

Overview

• Existing graph kernels, like R-convolution graph kernels, struggle with two key challenges: 1) Comparing graphs at multiple scales, and 2) Considering the distributions of substructures when computing the kernel matrix.
• To address these challenges, the researchers propose a new graph kernel called the Multi-scale Wasserstein Shortest-Path graph kernel (MWSP).
• The core of MWSP is the multi-scale shortest-path node feature map, which captures the number of occurrences of shortest paths around each node.
• MWSP incorporates multiple graph scales by using truncated BFS trees of different depths rooted at each node.
• The Wasserstein distance is used to compute the similarity between the multi-scale shortest-path node feature maps of two graphs, considering the distributions of shortest paths.

Plain English Explanation

Graph kernels are methods for measuring the similarity between different graphs, which are mathematical structures that can represent complex relationships. However, the existing graph kernels have two key limitations:

1. Comparing graphs at multiple scales: They can only compare graphs at a single, fixed scale, but real-world graphs often have structures and patterns that exist at different scales.

2. Considering the distribution of substructures: They don't fully account for how the different substructures (like paths or clusters) are distributed within the graphs when computing the similarity.

To address these limitations, the researchers developed a new graph kernel called the Multi-scale Wasserstein Shortest-Path graph kernel (MWSP). The core idea is to represent each node in the graph by a feature vector that captures the number of times different "shortest paths" (sequences of connected nodes) appear around that node.

To incorporate multiple scales, the researchers use "truncated BFS trees" - these are like mini-graphs that capture the local neighborhood around each node at different levels of detail. By comparing the distributions of these multi-scale shortest-path features using the Wasserstein distance, MWSP can measure the overall similarity between two graphs while considering both local and global structures.

The researchers show that MWSP outperforms existing graph kernels on a variety of benchmark datasets, demonstrating the advantages of their multi-scale, distribution-aware approach to graph comparison.

Technical Explanation

The key technical components of the MWSP graph kernel are:

1. Multi-scale Shortest-Path Node Feature Map: For each node in a graph, this feature map captures the number of occurrences of different shortest paths around that node. The shortest paths are represented by concatenating the labels of the nodes along the path.

2. Incorporating Multiple Scales: To capture graph structures at different scales, the researchers use truncated Breadth-First Search (BFS) trees rooted at each node. These trees represent the local neighborhood of each node at varying levels of detail.

3. Comparing Feature Distributions with Wasserstein Distance: To compute the similarity between two graphs, the researchers use the Wasserstein distance to compare the distributions of the multi-scale shortest-path node feature maps. This allows them to consider not just the individual features, but how they are distributed within each graph.

The researchers conducted experiments on various benchmark graph datasets and showed that MWSP achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to existing graph kernels. This demonstrates the advantages of their multi-scale, distribution-aware approach to graph comparison.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge a few limitations of their MWSP approach:

1. Computational Complexity: Computing the Wasserstein distance between the multi-scale node feature maps can be computationally expensive, especially for large graphs. The researchers mention that future work could explore ways to improve the scalability of MWSP.

2. Label Sensitivity: MWSP relies on the node labels in the graphs to construct the shortest-path features. If the node labels are not informative or do not accurately reflect the underlying graph structure, the performance of MWSP may be limited.

3. Interpretability: While MWSP achieves strong empirical performance, the researchers do not provide much insight into why the multi-scale shortest-path features and Wasserstein distance are effective for graph comparison. Further analysis of the learned representations and their connections to graph properties could improve the interpretability of the method.

Additionally, one could raise questions about the generalizability of MWSP. The researchers only evaluate it on a limited set of benchmark datasets, so its performance on more diverse or domain-specific graph data is unclear. Exploring the strengths and weaknesses of MWSP across a broader range of graph data could be an interesting area for future research.

Conclusion

The MWSP graph kernel proposed in this paper addresses two key limitations of existing graph kernels: the inability to compare graphs at multiple scales and the lack of consideration for the distributions of substructures within the graphs. By introducing the multi-scale shortest-path node feature map and using the Wasserstein distance to compare these features, MWSP demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on various benchmark datasets.

This work highlights the importance of developing graph comparison methods that can capture the rich, multi-scale structure of real-world graphs. The researchers' insights could have important implications for a wide range of applications, from social network analysis to molecular biology, where understanding the relationships between complex graph-structured data is crucial. As the field of graph machine learning continues to evolve, innovations like MWSP may pave the way for more powerful and versatile graph comparison techniques.